Every year, 45,000 forest fires occur in Europe, destroying a forested surface area equivalent to the size of Belgium. Nearly 60% of the forest fires have been ascribed to arson, and for this reason the so-called environmental crime has been included in the legal codes of the members of the European Union. For instance, in Spain forest fires are objects of prosecution in a court of law. This study analyzes the following variables: conservatism, dogmatism, locus of control, attitude toward the legal system, factors from the short Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Inventory (responsibility, openness, extraversion, and kindness), specific variables in the particular cases proposed (forest fires), and attitude toward the protection and improvement of the environment. The specific variables used in each case may help in better delineating verdict trends.
Álvarez, P., & De la Fuente, E.I. (1998). Evaluación de actitudes ambientales. Construcción y validación de una escala para universitarios españoles [Environmental attitude assessment. Construction and validation of an environmental attitude scale for Spanish university students]. Revista de Educación de la Universidad de Granada, 11, 93-116.
2.
Álvarez, P., De la Fuente, E.I., Perales, F.J., & García, J. (2002). Analysis of a quasi-experimental design based on environmental problem-solving for the initial training for future teachers of environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education , 33(2), 19-21.
3.
Álvarez, P., García-Cueto, E., & Cañadas, G. (2004). Escalamiento subjetivo de problemas ambientales. Un estudio comparativo entre universitarios expertos y legos [Subjective scaling of environmental problems. A comparative study between experts and lays]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento (special volume), 25-30.
4.
Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Sobral, J. (1995). Construcción estadística de perfiles predictores de sesgo en la formación de juicios [Statistical construction of slant predictors' profiles in judgment making]. Revista de Psicología Social , 10(1), 3-16.
5.
Cajal, B., & Palmer, A. (1993). Procesos predeliberativos influyentes en la toma de decisión de un jurado [Influential predeliverative processes in decision making by jury]. Boletín de Psicología, 38(4), 33-52.
6.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. (1999 ). Estudio 2322: Del medio ambiente [From the environment] . CIS: Datos de Opinión, 21, 3-5.
7.
Collins,T. (1997, August 1-15). Environment gaining in polls. The Earth Times, 4.
8.
Costa, P.T., & McRae, R.R. (1999). Inventario NEO reducido de cinco factores (NEO-FFI) [Inventory NEO reduced to five factors]. Madrid: TEA.
9.
De la Fuente, E.I., De la Fuente, L., & García, J. (2003). Effects of pretrial juror bias, strength of evidence and deliberation process on juror decisions: New validity evidence of the Juror Bias Scale scores. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9(2), 197-209.
10.
De la Fuente, E.I., García, J., & Martín, I. (1998). Some individual differences in perception of the evidence and the verdict choice. Psychology, Crime & Law , 4, 361-373.
11.
De la Fuente, E.I., García-Cueto, E., San Luis, C., & De la Fuente, L. (2002). Escalamiento subjetivo de conductas delictivas [Subjective scaling of crime behaviors]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 4(1), 67-76.
12.
De Paul, P. (1991). El proceso de deliberación en el jurado [Process of deliberation in the Jury]. Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense.
13.
Devine, D.J., Clayton, L.D., Dunford, B.B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy and Law , 7(3), 622-727.
14.
Diamond, S.S. (1990). Scientific jury selection: What social scientists know and do not know. Judicature, 73(4), 178-183.
15.
Dietz, T., Stern, P.C., & Guagnano, G.A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30(4), 450-471.
16.
European Commission. (2005). Eurobarometer 63. Retrieved February 10, 2005, from http://europa.en.int/comm/public-opinion/archives/eb/eb63.htm
17.
Ferreira, J. (2000). Os portugueses e o ambiente [Portuguese people and the environment]. Oeiras, Portugal: Celta Editora.
18.
García, J. (2000). Adaptación del Cuestionario de Actitudes Legales para la definición de perfiles psicosociales en la selección de jurados [Adaptation of the questionnaire of legal attitudes for the definition of psychosocial profiles in the selection of jurors]. Almería: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Almería. [CD edition]
19.
García, J., De la Fuente, L., & De la Fuente, E.I. (2002). Una visión psicojurídica del Jurado español desde sus fundamentos y funcionamiento [A psycholegal vision of the Spanish jury from its foundation and operation]. Psicología Política, 24, 67-94.
20.
García-Mira, R., Real, J.E., Durán, M., & Romay, J. (2002). Predicting environmental attitudes and behavior . In G. Moser, E. Pol, Y. Bernard, M. Bonnes, J. A. Corraliza , & V. Giuliani (Eds.), Places, people and sustainability / sustainability, people and places. Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
21.
Gómez, C., Noya, F.J., & Paniagua, A. (1999). Actitudes y comportamientos hacia el medio ambiente en España [Attitudes and behaviors toward the environment in Spain]. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas .
22.
Hans, V.P., & Vidmar, N. (1986). Judging the jury. New York : Plenum.
23.
Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
24.
Kassin, S.M., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1983). The construction and validation of a juror bias scale. Journal of Research in Personality , 12, 423-442.
25.
Kovera; M.D., Dickinson, J.J., & Cutler, B.L. (2003). Voir dire and jury selection: Practical issues, research findings and directions for future research. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology (pp. 161-175). New York: John Wiley.
26.
Kravitz, D.A., Cutler, B.L., & Brock, P. (1993). Readability and validity of the original and revised legal attitudes questionnaire. Law and Human Behavior, 17(6), 661-677.
27.
López Muñoz, M. (1995). Comentarios a la Ley Orgánica 5/1995 del Tribunal del Jurado [Commentaries to the Spanish Organic Law 5/1995 of the Jury]. Madrid: Dykinson.
28.
Moran, G. (2000, August). Florida international university criminal juror survey. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convection, Washington, DC.
29.
Narby, D.J., Cutler, B.L., & Moran, G. (1993). A metaanalysis of association between authoritarian-ism and jurors' perceptions do defendant culpability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 34-42.
30.
Nietzel, M.T., McCarthy, D.M., & Kern, M.J. (1999). Juries. The current state of the empirical literature . In R. Roesch, S. T. Hart, & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of the discipline (pp. 23-52). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum .
31.
Roldán, H. (2003). Detección e investigación de delitos ecológicos [Detection and investigation of ecological crimes]. Cuaderno Vasco del Instituto de Criminología, 17, 57-64.
32.
Rotenberg, K.J., Hewlett, M.G., & Siegwart, C.M. (1998). Principles moral reasoning and self-monitoring as predictors of jury functioning. Basic and Applied Psychology, 20(2), 167-173.
33.
Schann, J., & Holzer, E. (1990). Studies of individual environmental concern. The role of knowledge, gender and background variables. Environment and Behavior, 22, 767-786.
34.
Scott, D., & Willits, F.K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior. A Pennsylvania survey. Environment and Behavior, 26(2), 239-260.
35.
Sealy, A.P. (1981). Another look at social psychological aspect of juror bias. Law and Human Behavior, 5(2/3), 187-210.
36.
Sobral, J., & Arce, R. (1990). La psicología social en la sala de justicia [Social psychology in the court of justice]. Barcelona: Paidós.
37.
Sobral, J., Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (1989). Aspectos psicosociales de las decisiones judiciales: revisión y lectura diferenciada [Psychosocial aspects of judicial decisions] . Boletín de Psicología, 25, 49-74.
38.
Stern, P.C., Dietz, C., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender and environmental concern . Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 322-348.
39.
Stern, P.C., Dietz, C., & Guagnano, G.A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in socio-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723-743.
40.
Uzzell, D.L., Rutland, A., & Whistance, D. (1995). Questioning values in environmental education . In Y. Guerrier, N. Alexander, J. Chase, & M. O'Brien (Eds.), Values and the environment (pp. 172-182). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
WWF/Adena. ( 2005). Incendios forestales. ¿Por qué se queman los bosques españoles? [Forest fires. Why are Spanish forests burned?]. Madrid: Gráficas Palermo. Available from http://www.wwf.es
