This article presents a new approach to the investigation of resident views of neighborhood using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). GIS, an interactive mapping and analysis tool, allows multiple layers of information about a given place to be represented simultaneously, thus exposing the interactions among layers, and allows the conception of neighborhood to be represented in greater complexity. The results of a study of the neighborhood evaluations of 18 respondents in Urbana, Illinois, in which GIS was used to facilitate neighborhood evaluation, are described and analyzed. The article first presents an overview of the literature on neighborhood evaluation, followed by a description of the methodology, including a brief overview of GIS capabilities and how GIS was used to elicit responses in a survey of neighborhood residents. A final section summarizes the results of the survey and identifies some of the main findings of the evaluative method.
Adams, R.E. (1992). A tale of two cities: Community sentiments and community evaluation in Indianapolis and Pittsburgh. Sociological Focus, 25(3), 217-240.
2.
Aitken, S., Stutz, F., Prosser, R., & Chandler, R. (1993). Neighborhood integrity and resident's familiarity: Using a geographic information system to investigate place identity. Tjidschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 84(1), 2-12.
3.
Aitken, S.C., & Prosser, R. (1990). Residents' spatial knowledge of neighborhood continuity and form. Geographical Analysis, 22, 301-326.
4.
Al-Kodmany, K. (1998, October). GIS and the artist: Shaping the image of a neighborhood in participatory environmental design. Position paper presented at Project Varenius Specialist Meeting: Empowerment, Marginalization and Public Participation GIS, Santa Barbara, CA [Online]. Available at www.ncgia.ucsb/varenius/ppgis/papers>
5.
Appleyard, D. (1970). Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment and Behavior, 2, 100-117.
6.
Appleyard, D. (1976). Planning a pluralist city: Conflicting realities in Ciudad Guayana. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Baldassare, M., & Wilson, G. (1995). More trouble in paradise? Urbanization and the decline in suburban quality-of-life ratings. Urban Affairs Review, 30(5), 690-708.
8.
Banerjee, T., & Baer, W.C. (1984). Beyond the neighborhood unit: Residential environments and public policy. New York: Plenum .
9.
Banyard, V.L., & Miller, K.E. (1998). The powerful potential of qualitative research for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology , 26(4), 485-505.
10.
Bardo, J.W. (1984). A reexamination of the neighborhood as a socio-spatial schema. Sociological Inquiry, 54(3), 346-358.
11.
Bosworth, M., & Donovan, J. (1998, October). A mapmaker's dream: Public involvement applications utilization of GIS. Position paper presented at Project Varenius Specialist Meeting: Empowerment, Marginalization and Public Participation GIS, Santa Barbara, CA [Online]. Available at www.ncgia.ucsb/varenius/ppgis/papers>
12.
Buttimer, A. (1972). Social space and the planning of residential areas . Environment and Behavior, 4, 279-318.
13.
Chang, K. (1997). The design of a web-based geographic information system for community participation. Unpublished master's thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo. Available at www.geog.buffalo.edu/~jkrygier/
14.
Chavis, D.M., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development . American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 55-81.
15.
Clark, W.A.V., & Cadwallader, M.T. (1973). Residential preferences: An alternate view of intra-urban space. Environment and Planning A, 5, 693-703.
16.
Cook, C.C. (1988). Components of neighborhood satisfaction: Responses from urban and suburban single-parent women. Environment and Behavior, 20(2), 115-149.
17.
Congress for the New Urbanism. (2000). Charter of the new urbanism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Cooley, C.H. (1918). Social process. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
19.
Dahmann, D. (1985). Assessments of neighborhood quality in urban America . Urban Affairs Quarterly, 20(4), 511-535.
20.
Ellen, I.G., & Turner, M.A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence . Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 833-866.
21.
Evans, G.W., & Garling, T. (1991). Environment, cognition, and action: An integrated approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Freudenberg, W.R. (1986). The density of acquaintanceship: An overlooked variable in community research?American Journal of Sociology , 92(1), 27-63.
23.
Franck, K.A. (1984). Exorcising the ghost of physical determinism. Environment and Behavior, 16(4), 411-435.
24.
Gans, H. (1967). The Levittowners. New York : Random House.
25.
Golledge, R.G. (1978). Learning about urban environments. In T. Carlstein, D. Parkes, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Timing space and spacing time (Vol. 1, pp. 76-98). London : Edward Arnold.
26.
Golledge, R.G. (1987). Environmental cognition. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 131-171). New York: John Wiley.
27.
Golledge, R.G. (1990). The conceptual and empirical basis of a general theory of spatial knowledge. In M. M. Fischer , P. Nijkamp, & Y. Y. Papageorgiou (Eds.), Spatial choices and processes (pp. 147-168). Amsterdam: North-HollandElsevier Science Publishers B. V.
28.
Gould, P. (1973). On mental maps. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.), Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior (pp. 182-222). Chicago: Aldine.
29.
Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
30.
Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (1998). Empowerment, marginalization and “community-integrated ” GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems , 25(2), 67-76.
31.
Howard, E. (1898). To-morrow: A peaceful path to real reform. London: Swan Sonnenschein.
32.
Hunter, A. (1979). The urban neighborhood: Its analytical and social contexts. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14(3), 267-288.
33.
Jablonsky, T.J. (1993). Pride in the jungle: Community and everyday life in back of the yardsChicago. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
Jackson, K. (1985). Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. London: Oxford University Press.
35.
Jacob, S.G., & Willits, F.K. (1994). Objective and subjective indicators of community evaluation: A Pennsylvania assessment. Social Indicators Research , 32, 161-177.
36.
Knox, P. (1995). Urban social geography. Essex , UK: Longman.
37.
Kretzmann, J.P., & McKnight, J.L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets . Chicago: ACTA Publications.
38.
Krygier, J.B. (1998, October). The praxis of public participation GIS and visualization. Position paper presented at Project Varenius Specialist Meeting: Empowerment, Marginalization, and Public Participation GIS, Santa Barbara, CA [Online]. Available at www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/varenius/ppgis/papers>
39.
Lee, T. ( 1968). Urban neighborhood as a socio-spatial schema. Human Relations, 21, 241-268.
40.
Lee, T. ( 1970). Urban neighborhoods as a socio-spatial schema. In H. M. Proshansky (Ed.), Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting (pp. 349-370). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
41.
Logan, J.R., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
Marans, R.W., & Rodgers, W. (1975). Toward an understanding of community satisfaction . In A. H. Hawley & V. P. Rock (Eds.), Metropolitan America in contemporary perspective (pp. 299-352). New York: John Wiley.
44.
McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
45.
Michelson, W.H. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
Milgram, S., & Jodelet, D. (1976). Psychological maps of Paris. In H. Proshansky, W. Ittleson , & L. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental psychology: People and their physical settings (pp. 104-124). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
47.
Nasar, J.L. (1998). The evaluative image of the city. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Nasar, J.L., & Julian, D.A. (1995). The psychological sense of community in the neighborhood . Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(2), 178-184.
49.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Simon & Schuster .
50.
O'Brien, D.J., & Ayidiya, S. (1991). Neighborhood community and life satisfaction. Journal of the Community Development Society, 22(1), 21-37.
51.
Olson, P. (1982). Urban neighborhood research: its development and current focus. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 17(4), 491-518.
52.
Park, R.E., Burgess, E.W., & McKenzie, R.D. (1925). The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Perry, C.A. (1929). The neighborhood unit: A scheme of arrangement for the family-life community (Regional study of New York and its environs, VIII, neighborhood and community planning, Monograph 1, pp. 2-140). New York: Regional Plan of New York and its Environs.
54.
Pocock, D., & Hudson, R. (1978). Images of the urban environment. London: Macmillan.
55.
Rapoport, A. (1990). The meaning of the built environment. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
56.
Rivlin, L.G. (1987). The neighborhood, personal identity, and group affiliations. In I. Altman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Neighborhoods and community (pp. 1-34). New York: Plenum.
57.
St. John, C. (1987). Racial differences in neighborhood evaluation standards. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22(3), 377-398.
58.
Sampson, R.J. (1991). Linking the micro and macro level dimensions of community social organization. Social Forces, 70(1), 43-64.
59.
Sawicki, D.S., & Flynn, P. (1996). Neighborhood indicators: A review of the literature and an assessment of conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2), 165-183.
60.
Shiffer, M.J. (1998). Multimedia GIS for planning support and public discourse. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems , 25(2), 89-94.
61.
Silver, C. (1985). Neighborhood planning in historical perspective . Journal of the American Planning Association, 51(2), 161-174.
62.
Suchan, T.A., & Brewer, C.A. (2000). Qualitative methods for research on mapmaking and map use. Professional Geographer, 52(1), 145-154.
63.
Talen, E. (2000). Bottom-up GIS: A new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(3), 279-294.
64.
Taylor, R.B. (1996). Neighborhood responses to disorder and local attachments: The systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighborhood use value. Sociological Forum, 11(1), 41-74.
65.
Unger, D.G., & Wandersman, A. (1985). The importance of neighbors: The social, cognitive and affective components of neighboring. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 139-170.
66.
Vreugdenhil, A., & Rigby, K. (1987). Assessing generalized community satisfaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 127(4), 367-374.
Webber, M. (1963). Order in diversity, community without propinquity . In L. Wingo Jr. (Ed.), Cities and space: The future use of urban land (pp. 23-56). Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
Wekerle, G.R. (1985). From refuge to service center: Neighborhoods that support women. Sociological Focus, 18(2), 79-95.
70.
Zube, E.H. (1980). Environmental evaluation: Perception and public policy. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole .
