Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article compares self-reported and objectively measured physical features in a large-scale environment. Environmental perception has been studied through object perception research but little is known about perception in full-scale environments. Also, few studies examine differences between self-reported and objective environments including the potential effects of distance and content. In this study, a questionnaire, satellite imagery, and geographic information system data were used. Results indicate that self-reported environments are different from objective environments. In addition, self-reported responses separate natural and built environments into two different dimensions. Water combines self-reported and objective measurements into a single dimension. Further analysis revealed that content (natural vs. built) and distance (300 ft vs. 1,500 ft) are important factors influencing the relationships between self-reported and objective environmental measurements. By better understanding relationships between self-reported and objective environments, landscape planners and designers can choose the most appropriate data type for analyzing specific planning and design decisions.

Keywords

environmental perception geographic information system landscape content

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ames, A. (1951). Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window. Psychological Monographs, 55, 104-113.

Appleyard, D. (1976). Planning a pluralist city: Conflicting realities in Ciudad Guayana. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Chokor, B. A. ,& Mene, S. A. (1992). An assessment of preference for landscapes in the developing world: Case study of Warri, Nigeria, and Environs. Journal of Environmental Management, 34, 237-256.

Coeterier, J. F. (1994). Cues for the perception of the size of space in landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 42, 333-347.

Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cuff, D. ,& Hooper, K. (1979). Graphic and mental representation of environments. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, Washington, DC, pp. 10-17.

Getz, D. A. , Karow, A. , & Kielbaso, J. J. (1982). Inner city preferences for trees and urban forestry programs. Journal of Arboriculture, 8(10), 258-263.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

10.

Herzog, T. R. , Kaplan, S. ,& Kaplan, R. (1976). The prediction of preference for unfamiliar urban places. Population and Environment, 5, 43-59.

11.

Huete, A. R. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 25, 295-309.

12.

Ittleson, W. H. (1970). Perception of the large-scale environment. Transactions New York Academy of Sciences, 32, 807-815.

13.

Ittleson, W. H. (1974). Environmental perception: An introduction to environmental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

14.

Kaplan, R. ,& Kaplan, S. (1995). The experience of nature(2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Kaplan, S. , & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. New York: Praeger.

16.

Kirtland, K. A. , Porter, D. E. , Addy, C. L. , Neet, M. J. , Williams, J. E. , Sharpe, P. A. , et al. (2003). Environmental measures of physical activity supports: Perception versus reality. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24, 323-331.

17.

Levin, C. A. , & Haber, R. N. (1993). Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance. Perception and Psychophysics, 54(2), 209-259.

18.

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

19.

Norman, J. (2002). Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 25, 73-144.

20.

Ohno, R. (2000). A hypothetical model of environmental perception. In S. Wapner , J. Demick , T. Yamamoto , & H. Minami (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives in environment-behavior research(pp. 149-156). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

21.

Orians, G. H. , & Heerwagen, J. H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. In J. H. Barkow , L. Cosmide ,& J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture(pp. 555-579). New York: Oxford University Press.

22.

Palmer, J. F. , & Hoffman, R. E. (2001). Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 149-161.

23.

Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

24.

Sallis, J. F. , Melbourne, H. , & Hofstetter, C. R. (1990). Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise among San Diego residents. Public Health Report, 105, 179-185.

25.

Sullivan, W. C. (1994). Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe: Citizen preferences for natural and developed settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29, 85-101.

26.

Troped, P. J. , Saunders, R. P. , Pate, R. R. , Reininger, B. , Ureda, J. R. , & Thompson, S. J. (2001). Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community retail-trail. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 191-200.

27.

Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia: Study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

28.

Ulrich, R. S. (1984). Human responses to vegetation and landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44.

29.

Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscape. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis(pp. 73-137). Washington, DC: Island Press.

30.

Wiest, W. M. , & Bell, B. (1985). Stevens' exponent for psychophysical scaling of perceived, remembered, and inferred distance. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 457-470.

Large-Scale Environmental Knowledge

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References