Recent neurophysiological findings indicate that there is a region in the brain that responds strongly to enclosure and even more strongly to gaps in enclosure. Under evolutionary theory, that sensitivity could be explained by the effects of enclosure on safety. This article reports four experiments with dependent variables of open or enclosed and safe or threatening and independent variables of gaps, size of gaps, location of gaps, orientation of gaps, boundary height, locomotive permeability, and visual permeability. Impressions of enclosure were much more influenced by visual permeability than by locomotive permeability, but the reverse was found for impressions of safety, which were more strongly influenced by locomotive than by visual permeability.
Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape (Rev. ed.). New York: John Wiley.
2.
Boissy, A. (1995). Fear and fearlessness in animals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 70, 165-191.
3.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1993). Applied regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
6.
Feimer, N. R. (1984). Environmental perception: The effects of media, evaluative context, and observer sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 61-80.
7.
Fisher, B. S., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features prospect, refuge, and escape. Environment and Behavior, 24, 35-65.
8.
Gärling, T. (1969a). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms I: Judgment scales of open and closed space. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 10, 250-256.
9.
Gärling, T. (1969b). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms II: Judgments of open and closed space by category rating and magnitude estimation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 10, 257-268.
10.
Gärling, T. (1970a). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms III: A relation between judged depth and size of space. Scand inavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 124-131.
11.
Gärling, T. (1970b). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms IV: The relation of judged depth to judged size of space under different viewing conditions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 133-145.
12.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Hanyu, K. (1997). Visual properties and affective appraisals in residential areas after dark. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 301-315.
14.
Hayward, S. C., & Franklin, S. S. (1974). Perceived openness-enclosure of architectural space. Environment and Behavior, 6, 37-52.
15.
Hediger, H. (1964). Wild animals in captivity: An outline of the biology of zoological gardens (G. Sircom, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1950)
16.
Hediger, H. (1968). The psychology and behaviour of animals in zoos and circuses (G. Sircom, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1955)
17.
Herzog, T. R., & Chernick, K. K. (2000). Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 29-39.
18.
Herzog, T. R., & Flynn-Smith, J. A. (2001). Preference and perceived danger as a function of the perceived curvature, length, and width of urban alleys. Environment and Behavior, 33, 653-666.
19.
Herzog, T. R., & Kutzli, G. E. (2002). Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings. Environment and Behavior, 34, 819-835.
20.
Herzog, T. R., & Miller, E. J. (1998). The role of mystery in perceived danger and environmental preference. Environment and Behavior, 30, 429-449.
21.
Herzog, T. R., & Smith, G. A. (1988). Danger, mystery, and environmental preference. Environment and Behavior, 20, 320-344.
22.
Hinde, R. A. (1998). Humans and human habitats: Reciprocal influences. In B. Cartledge (Ed.), Mind, brain, and the environment (pp. 6-27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous univariate distributions: Volume 2. New York: John Wiley.
24.
Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M., & Sullivan, W. (1998). Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30, 28-59.
25.
Loewen, L. J., Steel, G. D., & Suedfeld, P. (1993). Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 323-331.
26.
Montgomery, D. C. (1997). Design and analysis of experiments. New York: John Wiley.
27.
Nasar, J. L., & Fisher, B. S. (1993). “Hot spots” of fear and crime: A multi-method investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 187-206.
28.
Nasar, J. L., Fisher, B. S., & Grannis, M. (1993). Proximate physical cues to fear of crime. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 161-178.
29.
Nasar, J. L., & Jones, K. M. (1997). Landscapes of fear and stress. Environment and Behavior, 29, 291-323.
30.
Nasar, J. L., Julian, D., Buchman, S., Humphreys, D., & Mrohaly, M. (1983). The emotional quality of scenes and observation points: A look at prospect and refuge. Landscape Planning, 10, 355-361.
31.
Öhman, A. (1986). Face the beast and fear the face: Animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analysis of emotion. Psychophysiology, 23, 123-145.
32.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1988). Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing (2nded.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
Russell, P. A. (1979). Fear-evoking stimuli. In W. Sluckin (Ed.), Fear in animals and man (pp. 86-124). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
35.
Schroeder, H. W., & Anderson, L. M. (1984). Perception of personal safety in urban recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 178-194.
36.
Shaffer, G. S., & Anderson, L. M. (1983). Perceptions of the security and attractiveness of urban parking lots. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 311-323.
37.
Simpson, J. (1997). The compact edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Stamps, A. E. (1992). Bootstrap investigation of respondent sample size for environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 220-222.
39.
Stamps, A. E. (1993). Simulation effects on environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Management, 38, 115-132.
40.
Stamps, A. E. (1997). A paradigm for distinguishing significant from non-significant visual impacts: Theory, implementation, case histories. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 17, 249-293.
41.
Stamps, A. E. (2000). Psychology and the aesthetics of the built environment. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
42.
Stamps, A. E. (2003). Permeability and environmental enclosure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 1305-1310.
43.
Stamps, A. E. (2005). Enclosure and safety in urbanscapes. Environment and Behavior, 37, 102-133.
44.
Stamps, A. E., & Nasar, J. L. (1997). Design review and public preferences: Effects of geographical location, public consensus, sensation seeking, and architectural styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 11-32.
45.
Stamps, A. E., & Smith, S. G. (2002). Environmental enclosure in urban areas. Environment and Behavior, 34, 781-794.
46.
Thiel, P., Harrison, E. D., & Alden, R. S. (1986). The perception of spatial enclosure as a function of the position of architectural spaces. Environment and Behavior, 18, 227-245.
47.
Warr, M. (1990). Dangerous situations: Social context and fear of victimization. Social Forces, 68, 891-907.
48.
Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
