The authors describe an observational and analytic methodology for recording and interpreting dynamic microprocesses that occur during social interaction, making use of space–time data collection techniques, spatial-statistical analysis, and visualization. The scheme has three investigative foci: Structure, Activity Composition, and Clustering. In each case, these are associated with either acquiring resources or using socioenvironmental features to influence social intercourse. For each point of focus, the authors provide an analytic strategy and demonstration of its usefulness, using data generated from a 2.5-year observational study of young children’s play behavior. Each tool, and its associated concepts, is used to illustrate how early socializing behavior is embedded in time and space. The results show that geography is a significant catalyst for social dynamics in young children: It provides the opportunity for novel interpretations of sociality along with a better understanding of the influence that geographical factors (location, space, place, spatial structure, spatial composition, landmarks, site) have on the evolving reciprocal interplay between individuals and groups.
AndrewsH. F. (1977). The spatial context of the small-world problem. Environment and Planning A, 9, 1253-1258.
2.
AnsellN. (2009). Childhood and the politics of scale: Descaling children’s geographies?Progress in Human Geography, 33, 190-209.
3.
AtladóttirH. Ó.ParnerE. T.SchendelD.DalsgaardS.ThomsenP. H.ThoresenP. (2007). Time trends in reported diagnoses of childhood neuropsychiatric disorders. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 193-198.
4.
BarkerJ.WellerS. (2003). “Is it fun?” Developing child-centered research methods. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23, 33-58.
5.
ButtsC. T. (2009). Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science, 325, 414-416.
6.
CoscoN. G.MooreR. C.IslamM. Z. (2010). Behavior mapping: A method for linking preschool physical activity and outdoor design. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 42, 513-519.
7.
CressieN. A. C. (1991). Statistics for spatial data. New York, NY: John Wiley.
8.
DibbleC.FeldmanP. G. (2004). The GeoGraph 3D computational laboratory: Network and terrain landscapes for RePast. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 7. Retrirved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/1/7.html
EpsteinJ. M. (2007). Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
EubankS.GucluH.KumarA.MaratheM. V.SrinivasanA.ToroczkaiZ.WangN. (2004). Modelling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks. Nature, 429 (6988):180-184.
12.
FagotB. I.HaganR. (1991). Observation of parent reactions to sex-stereotyped behaviors: Age and sex effects. Child Development, 62, 617-628.
13.
FaustK.EntwistleB.RindfussR. R.WalshS. J.SawangdeeY. (2000). Spatial arrangement of social and economic networks among villages in Nang Rong District, Thailand. Social Networks, 21, 311-337. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733 (99)00014-3
14.
FayardA.-L.WeeksJ. (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28, 605-634. doi:10.1177/ 0170840606068310
15.
FotheringhamA. S.BrunsdonC.CharltonM. (2004). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
16.
GallacherL.GallagherM. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through “participatory methods.”Childhood, 15, 499-516.
17.
GetisA.OrdJ. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24, 189-207.
18.
GriffinW. A.GreeneS. M.Decker-HaasA. (2004). The MICSEASE: An observational coding system for capturing social processes. In KerigP. K.BaucomD. (Eds.), Couple observational coding systems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
HägerstrandT. (1975). Space-time and human conditions. In KarlqvistA.LundqvistL.SnickarsF. (Eds.), Dynamic allocation of urban space (pp. 3-12). Farnborough, UK: Saxon House.
20.
HartupW. W.LaursenB. (1999). Relationships as developmental contexts: Retrospective themes and contemporary issues. In CollinsW. A.LaursenB. (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 13-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
JamesS. (1990). Is there a “place” for children in geography?Area, 22, 278-283.
22.
KernsK. A.BerenbaumS. A. (1991). Sex differences in spatial ability in children. Behavior Genetics, 21, 383-396. doi:10.1007/BF01065974
23.
KindermanT. (1998). Children’s development within peer groups: Using composite social maps to identify peer networks and to study their influences. New Directions in Child Development, 81, 55-82.
24.
KitchinR. M.BladesM.GolledgeR. A. (1997). Relations between psychology and geography. Environment and Behavior, 29, 554-573. doi:10.1177/ 001391659702900406
25.
LaddG. W.KochenderferB. J.ColemanC. C. (1997). Classroom peer acceptance, friendship, and victimization: Distinct relational systems that contribute uniquely to children’s school adjustment?Child Development, 68, 1181-1197.
26.
LatnerJ. D.StunkardA. J. (2003). Getting worse: The stigmatization of obese children. Obesity Research, 11, 452-456.
27.
LazerD.PentlandA.AdamicL.AralS.BarabásiA.-L.BrewerD.. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323, 721-723.
28.
LegendreaA.MunchenbachD. (2011). Two-to-three-year-old children’s interactions with peers in child-care centres: Effects of spatial distance to caregivers. Infant Behavior and Development, 34, 111-125.
29.
LiH.ReynoldsJ. F. (1993). A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 8, 155-162.
30.
LongleyP. A.GoodchildM. F.MaguireD. J.RhindD. W. (2001). Geographic information systems and science. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
31.
MartinC. L.FabesR. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37, 431-446.
32.
MartinP.BatesonP. (1996). Measuring behaviour: An introductory guide (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
McGarigalK.MarksB. (1995). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Portland, OR: Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
34.
MizeJ.LaddG. W. (1988). Predicting preschoolers’ peer behavior and status from their interpersonal strategies: A comparison of verbal and enactive responses to hypothetical social dilemmas. Developmental Psychology, 24, 782-788.
35.
MooreG. T. (1986). Effects of the spatial definition of behavior settings on children’s behavior: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 205-231.
36.
MoranP. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37, 17-23.
37.
OliverM. A.WebsterR. (1990). Kriging: A method of interpolation for geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 4, 313-332.
38.
PateR. R.DavisM. G.RobinsonT. N.StoneE. J.McKenzieT. L.YoungJ. C. (2006). Promoting physical activity in children and youth: A leadership role for schools. Circulation, 114, 1214-1224.
39.
PellegriniA. D. (1996). Observing children in their natural worlds: A methodological primer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
RiittersK. H.O’NeillR. V.WickhamJ. D.JonesK. B. (1996). A note on contagion indices for landscape analysis. Landscape Ecology, 11, 197-202.
41.
RusbyJ.EstesA.DishionT. (1991). The interpersonal process code. Unpublished coding manual. (Available from Oregon Social Learning Center, 207 East 5th Avenue, Ste. 202, Eugene, OR).
42.
SantosA. J.VaughnB. E.BostK. K. (2008). Specifying social structures in preschool classrooms: Descriptive and functional distinctions between affiliative subgroups. Acta Ethologica, 11, 101-113. doi:10.1007/s10211-008-0047-0
43.
SchwartzM. S.SchwartzC. G. (1955). Problems in participant observation. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 343-353.
44.
ShannonC. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656.
45.
SkeltonT. (2009). Children’s geographies/geographies of children: Play, work, mobilities and migration. Geography Compass, 3, 1430-1448.
46.
ThomsonS. (2005). “Territorialising” the primary school playground: Deconstructing the geography of playtime. Children’s Geographies, 3, 63-78.
47.
TorrensP. M. (2001). Where in the world? Exploring the factors driving place location knowledge among secondary level students in Dublin, Ireland. Journal of Geography, 100, 49-61.
48.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. H. (1991). Systematic screening for behavior disorders. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
49.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. H.NicholsonF.KehleT.JensonW. R.ClarkE. (1994). Replication of the Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders procedure for the identification of children. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2, 66-77.
50.
WillisA.GjersoeN.HavardC.KerridgeJ.KuklaR. (2004). Human movement behaviour in urban spaces: Implications for the design and modelling of effective pedestrian environments. Environment and Planning B, 31, 805-828. doi:10.1068/b3060
51.
WongD. W. S.LeeJ. (2005). Statistical analysis of geographic information. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
