Previous work in neurophysiology suggests that enclosure is such an important feature of the environment that there is a specific region in the brain responding directly to environmental enclosure. Previous experimental work suggested that 5 environmental features cause impressions of enclosure: the proportion of the scene covered by walls, the proportion of the scene covered by ground, how light or dark the scene is, the depth of view, and the number of sides open at the front of the scene. Direct quantitative replication of these results was obtained for a sample of 21 artificial scenes. Responses of judged safety were also obtained. Safety was most strongly correlated with the lightness of the scene (r = .82).
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Appleton, J. (1996). The experience of landscape. New York: John Wiley. (Original work published 1975)
3.
Appleton, J. (1990). The symbolism of habitat. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
4.
Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To take hold of space: Isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6, 47-65.
5.
Benedikt, M. L., & Burnham, C. A. (1985). Perceiving architectural space: From optic arrays to isovists. In W. H. Warren & R. E. Shaw (Eds.), Persistence and change (pp. 103-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Boissy, A. (1995). Fear and fearlessness in animals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 70(2), 165-191.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1993). Applied regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Darwin, C. (1991). The origin of species. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. (Original work published 1859)
10.
Darwin, C. (1993). The autobiography of Charles Darwin. New York: Norton. (Original work published 1887)
11.
Davis, L. S., & Benedikt, M. L. (1979). Computational models of space: Isovists and isovist fields. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 11, 49-72.
12.
Doxiadis, C. A. (1968). Ekistics: An introduction to the science of human settlements. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
14.
Fernández-Juricic, E., Jimenez, M. D., & Lucas, E. (2001). Alert distance as an alternative measure of bird tolerance to human disturbance: Implications for park design. Environmental Conservation, 28(3), 263-269.
15.
Fisher, B. S., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: Prospect, refuge, and escape. Environment and Behavior, 24(1), 35-65.
16.
Gärling, T. (1969a). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms I: Judgment scales of open and closed space. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 10, 250-256.
17.
Gärling, T. (1969b). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms II: Judgments of open and closed space by category rating and magnitude estimation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 10, 257-268.
18.
Gärling, T. (1970a). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms III: A relation between judged depth and size of space. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 124-131.
19.
Gärling, T. (1970b). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms IV: The relation of judged depth to judged size of space under different viewing conditions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 133-145.
20.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception (1986 ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Basic Books.
22.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
23.
Hanyu, K. (1997). Visual properties and affective appraisals in residential areas after dark. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 301-315.
24.
Hayward, S. C., & Franklin, S. S. (1974). Perceived openness-enclosure of architectural space. Environment and Behavior, 6(1), 37-52.
25.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
Hediger, H. (1950). Wild animals in captivity: An outline of the biology of zoological gardens (1964 ed., G. Sircom, Trans.). New York: Dover.
27.
Hediger, H. (1955). The psychology and behaviour of animals in zoos and circuses (1968 ed., G. Sircom, Trans.). New York: Dover.
28.
Helmuth, L. (2003). Fear and trembling in the amygdala. Science, 300, 568-569.
29.
Herzog, T. R., & Chernick, K. K. (2000). Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 29-39.
30.
Herzog, T. R., & Kutzli, G. E. (2002). Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings. Environment & Behavior, 34(6), 819-835.
31.
Herzog, T. R., & Smith, G. A. (1988). Danger, mystery and environmental preference. Environment and Behavior, 20(3), 320-344.
32.
Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space (1990 ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Hinde, R. A. (1998). Humans and human habitats: Reciprocal influences. In B. Cartledge (Ed.), Mind, brain, and the environment (pp. 6-27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
Holden, C. (2000). The brain’s special places. Science, 287, 1587.
36.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment. New York: Praeger.
38.
Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M., & Sullivan, W. (1998). Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 28-59.
39.
Lazarus, J., & Symonds, M. (1992). Contrasting effects of protective and obstructive cover on avian vigilance. Animal Behavior, 43, 519-521.
40.
Lima, S. L. (1987). Distance to cover, visual obstructions, and vigilance in house sparrows. Behavior, 102, 231-238.
41.
Loewen, L. J., Steel, G. D., & Suedfeld, P. (1993). Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 323-331.
42.
Lorenz, K. (1952). King Solomon’s ring (M. K. Wilson, Trans.). New York: Crowell.
43.
Metcalfe, N. B. (1984). The effects of habitat on the vigilance of shorebirds: Is visibility important?Animal Behavior, 32, 981-985.
44.
Miller, R. D. (1994). Computing the area of a spherical polygon. In P. S. Heckbert (Ed.), Graphic gems IV (pp. 132-137). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45.
Nasar, J. L., & Fisher, B. S. (1993). “Hot spots” of fear and crime: A multi-method investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 187-206.
46.
Nasar, J. L., Fisher, B. S., & Grannis, M. (1993). Proximate physical cues to fear of crime. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 161-178.
47.
Nasar, J. L., & Jones, K. M. (1997). Landscapes of fear and stress. Environment and Behavior, 29(3), 291-323.
48.
Nasar, J. L., Julian, D., Buchman, S., Humphreys, D., & Mrohaly, M. (1983). The emotional quality of scenes and observation points: A look at prospect and refuge. Landscape Planning, 10, 355-361.
49.
Öhman, A. (1986). Face the beast and fear the face: Animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analysis of emotion. Psychophysiology, 23(2), 123-145.
50.
Peponis, J., & Wineman, J. (2002). Spatial structure of environment and behavior. In R. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 271-291). New York: John Wiley.
51.
Rodríguez, A., Andrén, H., & Jansson, G. (2001). Habitat-mediated predation risk and decision making of small birds at forest edges. OIKOS, 95, 383-396.
52.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
53.
Russell, P. A. (1979). Fear-evoking stimuli. In W. Sluckin (Ed.), Fear in animals and man (pp. 86-124). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
54.
Schroeder, H. W., & Anderson, L. M. (1984). Perception of personal safety in urban recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 16(2), 178-194.
55.
Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5(4), 195-200.
56.
Shaffer, G. S., & Anderson, L. M. (1983). Perceptions of the security and attractiveness of urban parking lots. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 311-323.
57.
Stamps, A. E. (1992). Bootstrap investigation of respondent sample size for environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 220-222.
58.
Stamps, A. E. (2000). Psychology and the aesthetics of the built environment. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
59.
Stamps, A. E. (2001). Evaluating enclosure in urban sites. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 25-42.
60.
Stamps, A. E. (2002). Meta analysis. In R. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), The handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 222-232). New York: John Wiley.
61.
Stamps, A. E. (2003a). Permeability and environmental enclosure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 1305-1310.
62.
Stamps, A. E. (2003b). Review of the studies on characteristics of isovists and their relations to subjective impressions of spaciousness or enclosure. Manuscript submitted for publication.
63.
Stamps, A. E. (2004). Environmental preference, coherence, legibility, complexity, and mystery: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 1-16.
64.
Stamps, A. E., & Smith, S. G. (2002). Environmental enclosure in urban areas. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 781-794.
65.
Thiel, P. (1997). People, paths, and purposes: Notations for a participatory envirotecture. Seattle: University of Washington.
66.
Thiel, P., Harrison, E. D., & Alden, R. S. (1986). The perception of spatial enclosure as a function of the position of architectural spaces. Environment and Behavior, 18(2), 227-245.
67.
Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001). From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural shape. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 103-121.
68.
von Uexküll, J. (1957). A stroll through the world of animals and men. In C. H. Schiller & K. S. Lashley (Eds.), Instinctive behavior (pp. 5-80). New York: International Universities Press.
69.
Warr, M. (1990). Dangerous situations: Social context and fear of victimization. Social Forces, 68(3), 891-907.
70.
Weiner, E. S., & Simpson, J. (Eds.). (1991). The compact Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
71.
Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
