Previous research has suggested that the layout of urban spaces can have a substantial influence on how people navigate through those spaces. However, to date, few studies have directly investigated how changes in layout interact with changes in visual field to shape a person’s route choice. Across two experiments, the influence of visual field and spatial layout was manipulated using virtual reality. It was found that route choice was significantly influenced by the configuration of a space—The more consistently organized environment led to more systematic route choices. However, limiting the perception of distant visual information was found to influence route choice in a similar but completely independent way. These findings suggest that navigation in urban spaces is dependent on the interaction between topology and the visual features of the space, where greater visual field and a consistently organized spatial layout lead to maximally efficient route choices.
AlfanoP. L.MichelG. F. (1990). Restricting the field of view: Perceptual and performance effects. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 70, 35-45.
2.
BailensonJ. N.ShumM. S.UttalD. H. (2000). The initial segment strategy: A heuristic for route selection. Memory & Cognition, 28, 306-318.
3.
BenediktM. L. (1979). To take hold of space: Isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6(1), 47-65.
4.
ChambersW. W. (1982, April). Visual technology research simulator: Flight simulation avionic systems and aero medical aspects. Presented at the Royal Aeronautical Society’s Flight Simulation Symposium, London, England.
5.
ConroyR. A. (2001). Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Department of Architecture, University College London, England.
6.
Conroy DaltonR. (2003). The secret is to follow your nose: Route path selection and angularity. Environment & Behavior, 35, 107-131.
7.
FrankensteinJ.BüchnerS. J.TenbrinkT.HölscherC. (2010). Influence of geometry and objects on local route choices for wayfinding. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6222, 41-53.
8.
HaqS. (2003). Investigating the syntax line: Configurational properties and cognitive correlates. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 841-863.
9.
HaqS.ZimringC. (2003). Just down the road a piece: The development of topological knowledge of building layouts. Environment & Behavior, 35, 132-160.
10.
HillierB. (1996). Space is the machine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
HillierB.BurdettR.PeponisJ.PennA. (1987). Creating life: Or, does architecture determine anything?Architecture and Behavior, 3, 233-250.
12.
HillierB.HansonJ. (1984). The social logic of space (Paperback Edition 1988). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
HillierB.IidaS. (2005). Network and psychological effects in urban movement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3693, 475-490.
14.
HillierB.PennA.HansonJ.GrajewskiT.XuJ. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 29-66.
15.
HölscherC.BrösamleM.VrachliotisG. (2012). Challenges in multilevel wayfinding: A case study with the space syntax technique. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39, 63-82.
16.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
KaplanS.KaplanR. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. New York, NY: Praeger.
18.
LynchK. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
MontelloD. R. (1991). Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: A field study. Environment & Behavior, 23, 47-69.
20.
MontelloD. R. (1997). The perception and cognition of environmental distance: Direct sources of information. In HirtleS. C.FrankA. U. (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 297-311). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
21.
PennA. (2003). Space syntax and spatial cognition: Or why the axial line?Environment & Behavior, 35, 30-65.
22.
PennA.HillierB.BanisterD.XuJ. (1998a). Configurational modeling of urban movement networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 25, 59-84.
23.
PennA.HillierB.BanisterD.XuJ. (1998b). Configurational modeling of urban movement networks. In OrtuzarJ.HensharD.Jara-DiazS. (Eds.), Travel behavior research: Updating the state of play (pp. 339-362). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
24.
PeponisJ.ZimringC.ChoiY. K. (1990). Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment & Behavior, 22, 555-590.
25.
PiantanidaT. P.BomanD.LarimerJ.GilleJ.ReedC. (1992). Studies of the field-of-view/resolution tradeoff in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the SPIE: Human Vision, Visual Processing and Digital Display III (Vol. 1666, pp. 448–456). Bellingham, WA: SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering.
26.
PierceC. A.BlockR. A.AguinisH. (2004). Cautionary note on reporting eta-squared values from multifactor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 916-924.
27.
SadallaE. K.MontelloD. R. (1989). Remembering changes in direction. Environment & Behavior, 21, 346-363.
28.
SadallaE. K.StaplinL. J. (1980). The perception of traversed distance, intersections. Environment & Behavior, 12, 167-182.
29.
TurnerA. (2003). Analysing the visual dynamics of spatial morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 657-676.
30.
TurnerA.PennA. (2002). Encoding natural movement as an agent-based system: An investigation into human pedestrian behaviour in the built environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 473-490.
31.
WarrenW. H.KayB. A.ZoshW. D.DuchonA. P.SahucS. (2001). Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 213-216.
32.
WarrenW. H.KurtzK. J. (1992). The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 443-454.
33.
WarrenW. H.MorrisM. W.KalishM. (1988). Perception of translational heading from optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 646-660.
34.
WienerJ. M.HölscherC.BüchnerS.KoniecznyL. (2009). How the geometry of space controls visual attention during spatial decision making. In TaatgenN. A.van RijnH. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2286-2291). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
