Are people sensitive to the level of compatibility in everyday settings? We manipulated via scenario both a specified goal and a setting typically associated with a given goal. Settings were either typically compatible with the specified goal or not. Different participants rated either compatibility (as a direct indicator of sensitivity to manipulated compatibility) or preference for being in the setting (as an indirect indicator of sensitivity). For both measures, mean ratings were significantly greater in the high-compatibility conditions than in the low-compatibility conditions.We conclude that people are indeed sensitive to the level of compatibility in everyday settings. These findings indicate that a core concept of Attention Restoration Theory (ART), compatibility, has psychological reality in everyday settings and thus support the construct validity and external validity of the compatibility concept.
Alexander, C. ( 1979). The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Aronson, E., Brewer, M., & Carlsmith, J.M. (1985). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 441-486). New York: Random House.
3.
Berman, M.G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. ( 2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207-1212.
4.
Berto, R. ( 2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249-259.
5.
Canin, L.H. ( 1992). Psychological restoration among AIDS caregivers: Maintaining self care. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
6.
Cimprich, B. ( 1993). Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 16, 83-92.
7.
Cimprich, B. ( 1999). Pre-treatment symptom distress in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 22, 185-194.
8.
Felsten, G. ( 2009). Where to take a study break on the college campus: An attention restoration theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 160-167.
9.
Hartig, T., Evans, G.W., Jamner, L.D., Davis, D.S., & Garling, T. ( 2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings . Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109-123.
10.
Hartig, T., Korpella, K., Evans, G.W., & Garling, T. ( 1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14, 175-194.
11.
Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G.W. ( 1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences . Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26.
12.
Hartig, T., & Staats, H. ( 2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 26, 215-226.
13.
Herzog, T.R., Black, A.M., Fountaine, K.A., & Knotts, D.J. ( 1997). Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 17, 165-170.
14.
Herzog, T.R., Chen, H.C., & Primeau, J.S. ( 2002). Perception of the restorative potential of natural and other settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 295-306.
15.
Herzog, T.R., Maguire, C.P., & Nebel, M.B. ( 2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments . Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 159-170.
16.
Herzog, T.R., Ouellette, P., Rolens, J.R., & Koenigs, A.M. (IN PRESS). Houses of worship as restorative environments. Environment and Behavior.
17.
Herzog, T.R., & Rector, A.E. ( 2009). Perceived danger and judged likelihood of restoration . Environment and Behavior, 41, 387-401.
18.
Kaplan, R. ( 2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits . Environment and Behavior, 33, 507-542.
19.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. ( 1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective . New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R.L. ( 1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Washington, DC: Island Press .
21.
Kaplan, S. ( 1983). A model of person-environment compatibility. Environment and Behavior, 15, 311-332.
22.
Kaplan, S. ( 1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.
23.
Kaplan, S. ( 2001). Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33, 480-506.
24.
Kaplan, S., Bardwell, L.V., & Slakter, D.B. ( 1993). The museum as a restorative environment. Environment and Behavior, 25, 725-742.
25.
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. ( 1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. New York: Praeger.
26.
Korpella, K.M., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F.G., & Fuhrer, U. ( 2001). Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environment and Behavior, 33, 572-589.
27.
Kuo, F.E. ( 2001). Coping with poverty: Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior, 33, 5-34.
28.
Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33, 343-367.
29.
Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K.M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 31-44.
30.
Leff, H.L., & Gordon, L.R. ( 1979). Environmental cognitive sets: A longitudinal study. Environment and Behavior, 11, 291-327.
31.
Ouellette, P., Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. ( 2005). The monastery as a restorative environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 175-188.
32.
Staats, H., & Hartig, T. ( 2004). Alone or with a friend: A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 199-211.
33.
Staats, H., Kieviet, A., & Hartig, T. ( 2003). Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 147-157.
34.
Stamps, A.E. ( 1999). Demographic effects in environmental aesthetics: A meta-analysis . Journal of Planning Literature, 14, 155-175.
35.
Taylor, A.F., Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and Behavior , 33, 54-77.
36.
Taylor, A.F., Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. (2002). Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner-city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 49-63.
37.
Tennessen, C.M., & Cimprich, B. ( 1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 77-85.
38.
Wells, N.M. ( 2000). At home with nature: Effects of "greenness" on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32, 775-795.
39.
Wurman, R.S. ( 1971). Making the city observable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
