Perceptions of Accident Foreseeability and Stress and Coping During the Evacuation Period of Technological Disaster

Abstract

The public depends on experts to manage risks of technologies and to prevent or warn of a possible mishap. Perceptions of experts’ ability to predict accidents were investigated in evacuees and controls during the threat of explosion from the derailment of a train carrying liquid propane. Evacuees showed elevated stress response levels compared to controls across psychological, behavioral, and physiological modalities. Perceptions of transportation accident foreseeability moderated physiological stress for evacuees, with stronger perceptions of accident predictability associated with lower stress hormone levels. Perceptions of transportation accident foreseeability also were associated with a reactance-style response to the disaster and problem-solving coping style in evacuees. Perceptions associated with greater secondary predictability moderated the physiological stress effects of the accident on evacuees during the acute phase of the disaster and furthermore, was associated with more efforts to regain control through more active coping.

Keywords

stress & coping technological disaster train derailment secondary predictability stress hormones

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baum, A. (1991). Toxins, technology, and natural disasters. In A. Monat & R. S. Lazarus (Eds.), Stress & coping: An anthology (3rd ed., pp. 97-139). New York: Columbia University Press.

Baum, A. , Fleming, R. , & Davidson, L. M. (1983). Natural disaster and technological catastrophe. Environment and Behavior, 15, 333-354.

Baum, A. , Fleming, R. , & Reddy, D. M. (1986). Unemployment stress: Loss of control, reactance and learned helplessness. Social Science and Medicine, 22, 509-516.

Baum, A. , Fleming, R. , & Singer, J. E. (1983). Coping with victimization by technological disaster. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 117-138.

Baum, A. , & Gatchel, R. J. (1981). Cognitive determinants of reaction to uncontrollable events: Development of reactance and learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1078-1089.

Baum, A. , & Grunberg, N. (1997). Measurement of stress hormones. In S. Cohen , R. C. Kessler , & L. U. Gordon (Eds.), Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 175-192). New York: Oxford University Press.

Bowler, R. M. , Mergler, D. , Huel, G. , & Cone, J. E. (1994). Psychological, psychosocial, and psychophysiological sequelae in a community affected by a railroad chemical disaster. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 601-623.

Brown, R. S. , Williams, C. W. , & Lees-Haley, P. R. (1994). The effects of hindsight bias and causal attribution on human response to environmental events. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(8), 661-674.

Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research.

10.

Derogatis, L. R. (1983). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual–II. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research.

11.

Evans, G. W. , Wener, R. E. , & Phillips, D. (2002). The morning rush hour: Predictability and commuter stress. Environment & Behavior, 34, 521-530.

12.

Folkman, S. , & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170.

13.

Folkman, S. , Lazarus, R. S. , Dunkel-Schetter, C. , DeLongis, A. , & Gruen, R. (1986). The dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992-1003.

14.

Frankenhaeuser, M. (1975). Experimental approaches to the study of catecholamines and emotion. In L. Levi (Ed.), Emotions—Their parameters and measurement (pp. 209-234). New York: Raven.

15.

Glass, D. , & Singer, J. (1972). Behavioral aftereffects of unpredictable and uncontrollable aversive events. American Scientist, 60, 457-465.

16.

Gleser, G. , Green, B. , & Winget, C. (1981). Prolonged psychosocial effects of disaster: A study of Buffalo Creek. New York: Academic Press.

17.

Grunberg, N. , & Singer, J. (1990). Biochemical measurement. In J. Cacioppo & L. Tassinary (Eds.), Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements (pp. 149-176). New York: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Herman, J. L. (1942). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.

19.

Kasperson, R. E. , Golding, D. , & Tuler, S. (1992). Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 161-187.

20.

Lazarus, R. , & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.

21.

Lundin, T. (1995). Transportation disasters—A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 381-389.

22.

Sedek, G. , & Kofta, M. (1990). When cognitive exertion does not yield cognitive gain: Toward an informational explanation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 729-743.

23.

Weiner, B. (1993). On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48, 957-965.

24.

Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility; A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.

25.

Wortman, C. B. , & Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness mode. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental and social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 277-336). New York: Academic Press.