Experiencing the Restorative Components of Wilderness Environments: Does Congestion Interfere and Does Length of Exposure Matter?

Abstract

Wilderness should provide opportunities for stress reduction and restoration of mental fatigue. Visitors, surveyed as they exited wilderness trailheads, were asked for self-assessments of stress reduction and mental rejuvenation and the extent to which they experienced various restorative components of the environment—attributes deemed by attention restorative theory to be conducive to restoration. Day and overnight hikers on both very high use and moderate use trails were studied. Most respondents reported substantial stress reduction and mental rejuvenation and most experienced the environment in ways considered conducive to restoration. At the moderate to high use levels we studied, psychological restoration did not vary significantly with level of congestion, suggesting that concern about restorative experiences is not a valid rationale for limiting use on wilderness trails. Day trips reduced stress and allowed for mental rejuvenation to the same degree that overnight trips did. However, several of the restorative components of environment were experienced to a significantly greater degree as length of trip increased.

Keywords

congestion crowding outdoor recreation restorative environments wilderness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berto, R. ( 2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249-259.

Chang, C. , Hammitt, W.E. , Chen, P. , Machnik, L. , & Su, W. ( 2008). Psychophysiological responses and restorative values of natural environments in Taiwan. Landscape and Urban Planning , 85, 79-84.

Cohen, J. ( 1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin , 112, 155-159.

Cole, D.N. ( 1995). Experimental trampling of vegetation. I. Relationship between trampling intensity and vegetation response. Journal of Applied Ecology, 32, 203-214.

Cole, D.N. , & Hall, T.E. ( 2008). Wilderness visitors, experiences and management preferences: How they vary with use level and length of stay. (Research Paper-RMRS-RP-71). Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station.

Driver, B.L. , Brown, P.J. , & Peterson, G.L. (1991). Benefits of leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.

Hammitt, W.E. ( 2005). A restorative definition for outdoor recreation. In K. Bricker (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2004 Northeastern recreation research symposium (General Technical Report NE-326, pp. 1-5). Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service Northeastern Experiment Station.

Hartig, T. , Book, A. , Garvill, J. , Olsson, T. , & Gärling, T. (1996). Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology , 37, 378-393.

Hartig, T. , Korpela, K. , Evans, G.W. , & Gärling, T. (1997). A measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14, 175-194.

10.

Harvey, M. ( 2005). Wilderness forever: Howard Zahniser and the path to the Wilderness Act. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

11.

Herzog, T.R. , Maguire, C. , & Nebel, M.B. ( 2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments . Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 159-170.

12.

Ivarsson, C.T. , & Hagerhall, C.M. (2008). The perceived restorativeness of gardens-Assessing the restorativeness of a mixed built and natural scene type. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 7, 107-108

13.

Kaplan, R. ( 1984). Wilderness perception and psychological benefits: An analysis of a continuing program. Leisure Sciences, 6, 271-290.

14.

Kaplan, R. ( 2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits . Environment and Behavior, 33, 507-542.

15.

Kaplan R. , & Kaplan, S. ( 1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective . New York: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Kaplan, R. , Kaplan, S. , & Ryan, R.L. ( 1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Washington, DC: Island Press .

17.

Kaplan, S. ( 1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrated framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.

18.

Kelly, J.R. ( 1996). Leisure (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

19.

Korpela, K. , & Hartig, T. ( 1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 221-233.

20.

Laumann, K. , Gärling, T. , & Stormark, K.M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 31-44.

21.

Manning, R.E. ( 1999). Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction (2nd ed.). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.

22.

Marshall, R. ( 1930). The problem of the wilderness. Scientific Monthly, 28, 141-148.

23.

Purcell, A.T. , Peron, E. , & Berto, R. ( 2001). Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environment and Behavior, 33, 93-106.

24.

Regoeczi, W.C. ( 2003). When context matters: A multilevel analysis of household and neighbourhood crowding on aggression and withdrawal. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 457-470.

25.

Schuster, R.M. , Hammitt, W.E. , & Moore, D. ( 2006). Stress appraisal and coping response to hassles experienced in outdoor recreation settings. Leisure Sciences, 28, 97-113.

26.

Staats, H. , & Hartig, T. ( 2004). Alone or with a friend: A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 199-211.

27.

Ulrich, R.S. ( 1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment . In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). New York: Plenum .

28.

Ulrich, R.S. , Simons, R.F. , Losito, B.D. , Fiorito, E. , Miles, M.A. , & Zelson, M. ( 1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.