There is little evidence about how path-design characteristics at site and building scale may be related to where active older adults choose to walk. This article describes the findings from an empirical study examining the relationship between physical environmental characteristics of path segments and their use for walking for recreation or instrumental reasons by 114 active residents on three retirement community campuses. The study uses a combination of methods—resident questionnaires, path assessment, and morphological analysis of building and campus plans. Path use for instrumental walking was related to path segments being well-connected in the path network and having specific destinations along them. Path segments that were likely to be selected for recreational walking at the three case study sites were longer, were well connected, did not have steps, and had attractive views of campus.
American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging. (2005). The continuing care retirement communities 2004 profile. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Bafna, S. (2003). Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 17-29.
3.
Bafna, S., & Zhang, Z. (2005). Space syntax application extension to GIS software [unpublished software]. Atlanta, GA: College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology.
4.
Ball, K., Bauman, A., Leslie, E., & Owen, N. (2001). Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Preventive Medicine, 33(5), 434-440.
5.
Boarnet, M., Day, K., Alfonzo, M., Forsyth, A., & Oakes, M. (2006). The Irvine-Minnesota Inventory to measure built environments: Reliability tests, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 153-159.
6.
Booth, M. L. (2000). Assessment of physical activity: An international perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(2), 114-120.
7.
Booth, M. L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., Clavisi, O., & Leslie, E. (2000). Social-cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Preventive Medicine, 31(1), 15-22.
8.
Brownson, R., Baker, E., Housemann, R., Brennan, L., & Bacak, S. (2001). Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 91(12), 1995-2003.
9.
Carnegie, M. A., Bauman, A., Marshall, A. L., Mohsin, M., Westley-Wise, V., & Booth, M. L. (2002). Perceptions of the physical environment, stage of change for physical activity, and walking among Australian adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(2), 146-155.
10.
Centers for Disease Control. (1999). Neighborhood safety and the prevalence of physical inactivity—Selected states, 1996. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48(7), 143-146.
11.
Clark, D. O. (1999). Physical activity and its correlates among urban primary care patients aged 55 years or older. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54B(1), S41-S48.
12.
Day, K., Boarnet, M., Alfonzo, M., & Forsyth, A. (2006). The Irvine-Minnesota Inventory to measure built environments: Development. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 144-152.
13.
Feskanich, D., Willett, W., & Colditz, G. (2002). Walking and leisure-time activity and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(18), 2300-2306.
14.
Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002). The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Social Science and Medicine, 54(12), 1793-1812.
15.
Haq, S., & Zimring, C. (2003). Just down the road a piece: The development of topological knowledge of building layouts. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 132-160.
16.
Harris-Kojetin, L., Kiefer, K., Joseph, A., & Zimring, C. (2005). Encouraging physical activity among retirement community residents—The role of campus commitment, programming, staffing, promotion, financing and accreditation. Senior Housing and Care Journal, 13(1), 3-20.
17.
Healey, J. H. (1999). Statistics: A tool for social research (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
18.
Henderson, K. A., & Ainsworth, B. E. (2000). Enablers and constraints to walking for older African American and American Indian women: The cultural activity participation study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(4), 313-321.
19.
Hoehner, C. M., Brennan Ramirez, L. K., Elliott, M. B., Handy, S. L., & Brownson, R. C. (2005). Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2, Suppl 2), 105-116.
20.
Howell, S. (1980). Designing for aging: Patterns of use. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Humpel, N., Owen, N., Iverson, D., Leslie, E., & Bauman, A. (2004). Perceived environment attributes, residential location, and walking for particular purposes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26(2), 119-125.
22.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Short last 7 days self-administered format. (2002). Retrieved October 2005, from www.ipaq.ki.se.dloads/IPAQ_SHORT_LAST_7_SELF_ADM-revised_8-23-02.doc
23.
Joseph, A., Zimring, C., Harris-Kojetin, L., & Kiefer, K. (2005). Presence and visibility of outdoor and indoor physical activity features and participation in physical activity among older adults in retirement communities. In S. Rodiek & B. Schwarz (Eds.), The role of the outdoors in residential environments for aging (pp. 141-166). New York: Haworth..
24.
King, A. C. (2001). Interventions to promote physical activity by older adults. Journals of Gerontology, 56A (Supplement: Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Quality of Life), 34-46.
25.
King, W. C., Brach, J. S., Belle, S., Killingsworth, R., Fenton, M., & Kriska, A. M. (2003). The relationship between convenience of destinations and walking levels in older women. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18, 74-82.
26.
Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2006). Correlates of walking for transportation or recreation purposes. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(Suppl 1), S77-S98.
27.
Li, F., Fischer, J., & Brownson, R. (2005). A multilevel analysis of change in neighborhood walking activity in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 13, 145-159.
28.
Owen, N., Humpel, N., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2004). Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, 67-76.
29.
Patla, A. E., & Shumway-Cook, A. (1999). Dimensions of mobility: Defining the complexity and difficulty associated with community mobility. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 7(1), 7-19.
30.
Peponis, J., & Wineman, J. (2002). The spatial structure of environment and behavior: Space syntax. In R. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 271-291). New York: John Wiley.
31.
Pikora, T. J., Bull, F. C. L., Jamrozik, K., Knuiman, M., Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002). Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(3), 187-194.
32.
Regnier, V. (1994). Assisted living housing for the elderly: Design innovations from the United States and Europe. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
33.
Shumway-Cook, A., Patla, A. E., Stewart, A., Ferucci, L., Ciol, M., & Guralnik, J. (2003). Environmental components of mobility disability in community-living older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 393-398.
34.
Suminski, R. R., Poston, W. S. C., Petosa, R. L., Stevens, E., & Katzenmoyer, L. M. (2005). Features of the neighborhood environment and walking by U.S. adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 149-155.
35.
Tudor-Locke, C., Jones, G. R., Myers, A. M., Paterson, D. H., & Ecclestone, N. (2002). Contribution of structured exercise class participation and informal walking for exercise to daily physical activity in community-dwelling older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(3), 350-356.
36.
Zimring, C., Joseph, A., Nicoll, G. L., & Tsepas, S. (2005). Influences of building design and site design on physical activity: Research and intervention opportunities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2, Suppl 2), 186-193.
