Based on spatial analysis, network analysis, self-assessment questionnaires, field discussions and accounting documents, the authors discuss how workplace design and spatial layout support productivity in a communication design organization. The authors suggest that the impact of design goes beyond supporting more intense patterns of interaction and smoother flows of information. Workplace design and layout provide an intelligible framework within which collective knowledge is continuously explored, represented, interpreted, and transformed in relation to ongoing projects. Thus, the structure of space supports an organizational culture with cognitive functions.
Allen, T. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Bafna, S. (2003). Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 17-25.
3.
Brill, M., Margulis, S., Konar, E., & Bosti (1984). Using office design to increase productivity. Buffalo, NY: Workplace Design and Productivity.
4.
Brill, M., Weidemann, S., Alard, L., Olson, J., & Keable, E. (2001) Disproving widespread myths about workplace design . Jasper, IN: Kimball International .
5.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G.M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
6.
Cross, R., Borgatti, S.P., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25-46.
7.
Duffy, F. (1974). Office design and organizations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1, 11-118, 217-236.
8.
Duffy, F. (1992). The changing workplace. London : Phaidon Press.
9.
Duffy, F., Cave, C., & Worthington, J. (1976). Planning office space . London: The Architectural Press .
10.
Etzioni, A., (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations . New York: The Free Press.
11.
Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification . Social Networks, 5(3), 215-239.
12.
Gouldner, A.W. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press.
13.
Grajewski, T. (1993). The SAS head office — spatial configuration and interaction patterns. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 2, 63-74.
14.
Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Hillier, B., Hanson, J., & Peponis, J. (1984) What do we mean by building function? In J. A. Powell, I. Cooper, & S. Lera (Eds.), Design for building utilization (pp. 61-72). London: Spon.
16.
Hillier, B., Penn, A. (1991). Visible colleges: Structure and randomness in the place of discovery. Science in Context, 1(4), 23-49.
17.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Neimenen, J. (1974). On centrality in a graph. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, 322-336.
19.
Penn, A., Desyllas, J., Vaughan, L. (1999). The space of innovation: Interaction and communication in the work environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(2), 193-218.
20.
Peponis, J. (1985). The spatial culture of factories. Human Relations, 38, 357-390.
Peponis, J., & Wineman, J. (2002). The spatial structure of environment and behavior . In R. Bechtel & A. Churchman(Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 271-291). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
23.
Peponis, J., Wineman, J., Bafna, S., Rashid, M., & Kim, S.H. (1998). On the generation of linear representations of spatial configuration. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 559-576.
24.
Perrow, C. (1970). Organizational analysis. London : Tavistock.
25.
Peters, T.J. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Warner Books.
26.
Pile, J. (1978). Open office planning. London : Architectural Press.
27.
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E.W. (2001). Networks, diversity and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organizational Science, 12(4), 502-517.
28.
Roethlisberger, J., & Dickson, W.J. (1939). Management and the worker. Boston: Harvard University Press.
29.
Rubinstein, S. (2000). The impact of co-management on quality performance: The case of the Saturn organization. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53(2), 197- 218.
30.
Rulke, D.L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distribution of knowledge, group network structure and group performance. Management Science, 46(5), 612-625.
31.
Serrato, M., & Wineman, J. (1999) Spatial and communication patterns in R&D facilities . In. L. Amorim & F. Dufaux (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Space Syntax Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 11.1-11.8). Distrito Federal, Brazil: Fundação de Apoio á Pesquisa do Distrito Federal.
32.
Sparrowe, R.T., Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., & Kraimer, M.L. (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325.
33.
Tichy, N., Tushman, M.L., & Fombrun, C. (1979) Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review1979, 4(4), 507-519.
Turner, A., Doxa, M., O'Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001) From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning (B): Planning and Design, 28, 103-121.
36.
Turner, A., Penn, A., & Hillier, B. (2005). An algorithmic definition of the axial map. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32, 425-444.
37.
Van den Bulte, C., & Moenaert, R.K. (1998). The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing and manufacturing . Management Science, 44(11), S1-S18.
38.
Wineman, J.D. (1986). The importance of office design to organizational effectiveness and productivity. In J. D. Wineman (Ed.), Behavioral issues in office design (pp. ix-xvii). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
39.
Wineman, J.D., & Serrato, M. (1998). Facility design for high-performance teams. In E. Sundstrom (Ed.), Supporting Work Team Effectiveness (271-298). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
