What Makes Customers Bring Their Bags or Buy Bags from the Shop? A Survey of Customers at a Taiwan Hypermarket

Abstract

The Taiwan government had implemented a restriction policy to cut down the overuse of plastic shopping bags. Under this policy, hypermarkets and many other stores are prohibited from offering free plastic shopping bags. They can only sell them. This studywas aimed to use a set of psychological and situational variables to predict customer's bag-use behaviors, which included bringing one's own bag and buying bags from the hypermarket. The predictors were attitude toward the behavior, environmental concern, and personal norm (or ACN); self-efficacy of bringing bags; self-efficacy of not requesting bags; response efficacy; and situational variables. Results showed that our model could predict both bag-bringing and bag-buying behaviors. Self-efficacy of bringing bags was the main variable that determined whether customers would bring their bags to shopping, whereas situational variables determined whether customerswould buy bags. Implications of these results and suggestions for the policy practices are discussed.

Keywords

theory of planned behavior response efficacy waste prevention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavorial change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Baron, R. M. ,& Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Block, L. G. , & Keller, P. A. (1998). Beyond protection motivation: An integrative theory of health appeals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1580-1608.

de Oliver, M. (1999). Attitudes and inaction: Acase study of the manifest demographics of urban water conservation. Environment and Behavior, 31, 372-394.

Dietz, T. , Stern, P. C. , & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450-471.

Environmental Protection Administration . (2002a). The purpose of promotion for the restricted use policy on plastic shopping bags and disposable plastic tableware (incl. Styrofoam). Retrieved on October 1, 2004 from http://www.epa.gov.tw/bag/policy.doc

Environmental Protection Administration . (2002b). Environmental white paper. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.

Gardner, G. T. , & Stern, P. C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

10.

Hines, J. M. , Hungerford, H. R. , & Tomera, A. N. (1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: Ameta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.

11.

Hwang, Y. H. , Kim, S. I. , & Jeng, J. M. (2000). Examining the causal relationships among selected antecedents of responsible environmental behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 19-25.

12.

Hypermarkets . (2003). Data of Chang Hwa Bank, 52(7), 93-97.

13.

Jang, H. T. (2003). The comparing study between plastic bags and shopping bags by the life cycle assessment. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taichung Normal College, Taichung, Taiwan.

14.

Jayanti, R. K. , & Burns, A. C. (1998). The antecedents of preventive health care behavior: An empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 6-15.

15.

Lam, S.-P. (1999). Predicting intentions to conserve water from the theory of planned behavior, perceived moral obligation and perceivedwater right. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1058-1071.

16.

Lam, S.-P. (in press). Predicting intention to save water: Theory of planned behavior, response efficacy, vulnerability and subjective effectiveness of alternative solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

17.

Lam, S.-P. , & Cheng, S. (2003, December). A comparison of variables affecting three kinds of environmental intention held by members of environmental groups in Taiwan. Paper presented at the 13th Conference on Environmental Management and Urban Development, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

18.

McGuire, W. J. (1989). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns(pp. 43-65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

19.

Stern, P. C. (1992). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Reviewof Psychology, 43, 269-302.

20.

Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.

21.

Stern, P. C. , & Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology(Vol. 2, pp. 1043-1088). New York: John Wiley.

22.

Tarrant, M. A. ,& Cordell, H. K. (1997). The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. Environment and Behavior, 29, 618-637.