This article examines whether specialized lids on waste receptacles affect recycling compliance in public settings. Thirty waste receptacles were assigned to a lids-present and lids-absent condition, and the number of recyclable items found in recycling and waste bins served as the dependent measure. Results indicated the presence of specialized recycling container lids increased the beverage-recycling rate by 34%, which suggests that perceptual affordances of specialized container lids improve recycling compliance. Possible underlying mechanisms and implications for institutions seeking to promote recycling as an environmentally responsible behavior are discussed.
Austin, J., Hatfield, D.B., Grindle, A.C., & Bailey, J. (1993). Increasing recycling in office environments: The effect of specific, informative cues. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 247-253.
2.
Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A U.K. case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior, 39, 435-473.
3.
Brothers, K.J., Krantz, P.J., & McClannahan, L.E. (1994). Office paper recycling: A function of container proximity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 153-160.
4.
Beukering, P. J. H. van (2001). Recycling, international trade and recycling: An empirical analysis. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
5.
Cialdini, R.B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment . Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105-109.
6.
Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., & Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
7.
Ewing, G. (2001). Altruistic, egoistic, and normative effects on curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 33, 733-764.
8.
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world . New York: Oxford University Press .
10.
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 20-29.
11.
Guagnano, G.A., Stern, P.C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationship: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699-718.
12.
Hershkowitz, A.In defense of recycling. Social Research, 65, 141-218.
13.
Luyben, P.D., & Bailey, J. (1979). Newspaper recycling: The effects of awards and proximity of containers. Environment and Behavior, 11, 539-557.
14.
Norman, D. (2002). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Reid, D.H., Luyben, P.D., Rawers, R.J., & Bailey, J.S., (1976). Newspaper recycling behavior: The effect of prompting and proximity of containers. Environment and Behavior, 8, 471-481.
16.
Schultz, W.P., Nolan, J.M., Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science , 18, 429-434.
17.
Schultz, W.P., Oskamp, S., & Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when: A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 105-121.
18.
Spence, C. & Read, L. (2003). Speech shadowing while driving: On the difficulty of splitting attention between eye and ear. Psychological Science, 14, 251-256.
19.
Strayer, D.L., & Johnston, W.A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone . Psychological Science, 12, 462-466.
20.
Todd, P.M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Environments that make us smart: Ecological rationality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 167-171.
21.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2007 ). Municipal solid waste generation, recycling, and disposal in the United States: Facts and figures for 2006. (EPA-530F07-030)
22.
Werner, C.M., Rhodes, M.U., & Partain, K.K. (1998) Designing effective instructional signs with schema theory: Case studies of polystyrene recycling. Environment and Behavior, 30, 709-735.
