Several studies have suggested that people might be less likely to engage in proenvironmental behavior subsequent to their prior engagement in proenvironmental behavior. We have conducted a preregistered replication of one such recent study of within-domain licensing in the area of environmental protection. Our replication was extended with an analysis of self-perception as a potential mediator of licensing and environmental attitude as its moderator. The results of our web-based experiment (N = 1,765) show that recollection of past proenvironmental behavior does not diminish subsequent support of a proenvironmental energy policy or proenvironmental intention, and that environmental attitude does not moderate licensing. We only found some evidence of an indirect effect of recollection on subsequent policy support and proenvironmental intention, mediated by self-perception; the pattern of mediation is, however, inconsistent with the licensing theory. We have not replicated the licensing effect observed in the original study.
ArnoldO.KaiserF. G. (2018). Understanding the foot-in-the-door effect as a pseudo-effect from the perspective of the Campbell paradigm. International Journal of Psychology, 53(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12289
2.
ArnoldO.KibbeA.HartigT.KaiserF. G. (2018). Capturing the environmental impact of individual lifestyles: Evidence of the criterion validity of the general ecological behavior scale. Environment and Behavior, 50(3), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517701796
BlankenI.van de VenN.ZeelenbergM. (2015). A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215572134
5.
BlankenI.van de VenN.ZeelenbergM.MeijersM. H. C. (2014). Three attempts to replicate the moral licensing effect. Social Psychology, 45(3), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000189
6.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2012). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
7.
BrüggerA.HöchliB. (2019). The role of attitude strength in behavioral spillover: Attitude matters—but not necessarily as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01018
8.
ByrkaK.KaiserF. G. (2013). Health performance of individuals within the Campbell paradigm. International Journal of Psychology, 48(5), 986–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.702215
9.
ByrkaK.KaiserF. G.OlkoJ. (2017). Understanding the acceptance of nature-preservation-related restrictions as the result of the compensatory effects of environmental attitude and behavioral costs. Environment and Behavior, 49(5), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516653638
10.
CatlinJ. R.WangY. (2013). Recycling gone bad: When the option to recycle increases resource consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.04.001
11.
ConwayP.PeetzJ. (2012). When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212442394
12.
CornelissenG.BashshurM. R.RodeJ.Le MenestrelM. (2013). Rules or consequences? The role of ethical mind-sets in moral dynamics. Psychological Science, 24(4), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457376
13.
CornelissenG.PandelaereM.WarlopL.DewitteS. (2008). Positive cueing: Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.06.002
14.
de la FuenteJ.SantiagoJ.RománA.DumitracheC.CasasantoD. (2014). When you think about it, your past is in front of you: How culture shapes spatial conceptions of time. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1682–1690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614534695
15.
DietzT.GardnerG. T.GilliganJ.SternP. C.VandenberghM. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(44), 18452–18456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908738106
16.
EbersoleC. R.AthertonO. E.BelangerA. L.SkulborstadH. M.AllenJ. M.BanksJ. B.BaranskiE.BernsteinM. J.BonfiglioD. B. V.BoucherL.BrownE. R.BudimanN. I.CairoA. H.CapaldiC. A.ChartierC. R.ChungJ. M.CiceroD. C.ColemanJ. A.ConwayJ. G.… NosekB. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012
FanghellaV.d’AddaG.TavoniM. (2019). On the use of nudges to affect spillovers in environmental behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 61. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00061
19.
FiedlerK.SchottM.MeiserT. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.007
20.
GarveyA. M.BoltonL. E. (2016). The licensing effect revisited: How virtuous behavior heightens the pleasure derived from subsequent hedonic consumption. Journal of Marketing Behavior, 2(4), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1561/107.00000029
21.
GarveyA. M.BoltonL. E. (2017). Eco-product choice cuts both ways: How proenvironmental licensing versus reinforcement is contingent on environmental consciousness. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 36(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.16.096
22.
GengL.ChengX.TangZ.ZhouK.YeL. (2016). Can previous pro-environmental behaviours influence subsequent environmental behaviours? The licensing effect of pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 10, E9. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2016.6
HahnelU. J. J.ArnoldO.WaschtoM.KorcajL.HillmannK.RoserD.SpadaH. (2015). The power of putting a label on it: Green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01392
25.
HaidtJ. (2013). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage Books.
26.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
27.
JordanJ.MullenE.MurnighanJ. K. (2011). Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(5), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211400208
28.
KaidaN.KaidaK. (2015). Spillover effect of congestion charging on pro-environmental behavior. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(3), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9550-9
29.
KaiserF. G.BrüggerA.HartigT.BognerF. X.GutscherH. (2014). Appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection: How stable are these attitudes and which comes first?Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 64(6), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2014.09.001
30.
KaiserF. G.ByrkaK.HartigT. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(4), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366452
31.
KaiserF. G.HartigT.BrüggerA.DuvierC. (2013). Environmental protection and nature as distinct attitudinal objects: An application of the Campbell paradigm. Environment and Behavior, 45(3), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511422444
32.
KaiserF. G.WilsonM. (2000). Assessing people’s general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(5), 952–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02505.x
33.
KaiserF. G.WilsonM. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003
34.
KaiserF. G.WilsonM. (2019). The Campbell paradigm as a behavior-predictive reinterpretation of the classical tripartite model of attitudes. European Psychologist, 24(4), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000364
KouchakiM. (2011). Vicarious moral licensing: The influence of others’ past moral actions on moral behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024552
38.
KruschkeJ. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
39.
KuperN.BottA. (2019). Has the evidence for moral licensing been inflated by publication bias?Meta-Psychology, 3(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.878
40.
LacasseK. (2015). The importance of being green: The influence of green behaviors on Americans’ political attitudes toward climate change. Environment and Behavior, 47(7), 754–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513520491
41.
LacasseK. (2016). Don’t be satisfied, identify! Strengthening positive spillover by connecting pro-environmental behaviors to an “environmentalist” label. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.006
McClellandG. H.LynchJ. G.IrwinJ. R.SpillerS. A.FitzsimonsG. J. (2015). Median splits, Type II errors, and false–positive consumer psychology: Don’t fight the power. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.006
44.
MerrittA. C.EffronD. A.MoninB. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x
45.
MillerD. T.EffronD. A. (2010). Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 115–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43003-8
46.
MintonA. P.RoseR. L. (1997). The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00209-3
47.
MoninB.MillerD. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1037//00223514.81.1.33
NilssonA.BergquistM.SchultzW. P. (2017). Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: A review and research agenda. Environmental Education Research, 23(4), 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1250148
50.
NobletC. L.McCoyS. K. (2018). Does one good turn deserve another? Evidence of domain-specific licensing in energy behavior. Environment and Behavior, 50(8), 839–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517718022
RobitailleN. (2014). An investigation of consumer’s moral licensing behavior (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto.
53.
RussellS.FieldingK. (2010). Water demand management research: A psychological perspective. Water Resources Research, 46(5), W05302. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008408
54.
SachdevaS.IlievR.MedinD. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x
55.
SimbrunnerP.SchlegelmilchB. B. (2017). Moral licensing: A culture-moderated meta-analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 67(4), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0128-0
56.
SimonsohnU. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567341
57.
SorrellS.DimitropoulosJ. (2008). The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 636–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.013
58.
Stan Development Team. (2018). Stan modeling language user’s guide and reference manual, version 2.18.0. Retrieved July 8, 2020, from http://mc-stan.org
59.
SteinhorstJ.KlöcknerC. A.MatthiesE. (2015). Saving electricity—For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.012
60.
SusewindM.HoelzlE. (2014). A matter of perspective: Why past moral behavior can sometimes encourage and other times discourage future moral striving. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12214
TiefenbeckV.StaakeT.RothK.SachsO. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy, 57, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.021
63.
TrueloveH. B.CarricoA. R.WeberE. U.RaimiK. T.VandenberghM. P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004
64.
UrbanJ.BahníkŠ.KohlováM. B. (2019). Green consumption does not make people cheat: Three attempts to replicate moral licensing effect due to pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.011
65.
van der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2013a). It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018
66.
van der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2013b). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006
67.
van der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2014). I am what I am, by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 46(5), 626–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512475209
68.
VandenberghM. P.BarkenbusJ.GilliganJ. M. (2008). Individual carbon emissions: The low-hanging fruit. UCLA Law Review, 55, 1701–1758.
69.
WeberE. U. (1997). Perception and expectation of climate change: Precondition for economic and technological adaptation. In BazermanM. H.MessickD. M.TensbrunselA.Wade-BenzoniK. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management (pp. 314–341). Jossey-Bass.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
