Brownfields have the potential to be reused as nature preserves or recreation areas. This reuse depends on the public’s perceptions of risk and their willingness to support the new uses of the sites. This study examines attitudes about the reuse of large coastal brownfields from local and nonlocal students and the public. The sites include the buffer area surrounding a nuclear power plant, an area contaminated by a chemical spill, and a ranch (which was used as a control site). The results show that all the samples are more supportive of the establishment of nature preserves with human access than either nature preserves without access or developed recreation areas. Limits on human access to the sites are more acceptable for the contaminated sites and more acceptable to the nonlocal samples.
Alhakami, A., & Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 1085-1096.
2.
Baum, A., Fleming, R., & Davidson, L. (1983). Natural disaster and technological catastrophe. Environment and Behavior, 15(3), 333-354.
3.
Beatley, T., Brower, D., & Schwab, A. (2002). An introduction to coastal zone management (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.
4.
Burger, J., Sanchez, J., Gibbons, J., & Gochfeld, M. (1997). Risk perception, federal spending, and the Savannah River site: Attitudes of hunters and fishermen. Risk Analysis, 17(3), 313-320.
5.
Burger, J., Sanchez, J., Gibbons, J., Ondrof, J., Ramos, R., McMahon, M., et al. (1999).Attitudes and perceptions about ecological resources and hazards of people living around the Savannah River Site. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 57(2), 195-211.
6.
Burger, J., Sanchez, J., Roush, D., & Gochfeld, M. (2001). Risk perception, future land use and stewardship: Comparison of attitudes about Hanford site and Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. Journal of Environmental Management, 61(4), 265-280.
7.
Cohen, T. (1997). Ecological restoration. Technology Review, 95(2), 20-21.
8.
Collins, P., Ng, A., & Ramanujam, R. (1998). Superfund success, superfast. Civil Engineering, 68(12), 42-46.
9.
Department of Energy. (2002). National environmental research parks. Retrieved December 8, 2005, from http://nerp.esd.ornl.gov/
10.
Destry, J. (2002). Brownfields—Greenfields—And environmental justice. Parks and Recreation, 37(3), 1-2.
11.
Edelstein, M. (1988). Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Boulder, CO: Westview.
12.
Greenberg, M., Miller, K., Lowrie, K., & Mayer, H. (2001). Surveying the land: Brownfields in medium-sized and small communities. Public Management, 83(1), 18-23.
13.
Gregory, R., Flynn, J., & Slovic, P. (1995). Technological stigma. American Scientist, 83(3),220-223.
14.
Johnson, B., & DeRosa, C. (1997).The toxicological hazard of Super fund hazardous waste sites. Reviews on Environmental Health, 12, 235-235.
15.
Kasperson, R., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H., Emel, J., Goble, R., et al. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177-187.
16.
Kline, J. (2001). Tourism and natural resource management: A general overview of research and issues. Untied States Forest Service general technical report (Report No. PNW-GTR-506). Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
17.
Knowlton, R., & Minier, J. (2001). Recent trend for environmental compliance provides new opportunities for land and water use at brownfields and other contaminated sites. Natural Resources Journal, 41(4), 919-943.
18.
Kraus, N., Malmfors, T., & Slovic, P. (1992). Intuitive toxicology: Expert and lay judgments of chemical risks. Risk Analysis, 12, 215-232.
19.
Levi, D., & Kocher, S. (2001). Technological disasters in natural and built environments. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 78-92.
20.
Lindell, M., & Earle, T. (1983). How close is close enough: Public perceptions of the risks of industrial facilities. Risk Analysis, 3, 245-254.
21.
McDaniels, T., Axelrod, L., & Slovic, P. (1995). Characterizing perception of ecological risk. Risk Analysis, 15(5), 575-588.
22.
Mieczkowski, Z. (1995). Environmental issues of tourism and recreation. New York: University Press of America.
23.
National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration. (2002). Managing coastal resources. Retrieved July 8, 2002, from http://state-of-coast.noaa.gov
24.
Norris, R. (1992). Can ecotourism save natural areas?National Parks, 66(1), 30-35.
25.
Page, W. (1997). Contaminated sites and environmental cleanup. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
Rogers, G. (1984). Residential proximity, perceived and acceptable risk. In R. Waller & V. Covello (Eds.), Low probability/high consequence risk analysis: Issues, methods, and case studies (pp. 507-520). New York: Plenum.
27.
Rogers, G. (1997). The dynamics of risk perception: How does perceived risk respond to risk events?Risk Analysis, 17(6), 745-757.
28.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
29.
Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13(6), 675-682.
30.
Slovic, P. (1997). Public perception of risk. Journal of Environmental Health, 59(9), 22-25.
31.
Slovic, P., Malmfors, T., Krewski, D., Mertz, C., Neil, N., & Bartlett, S. (1995). Intuitive toxicology. II. Expert and lay judgments of chemical risks in Canada. Risk Analysis, 15(6),661-675.
32.
Weinstein, N. (1989). Optimistic biases about personal risk. Science, 246, 1232-1233.
