Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines how people read and comprehend house floor plans, by conducting a psychological experiment. In the experiment, 94 people are asked to classify 48 cards on which various types of floor plans differing along 5 dimensions were printed. Participants’ categorization data are analyzed in terms of (a) which attributes of floor plans people attend to when classifying them, and (b) whether and how people differ in the way of conceiving and classifying floor plans. Results show the existence of (a) a systematic pattern in people’s perception and conceptualization of house floor plans, and (b) group differences among people in the attributes of plans that they think important and attend to in classification. Implications for a housing information search and provision are discussed, particularly the possibility of providing information about floor plans in ways that are tailored to the recipient’s type of information search.

Keywords

housing selection house floor plans information search categorization spatial representations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adair, A.S. , Berry, J.N. , & McGreal, W.S. ( 1996). Hedonic modelling, housing submarkets and residential valuation. Journal of Property Research, 13, 67-83.

Bafna, S. ( 2003). Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment and Behavior, 35, 17-29.

Bandyopadhyay, A. , & Merchant, A.N. (2006). Space syntax analysis of colonial houses in India. Environment and Planning B, 33, 923-942.

Ben-Shahar, D. ( 2007). Tenure choice in the housing market: Psychological versus economic factors. Environment and Behavior, 39, 841-858.

Chi, M.T.H. , Feltovich, P.J. , & Glaser, R. ( 1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.

Cho, C.-J. ( 1997). Joint choice of tenure and dwelling type: A multinomial logit analysis for the city of Chongju. Urban Studies, 34, 1459-1473.

Dellaert, B.G.C. , & Stremersch, S. (2005). Marketing mass-customised products: Striking a balance between utility and complexity. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 219-227.

Garcia, J.A.B. , & Hernández, J.E.R. (2008). Housing demand in Spain according to dwelling type: Microeconometric evidence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38, 363-377.

Gentile, M. , & Tammaru, T. ( 2006). Housing and ethnicity in the post-Soviet city: Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan. Urban Studies, 43, 1757-1778.

10.

Goodman, A.C. , & Thibodeau, T.G. (2007). The spatial proximity of metropolitan area housing submarkets. Real Estate Economics , 35, 209-232.

11.

Hanazato, T. , Hirano, Y. , & Sasaki, M. ( 2005). Syntactic analysis of large-scale condominium units supplied in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 591, 9-16.

12.

Haurin, D. ( 1988). The duration of market time of residential housing. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 16, 396-410.

13.

Hirtle, S.C. , & Jonides, J. ( 1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory and Cognition, 13, 208-217.

14.

Hoekstra, J. ( 2005). Is there a connection between welfare state regime and dwelling type? An exploratory statistical analysis. Housing Studies, 20, 475-495.

15.

Hofman, E. , Halman, J.I.M. , & Ion, R.A. ( 2006). Variation in housing design: Identifying customer preferences . Housing Studies, 21, 929-943.

16.

Holding, C.S. ( 1992). Clusters and reference points in cognitive representations of the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 45-55.

17.

Nakata, S. ( 2007). Effective methods of providing information about house floor plans by considering consumers’ preferences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tokyo.

18.

Nelson, T.R. , & Rabianski, J. ( 1988). Consumer preferences in housing market analysis: An application of multidimensional scaling techniques. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 16, 138-159.

19.

Pothos, E.M. , & Chater, N. ( 2002). A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization . Cognitive Science, 26, 303-343.

20.

Riding, R. ( 2001). The nature and effects of cognitive style. In R. J. Sternberg & L.- F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 47-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Rouwendal, J. , & Meijer, E. ( 2001). Preferences for housing, jobs, and commuting: A mixed logit analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 41, 475-505.

22.

Wang, D. , & Li, S.-M. ( 2006). Socio-economic differentials and stated housing preferences in Guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 30, 305-326.

23.

Yates, J. , & Mackay, D.F. ( 2006). Discrete choice modelling of urban housing markets: A critical review and an application. Urban Studies, 43, 559-581.

24.

Zimring, C. , & Dalton, R.C. ( 2003). Linking objective measures of space to cognition and action. Environment and Behavior, 35, 3-16.

Perception and Conceptualization of House Floor Plans: An Experimental Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References