Two studies tested littering norm activation by trash can design. The first was a scenario study using a 4 (norm type: social injunctive vs. social descriptive vs. personal vs. control) × 2 (activation type: explicit vs. implicit activation) between-group design, with judgments of a litterer as the dependent variable. Explicit norm activation was more effective than implicit activation. A field study subsequently tested the effect of personal norm activation on actual littering behavior, following a 2 (explicit activation: no vs. yes) × 2 (Implicit activation: no vs. yes) between-group design. Here, both explicit activation through a verbal prompt and implicit activation through design had significant effects, reducing the amount of litter by 50%. A post hoc survey revealed significant effects of age and gender on the personal norm against littering. These findings helped explain the absence of norm activation effects in the youngest age group as found in the field study.
Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). The silence of the library: Environmental control over social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18-28.
2.
Baltes, M.M., & Haywood, S.C. (1976). Application and evaluation of strategies to reduce pollution: Behavioral control of littering in a football stadium. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 501-506.
3.
Bargh, J.A., Gollwitzer, P.M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014-1027.
4.
Beverage Industry Environment Council. (1997 ). Littering behavior studies III, Measuring environmentally desirable behavior. Sydney, New South Wales: Author.
5.
Burgess, R.L., Clark, R.N., & Hendee, J.C. (1971). An experimental analysis of anti-litter procedures . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 71-75.
6.
Casy, L., & Lloyd, M. (1977). Cost and effectiveness of litter removal procedures in an amusement park. Environment and Behavior, 9, 535-546.
7.
Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 324-332.
8.
Chapman, C., & Risley, T.R. (1974). Anti-litter procedures in an urban high-density area. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 377-383.
9.
Christensen, P.N., Rothgerber, H., Wood, W., & Matz, D.C. (2004). Social norms and identity relevance: A motivational approach to normative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1295-1309.
10.
Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., & Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
11.
Cope, J.G., & Geller, E.S. (1984). Community-based interventions to increase the use of automobile litterbags. Journal of Resource Management and Technology, 13, 127-184.
12.
Durdan, C.A., Reeder, G.D., & Hecht, P.R. (1985). Litter in a university cafeteria: Demographic data and the use of prompts as an intervention strategy. Environment and Behavior, 17, 387-404.
13.
Duval, S., & Wicklund, R.A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness . New York: Academic Press.
14.
Dwyer, W.O., Leeming, F.C., Cobern, M.K., Porter, B.E., & Jackson, J.M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980. Environment and Behavior, 25, 275-321.
15.
Finnie, W.C. (1973). Field experiments in litter control. Environment and Behavior, 5, 123-144.
16.
Fogg, B.J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
17.
Geller, E.S., Brasted, W., & Mann, M. (1980). Waste receptacle designs as interventions for litter control. Journal of Environmental Systems, 9, 145-160.
18.
Geller, E.S., Winett, R.A., & Everett, P.B. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change. New York: Pergamon .
19.
Geller, E.S., Witmer, J.F., & Tuso, M.E. (1977). Environmental interventions for litter control . Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 344-351.
20.
Gendrich, J.G., McNees, M.P., Schnelle, J.F., Beegle, G.P., & Clark, H.B. (1982). A student-based anti-litter program for elementary schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 5, 321-335.
21.
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.
22.
Grasmick, H.G., Bursik, R.J., & Kinsey, K.A. (1991). Shame and embarrassment as deterrents to noncompliance with the law: The case of an antilittering campaign. Environment and Behavior, 23, 233-251.
23.
Huffman, K.T. (1995). Litter reduction: A review and integration of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 27, 153-183.
24.
IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C.J.H., Eggen, J.H., & van den Hoven, E.A.W.H. (2006). Persuasive technology for human well-being: Setting the scene. In W. A. IJsselsteijn, Y. A. W. de Kort , C. J. H. Midden, J. H. Eggen, & E. A. W. H. van den Hoven (Eds.), Persuasive technology (Vol. 3962, pp. 1-5), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
25.
Kallgren, C.A., Reno, R.R., & Cialdini, R.B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002-1012.
26.
Krauss, R.M., Freedman, J.L., &Whitcup, M. (1978). Field and laboratory studies of littering. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 109-122.
27.
McCalley, L.T., & Midden, C.J.H. (2002). Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation . Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 589-603.
28.
Nordlund, A.M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 339-347.
29.
Redström, J. (2006). Persuasive design: Fringes and foundations. In W. A. IJsselsteijn, Y. A. W. de Kort, C. J. H. Midden, J. H. Eggen, & E. A. W. H. van den Hoven (Eds.), Persuasive technology (Vol. 3962, pp. 112-122), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
30.
Reiter, S.M., & Samuel, W. (1980). Littering as a function of prior litter and the presence or absence of prohibitive signs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 45-55.
31.
Reno, R.R., Cialdini, R.B., & Kallgren, C.A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 64, 104-112.
32.
Schwartz, S. (1975). The justice of need and the activation of humanitarian norms. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 111-137.
