Internal and External Aesthetics of Housing Estates

Abstract

This article focuses on internal and external aesthetic aspects in 12 housing estates, including terraced, row, detached and semidetached houses, and four-storey blocks of flats sold to low-income people by the public sector in the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre, Brazil. The image and appearance of housing estates and visual composition of buildings are investigated. Relationships between aesthetic aspects, resident attitudes and behavior concerning the housing environment, household characteristics and feelings about internal and external aesthetics of housing estates are further explored. Data were collected through questionnaires, structured interviews, physical measurements, observations of behavior, and physical traces. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively and quantitatively by means of nonparametric statistical tests. Results show, for example, that aspects associated with maintenance of dwelling facades dominate the explanations for positive external aesthetics evaluation, while aspects associated with maintenance and visual composition of facades lead the explanations for negative external aesthetics evaluation.

Keywords

internal aesthetics external aesthetics housing estates aesthetics evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnheim, R. ( 1977). The dynamics of architectural form. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of Califórnia Press.

Bentley, I. , McGlynn, S. , Alcock, A. , Smith, G. , & Murrain, P. ( 1985). Responsive environments. London: Architectural Press.

Darke, J. ( 1982). The design of public housing: Architects’ intentions and users’ reactions. Unpublished doctoral, dissertation, Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield.

Francescato, G. , Weidemann, S. , Anderson, J.R. , & Chenoweth. R. ( 1979). Residents’ satisfaction in HUD-assisted housing: Design and management factors. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Golledge, R. , & Stimson, R. ( 1997). Spatial behavior: A geographic perspective. New York: Guilford.

Groat, L. ( 1988). Contextual compatibility in architecture: An issue of personal taste? In J. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 228-253). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lang, J. ( 1987). Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioural sciences in environmental design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Lang, J. ( 1988). Symbolic aesthetics in architecture: Toward a research agenda. In J. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications (pp.11-26). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lay, A. , & Reis, A. ( 2003). The influence of physical changes in communal open spaces on performance evaluation of housing schemes. Proceedings of the 34 Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (Vol. 1, pp. 123-132). Minneapolis : EDRA.

10.

Lozano, E. ( 1988). Visual needs in urban environments and physical planning . In J. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 395-421). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Lynch, K. ( 1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Martindale, C. ( 1988). Aesthetics, psychobiology, and cognition. In F. Farley & R. Neperud (Ed.), The foundations of aesthetics, art, & art education (pp. 7-42). New York: Praeger.

13.

Moore, G. T. , & Golledge, R. G. (Eds.). (1976). Environmental knowing: Concepts and theories. Environmental knowing: Theories, research, and methods (pp. 3-24). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.

14.

Nasar, J. (Ed.). (1988). Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Nasar, J. ( 1997). New developments in aesthetics for urban design. In G. T. Moore & R. W. Marans (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design: Vol.4. Toward the integration of theory, methods, research, and utilization (pp. 149-193). New York: Plenum.

16.

Nasar, J. ( 1998). The evaluative image of the city. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

17.

Porteous, J. ( 1996). Environmental aesthetics: Ideas, politics and planning . London: Routledge.

18.

Prak, N. ( 1985). The visual perception of the built environment. Delft: Delft University Press.

19.

Purcell, A.T. ( 1984). The aesthetic experience and mundane reality. In W. R. Crozier & A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive processes in the perception of art (pp. 189-210). Amsterdam: North-Holland .

20.

Purcell, A.T. , & Lamb, R. ( 1998). Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42, 57-66.

21.

Reis, A. ( 1992). Mass housing design, user participation and satisfaction . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oxford: Post-graduate Research School, Oxford Brookes University.

22.

Reis, A. ( 2001). Housing appearance as an indicator of housing quality . Proceedings of the 32 Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (Vol. 1, pp. 68-74). Edinburgh : EDRA.

23.

Rapoport, A. , & Kantor, R.E. ( 1967). Complexity and ambiguity in environmental design. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 33, 210-222.

24.

Sanoff, H. ( 1991). Visual research methods in design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

25.

Stamps, A.E. III ( 2000). Psychology and the aesthetics of the built environment . Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.

26.

von Meiss, P. ( 1993). Elements of architecture-From form to place. London: E & FN Spon.

27.

Weber, R. ( 1995). On the aesthetics of architecture, a psychological approach to the structure and the order of perceived architectural space. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.