How do people cope with global environmental problems? This article reports on the development and initial validation of a set of scales that measure coping with global environmental problems (e.g., climate change). Lazarus' coping approach formed the theoretical basis for the development of the scales. Altogether, eight scales were developed: problem solving, expressive coping, denial of guilt, relativization, wishful thinking, self-protection, pleasure, and resignation. In three studies ( N = 265; 275; 225) the scales and the scale structure were replicated (Cronbach's α: .63 to .90). A two-dimensional metastructure of the scales was supported by the data (problem-focused coping vs. deproblematization-focused coping). Furthermore, correlations (coping with stress and proenvironmental behavior) and hypothesized group differences in coping found empirical support. Thus, the scales can be used for research projects as well as for the preparation and evaluation of interventions to alleviate environmental stress and to foster proenvironmental behavior.
Baum, A., Fleming, R., & Singer, J.E. (1983). Coping with victimization by technological disaster . Journal of Social Issues, 39, 117-138.
2.
Beehr, T.A., & McGrath, J.E. (1996). The methodology of research on coping: Conceptual, strategic, and operational-level issues. In N. S. Endler & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 65-82). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
Bell, A.P., Greene, T.C., Fisher, J.D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental psychology (5th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.
4.
Benson, J., & Hagtvet, K.A. (1996). The interplay among design, data analysis, and theory in the measurement of coping. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 83-106). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
Bentler, P.M., & Yuan, K.H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 181-197.
6.
Böhm, A. (1989). Der Unfall von Tschernobyl, Umweltbelastungen und Atomkriegsdrohungen- Wie leben die Berliner damit? [ The incident in Tschernobyl, environmental pollution, and nuclear war threatening—How do people from Berlin deal with this?] Verhaltenstherapie und psychosozialePraxis, 20, 157-169.
7.
Brandtstädter, J. (1989). Personal self-regulation and development: Cross-sequential analyses of development-related control beliefs and emotions. Developmental Psychology, 25, 96-108.
8.
Byrne, B. (1994). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows . Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
9.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin,112(1), 155-159.
10.
Coyne, J.C., & Racioppo, M.W. (2000). Never the twain shall meet? Closing the gap between coping research and clinical intervention research. American-Psychologist, 55(6), 655-664.
Dunlap, R.E., Gallup, G.H., Jr., & Gallup, A.M. (1993). Health of the planet. A George H. Gallup Memorial Survey. Results of a 1992 International Environmental Opinion Survey of Citizens in 24 Nations. Princeton, NJ: George H. Gallup International Institute.
13.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170.
14.
Fuhrer, U., & Wölfing, S. (1997). Von den sozialen Grundlagen des Umweltbewußtseins zum verantwortlichen Umwelthandeln. Die sozialpsychologische Dimension globaler Umweltproblematik [From the social basis of environmental concern to responsible ecological action: The social-psychological dimension of environmental problems]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
15.
Gardner, G.T., & Stern, P.C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
16.
Geller, E.S. (2002). The challenge of increasing pro-environmental behavior. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 525-540). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17.
Greve, W., & Strobl, R. (2004). Social and individual coping with threats: Outlines of an interdisciplinary approach. Review of GeneralPsychology , 8, 194-207.
18.
Homburg, A. (1995). Subjektive Vorstellungen zur Umweltkrise. Eine empirische Studie zum Umweltbewusstsein [Subjective theories concerning environmental crisis]. Berichte des Forschungszentrums Jülich, 3153 (Dissertation RWTH Aachen) . Jülich, Germany: Forschungszentrum Jülich.
19.
Homburg, A. & Matthies, E. (1998). Umweltpsychologie: Umweltkrise, Gesellschaft und Individuum [Environmental psychology: Environmental crisis, society, and individual] . München: Juventa.
20.
Homburg, A., & Stolberg, A. (2004). Entwicklung und erste Validierung der Skalen zur Erfassung von Bewältigungsversuchen im Zusammenhang mit dem Umweltstressor “Schadstoffbelastungen” [Measurement scales of coping with the environmental stressor “pollution”—development and validation]. Zeitschrift für Diagnostische und DifferentiellePsychologie, 4, 199-211.
21.
Homburg, A., & Stolberg, A. (2006). Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 1-14.
22.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criterion for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
23.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( 2001). Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Retrieved January 17, 2003, from http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/reports.htms
24.
Iwata, O. (2002). Coping style and three psychological measures associated with environmentally responsible behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 661-670.
25.
Janke, W., Erdmann, G., & Kallus, W. (1985). Streßverarbeitungsfragebogen (SVF) [Coping questionare] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
26.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8. Structural equation modeling with the SIM-PLIS Command Language [Computer software]. Chicago : Scientific Software International, Inc.
27.
Kannapin, O., Pawlik, K., & Zinn, F.( 1998). Prädiktormuster selbstberichteten Umweltverhaltens [The pattern of variables predicting self-reported environmental behavior]. Zeitschrift für ExperimentellePsychologie, 45(4), 365-377.
28.
Karger, C.R., & Wiedemann, P.M. (1994). Wahrnehmung von Umweltproblemen [Perception of environmental problems]. Natur und Landschaft , 69, 3-8.
29.
Krämer, M. (1991). Problembewältigung und Kontrollüberzeugungen. Bereichsübergreifende und bereichsspezifische Analysen unter Berücksichtigung der Themen Energie und Umwelt, Frieden und Rüstung sowie Arbeitslosigkeit [Problem solving and control-beliefs]. Regensburg, Germany: Roderer.
30.
Krohne, H.W. (1989). The concept of coping modes: Relating cognitive person variables to actual coping behavior. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 11(4), 235-248.
31.
Kuckartz, U., & Rheingans-Heintze, A. (2004). Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2004. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage [Environmental awareness in Germany 2004. Results of the representative population survey] . Berlin: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit.
Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Emotion and adaption. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
34.
Lazarus, R.S. (1998). Coping from the perspective of personality. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 19, 213-233.
35.
Lepore, S., & Evans. G. (1996). Coping with multiple stressors in the environment . In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 350-377). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
36.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search for the golden rules: comments on hypothesis-testing approach to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and danger in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling , 11, 320-341.
37.
Martens, T., & Rost, J. (1998). Der Zusammenhang von wahrgenommener Bedrohung durch Umweltgefahren und der Ausbildung von Handlungsintentionen [Relationship between the perceived threat of environmental problems and the formation of action intentions]. Zeitschrift für ExperimentellePsychologie , 45, 345-364.
38.
Moos, R.H. (1988). Coping: Konzepte und Meßverfahren [Coping concepts and mesuring methods]. Zeitschrift für psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse, 34(4), 207-225.
39.
Oskamp, S. (2002). Environmentally responsible behavior: Teaching and promoting it effectively. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 1, 173-182.
40.
Preston, C.C., & Colman, A.M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity discriminating power, and respondent preferences . Acta Psychologica, 104, 1-15.
41.
Ruff, F.M. (1990). Ökologische Krise und Risikobewußtsein. Zur psychologischen Verarbeitung von Umweltbelastung [Environmental crisis and risk-consciousness: Psychological handling of environmental pollution]. Wiesbaden , Germany: DVU.
42.
Salewski, C. (1997). Formen der Krankheitsverarbeitung [Models of coping with affliction]. In C. Tesch-Römer, C. Salewski, & G. Schwarz (Eds.), Psychologie der Bewältigung [Psychology of coping] (pp. 42-57). Weinheim, Germany: PVU.
43.
Schahn, J., Damian, M., Schurig, U., & Füchsle, C. (2000). Konstruktion und Evaluation der dritten Version des Skalensystems zur Erfassung des Umweltbewusstseins (SEU-3) [Construction and evaluation of the third version of scale system for assessing environmental awareness (SEU-3)]. Diagnostica, 6, 84-92.
44.
Schwarzer, R., & Schwarzer, C. (1996). A critical survey of coping instruments. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 107-132). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
45.
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G.A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Research in HumanEcology, 6, 81-97.
46.
Tanner, C., & Foppa, K. (1996). Umweltwahrnehmung, Umweltbewußtsein und Umweltverhalten [Environmental perception, environmental awareness, pro-environmental behaviour] . In A. Diekmann & C. Jäger (Eds.), Umweltsoziologie. Sonderband 36/1996 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (245-271). Opladen, Germany, Westdeutscher Verlag.
47.
Tobin, D.L., Holroyd, K.A., Reynolds, R.V., & Wigal, J.K. (1989). The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13, 343-361.
48.
Ulich, D., Haußner, K., Mayring, P., Strehmel, P., Kandler, M., & Degenhardt, B. (1985). Psychologie der Krisenbewältigung [Psychology of coping in crises]. Weinheim und Basel, Germany: Beltz.
49.
Ullman, J.B. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (pp.653-771). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
50.
United Nations Environment Programme (2002 ). Synthesis Global Environment Outlook 3. Retrieved May 19, 2004, from http://www.grida.no/geo/geo3/english/pdfs/synthesis.pdf
51.
Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-69.
52.
Weber, H. (1997). Emotionsbewältigung [Emotional-coping]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
53.
Wentura, D., Greve, W., & Klauer, T. (2002). Theorien der Bewältigung. [Theories of coping.] In D. Frey & M. Irle (Eds.), Theorien der Sozialpsychologie, Band III [Theories in social psychology, Vol. 3; pp. 101-125). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
54.
Zeidner, M. & Endler, N.-S. (Eds.) (1996). Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
55.
Zelezny, L. & Schultz. P.W. (2000). Promoting environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 365-271.
