Few researches have considered fear of crime as a context-specific experience. This article promotes a place-based theoretical framework for studying crime perceptions through presenting app-based and crowdsourcing measures of perception of crime and place as a robust methodological framework. A systematic review of published studies that use crowdsourced or app-based measures to explore perceptions of crime was conducted. From the 27 studies that met our inclusion criteria, reported strengths and limitations were synthesized to determine key developments and common issues, illustrated with data from three app-based studies. We found consensus that app-based and crowdsourcing measures of fear of crime capture more precise spatial and temporal data alongside auxiliary information about the individual and the environment. Practical benefits, such as reduced cost of data collection and implementable outputs that are useful to practitioners were also highlighted. However, limitations around sampling biases, generalizability of findings, and the under-representation of certain areas persist.
ArmitageR. (2017). Crime prevention through environmental design. In WortleyR.TownsleyM. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (2nd ed., pp. 259–285). Routledge.
2.
BethlehemJ.BiffignandiS. (2012). Handbook of web surveys. Wiley.
BivandR. S. (2010). Exploratory spatial data analysis. In FischerM. M.GetisA. (Eds.), Handbook of applied spatial analysis (pp. 219–254). Springer.
5.
BlomJ.ViswanathanD.GoJ.SpasojevicM.AcharyaK.AhoniusR. (2010). Fear and the city - Role of mobile services in harnessing safety and security in urban contexts. In CHI’10 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1841–1850). Association for Computing Machinery.
6.
BragaA. A.PapachristosA. V.HureauD. M. (2014). The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 31(4), 633–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.673632
7.
Buil-GilD. (2016). InseguridApp: Estudio piloto de los patrones de distribución espacio-temporal de los enclaves del miedo (al crimen) en Elche a partir de una nueva aplicación móvil [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Miguel Hernández University.
8.
BurnapP.RanaO. F.AvisN.WilliamsM.HousleyW.EdwardsA.MorganJ.SloanL. (2015). Detecting tension in online communities with computational Twitter analysis. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 95, 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.04.013
9.
CandeiaD.FigueiredoF.AndradeN.QuerciaD. (2017). Multiple images of the city: Unveiling group-specific urban perceptions through a crowdsourcing game. In HT’17 Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media Pages (pp. 135–144). Association for Computing Machinery.
10.
CastenJ. A.PayneB. K. (2008). The influence of perceptions of social disorder and victimization on business owners’ decisions to use guardianship strategies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(5), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.07.005
11.
Castro-ToledoF. J.Perea-GarcíaJ. O.Bautista-OrtuñoR.MitkidisP. (2017). Influence of environmental variables on fear of crime: Comparing self-report data with physiological measures in an experimental design. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(4), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9295-1
12.
CeccatoV.WilhelmssonM. (2012). The impact of crime on apartment prices: Evidence from Stockholm, Sweden. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 93(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2011.00362.x
13.
ChatawayM. L.HartT. C.CoomberR.BondC. (2017). The geography of crime fear: A pilot study exploring event-based perceptions of risk using mobile technology. Applied Geography, 86, 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.06.010
14.
ClarkeR. V. (1983). Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. Crime and Justice, 4, 225–256.
15.
ClarkeR. V.BowersK. (2017). Seven misconceptions of situational crime prevention. In TilleyN.SidebottomA. (Eds.), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety (2nd ed., pp. 109–142). Routledge.
16.
CrosbyF.HermensF. (2019). Does it look safe? An eye tracking study into the visual aspects of fear of crime. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818769203
17.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (2014). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer.
18.
De SilvaC. S.WarusavitharanaE. J.RatnayakeR. (2016). Application of open source hardware and software in assessing the varying levels of perceived safety in cities. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Faculty of Architecture Research Unit (FARU) (pp. 236–249). University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.
19.
DoranB. J.BurgessM. B. (2012). Putting fear of crime on the map. Springer.
20.
DubeyA.NaikN.ParikhD.RaskarR.HidalgoC. A. (2016). Deep learning the city: Quantifying urban perception at a global scale. In Computer Vision – European Conference on Computer Vision 2016 (pp. 169–212). Springer.
EreteS.NicoleL.MummJ.BoussayoudA.Ogbonnaya-ObguruI. F. (2016). “That neighborhood is sketchy!”: Examining online conversations about social disorder in transitioning neighborhoods. In CHI EA ‘16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1180–1186). Association for Computing Machinery.
23.
FarrallS.BannisterJ.DittonJ.GilchristE. (1997). Questioning the measurement of the ‘fear of crime’: Findings from a major methodological study. British Journal of Criminology, 37(4), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014203
24.
FattahE. A.SaccoV. F. (1989). Crime and victimisation of the elderly. Springer-Verlag.
FisherB.NasarJ. J. (1992). Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: Prospect, refuge, and escape. Environment and Behavior, 24(1), 35–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916592241002
27.
FosterS.Giles-CortiB.KnuimanM. (2014). Does fear of crime discourage walkers? A social-ecological exploration of fear as a deterrent to walking. Environment and Behavior, 46(6), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512465176
28.
GabrielU.GreveW. (2003). The psychology of fear of crime. Conceptual and methodological perspectives. British Journal of Criminology, 43(1), 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/43.3.600
29.
GómezF.TorresA.GalvisJ.CamargoJ.MartínezO. (2016). Hotspot mapping for perception of security. In 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2). IEEE.
30.
GravelJ.BouchardM.DescormiersK.WongJ. S.MorselliC. (2013). Keeping promises: A systematic review and a new classification of gang control strategies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(4), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.05.005
GuedesI.FernandesP.da AgraC.CardosoC. (2014). Studying the contextual cues associated with fear of crime through eye tracking techniques. In da AgraC.CardosoC.de MaillardJ.O’ReilyC.PonsaersP.ShaplandJ. (Eds.), Criminology, security and justice. Methodological and epistemological issues (pp. 57–82). Maklu.
HamiltonM.SalimF.ChengE.ChoyS. (2011). Transafe: A crowdsourced mobile platform for crime and safety perception management. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 41(2), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2095272.2095275
35.
HarveyC.Aultman-HallL.HurleyS. E.TroyA. (2015). Effects of skeletal streetscape design on perceived safety. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.007
36.
HoughM. (2004). Worry about crime: mental events or mental states?International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(2), 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557042000194559
37.
HoweJ. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 14(6), 161–165.
38.
InnesM. (2004). Signal crimes and signal disorders: notes on deviance as communicative action. The British Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00023.x
JacksonJ.GousetiI. (2015). Psychological proximity and the construal of crime: A commentary on ‘Mapping fear of crime as a context-dependent everyday experience that varies in space and time’. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 212–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12082
41.
JacksonJ.GrayE. (2010). Functional fear and public insecurities about crime. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azp059
42.
JonesPDruryR.McBeathJ. (2011). Using GPS-enabled mobile computing to augment qualitative interviewing: Two case studies. Field Methods, 23(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10388467
43.
KennedyL. W.SilvermanR. A. (1985). Perception of social diversity and fear of crime. Environment and Behavior, 17(3), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916585173001
44.
KimJ.ChaM.SandholmT. (2014). SocRoutes: Safe routes based on tweet sentiments. In WWW ‘14 Companion. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 178–182). Association for Computing Machinery.
45.
KyttäM.KuoppaJ.HirvonenJ.AhmadiE.TzoulasT. (2014). Perceived safety of the retrofit neighborhood: A location-based approach. Urban Design International, 19(4), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.31
LeitnerM.KounadiO. (2015). Mapping fear of crime as a context-dependent everyday experience that varies in space and time. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 218–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12076
48.
LiX.ZhangC.LiW. (2015). Does the visibility of greenery increase perceived safety in urban areas? Evidence from the Place Pulse 1.0 dataset. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4, 1166–1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4031166
LorencT.PetticrewM.WhiteheadM.NearyD.ClaytonS.WrightK.ThomsonH.CumminsS.SowdenA.RentonA. (2013). Fear of crime and the environment: systematic review of UK qualitative evidence. BMC Public Health, 14(496), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-496
MarzbaliM. H.AbdullahA.RazakN. A.TilakiM. J. M. (2012). The influence of crime prevention through environmental design on victimisation and fear of crime. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.005
53.
MooreS. E. H.BreezeS. (2012). Spaces of male fear: The sexual politics of being watched. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1172–1191. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs033
54.
MorwitzV. G.FitzsimonsG. J. (2004). The mere-measurement effect: Why does measuring intentions change actual behavior?Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_8
55.
MouterN.Vonk NoordergarfD. M. (2012). Intercoder reliability for qualitative research: You win some, but do you lose some as well? In Proceedings of the 12th TRAIL congress (pp. 30–31). TRAIL Research School.
56.
NaikN.PhilipoomJ.RaskarR.HidalgoC. (2014). Streetscore - Predicting the perceived safety of one million streetscapes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (pp. 779–785). IEEE.
OrdonezV.BergT. L. (2014). Learning high-level judgements of urban perception. In FlettD.PajdlaT.SchieleB.TuytelaarsT. (Eds.), Computer vision - ECCV 2014. 13th European Conference Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014 Proceedings, Part VI (pp. 494–510).Springer.
PánekJ.MařincováL.PutalováL.HájekJ.MarekL. (2017a). Crowdsourcing of environmental health quality perceptions: A pilot study of Kroměříž, Czech Republic. In LeitnerM.ArsanjaniJ. J. (Eds.), Citizen empowered mapping. Geotechnologies and the environment. (Vol. 18, pp. 261–280). Springer.
61.
PánekJ.PásztoV.MarekL. (2017b). Mapping emotions: Spatial distribution of safety perception in the city of Olomouc. In IvanI.SingletonA.HorákJ.InspektorT. (Eds.), The rise of big spatial data. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer.
62.
PánekJ.PásztoV.ŠimáčekP. (2018). Spatial and temporal comparison of safety perception in urban spaces. Case study of Olomouc, Opava and Jihlava. In IvanI.HorákJ.InspektorT. (Eds.), Dynamics in Glscience. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 333–346). Springer.
63.
Pletikosa CvijijkI.KadarC.IvanB.TeY. F. (2015). Towards a crowdsourcing approach for crime prevention. In UbiComp/ISWC’15 Adjunct Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 1367–1372). Association for Computing Machinery.
64.
PődörA.RévészA.RácskaiP.SasvárZ. (2016). Measuring citizens’ fear of crime using a web application: A case study. GI_Forum, 2, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2016_02_s123
65.
PorziL.Rota BulòS.LepriB.RicciE. (2015). Predicting and understanding urban perception with Convolutional Neural Networks. In MM ‘15 Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia (pp. 139–148). Association for Computing Machinery.
66.
RollwagenH. (2014). The relationship between dwelling type and fear of crime. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514540459
67.
SalessesP.SchechtnerK.HidalgoC. A. (2013). The collaborative image of the city: Mapping the inequality of urban perception. PLoS ONE, 8(7), Article e68400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068400
68.
San JuanC.VozmedianoL.VergaraA. I. (2010). Self-protective behaviour against crime in urban settings: Diagnosis through surveys and Geographic Information Systems. Psyecology, 1(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119710791175623
69.
SidebottomA. L.WortleyR. (2015). Environmental criminology. In PiqueroA. (Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 156–181). Wiley.
70.
SolymosiR.BowersK. (2018). The role of innovative data collection methods in advancing criminological understanding. In BruinsmaG. J. N.JohnsonS. D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental criminology (pp. 210–237). Oxford University Press.
71.
SolymosiR.BowersK.FujiyamaT. (2015). Mapping fear of crime as a context-dependent everyday experience that varies in space and time. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12076
72.
SolymosiR.BowersK. J.FujiyamaT. (2017). Crowdsourcing subjective perceptions of neighbourhood disorder: Interpreting bias in open data. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(4), 944–967. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azx048
73.
TraunmuellerM.MarshallP.CapraL. (2015). Crowdsourcing safety perceptions of people: Opportunities and limitations. In LiuT. Y.ScollonC. N.ZhuW. (Eds.), Social informatics. 7th International Conference, SocInfo 2015 (pp. 120–135). Springer.
74.
TraunmuellerM.MarshallP.CapraL. (2016). “. . . when you’re a stranger”: Evaluating safety perceptions of (un)familiar urban places. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on IoT in Urban Space (pp. 71–77). Association for Computing Machinery.
75.
TukeyJ. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
76.
VozmedianoL.AzanzaM.VillamaneM. (2017). Desarrollando y probando una app para analizar la influencia de la seguridad percibida en la movilidad a pie: un trabajo multidisciplinar con profesorado y alumnado de Psicología e Ingeniería. In Proceedings of the Seminar “La educación, base para los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible, Grupo 4 Paz y participación” (p. 13). University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU.
77.
WarrM. (2000). Fear of crime in the United States: Avenues for research and policy. National Institute of Justice.
78.
WortleyR.MazerolleL. (2008). Environmental criminology and crime analysis: situating the theory, analytic approach and application. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 1–18). Willan.
