Three experiments investigated the route-angularity effect, which is demonstrated when a greater number of turns along a route increases the estimated length. So far, a route-angularity effect has not been demonstrated in school-age children. Because of the lack of a developmental theory, this finding could only be explained by a minor control of environmental features or by the experimental design. The experiments were conducted in a controlled virtual environment. In the first experiment, 11-year-old children explored two routes of equal length, which differed in the number of turns. Each child explored only one of the two routes in the second experiment. Only the first experiment demonstrated an influence in the number of turns on distance estimation. This result was confirmed in the last experiment with adults. If participants had no possibility to compare the routes in respect to their number of turns, both routes were estimated as equally long.
Albert, W. S., Rensink, R. A., & Beusmanns, J. (1999). Learning relative directions between landmarks in a desk top virtual environment. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 131-144.
2.
Allen, G. L. (1981). A developmental perspective on the effects of “subdividing” macrospatial experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 120-132.
3.
Allen, G. L., & Kirasic, K. C. (1985). Effects of the cognitive organization of route knowledge on judgements of macrospatial distance. Memory & Cognition, 13, 218-227.
4.
Berendt, B. (1999). Representation and processing of knowledge about distances in environmental spaces: A computational model of inferred route distances investigating their qualitative and quantitative determinants. Bonn, Germany: Infix.
5.
Block, R. (1992). Prospective and retrospective duration judgement: The role of information processing and memory. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. Friedman (Eds.), Time, action and cognition (pp. 141-152). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
6.
Chabanne, V., Péruch, P., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2003). Virtual to real transfer of spatial learning in a complex environment: The role of path network and additional features. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, 43-59.
7.
Cohen, R., Weatherford, D., & Byrd, D. (1980). Distance estimates of children as a function of acquisition and response activities. Journalof Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 464-472.
8.
Cohen, R., Weatherford, D. L., Lomenick, T., & Koeller, K. (1979). Development of spatial representations: The role of task demands and familiarity with the environment. Child Development, 50, 1257-1260.
9.
Cohen, S., & Cohen, R. (1982). Distance estimates of children as a function of type of activity in the environment. Child Development, 53, 834-837.
10.
Darken, R. P., & Silbert, J. L. (1996). Navigating large virtual spaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 49-71.
11.
Foreman, N., Stanton, D., Wilson, P., & Duffy, H. (2003). Spatial knowledge of a real school environment acquired from virtual or physical models by able-bodied children and children with physical disabilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 67-74.
12.
Gillner, S., & Mallot, H. (1998). Navigation and acquisition of spatial knowledge in a virtual maze. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 445-463.
13.
Goldin, S. E., & Thorndyke, P. W. (1982). Simulating navigation for spatial knowledge acquisition. Human Factors, 24, 457-471.
14.
Heft, H. (1988). The vicissitudes of ecological phenomena in environment-behavior research. On the failure to replicate the “angularity effect”. Environment and Behavior, 20, 92-99.
15.
Herman, J. F., Kolker, R. G., & Shaw, M. L. (1982). Effects of motor activity on children’s intentional and incidental memory for spatial locations. Child Development, 53, 239-244.
16.
Herman, J. F., Norton, L. M., & Klein, C. A. (1986). Children’s distance estimates in a large-scale environment: A search for the route-angularity effect. Environment and Behavior, 18, 533-558.
17.
Herman, J. F., Norton, L. M., & Roth, S. F. (1983). Children’s distance estimates in a large-scale environment: Effects of time and clutter. Journalof Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 453-470.
18.
Herman, J. F., & Siegel, A. W. (1978). The development of cognitive mapping of the large-scale environment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26, 389-406.
19.
Jansen-Osmann, P. (2002). Using desktop virtual environments to investigate the role of landmarks. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 427-436.
20.
Jansen-Osmann, P., & Berendt, B. (2002). Investigating distance knowledge using virtual environments. Environment and Behavior, 34, 178-193.
21.
Kahl, H. B., Herman, J. F., & Klein, C. A. (1984). Distance distortions in children’s cognitive maps: An examination of the information storage model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 134-146.
22.
Kosslyn, S. M., Pick, H. L., & Fariello, G. R. (1974). Cognitive maps in children and men. Child Development, 45, 707-716.
23.
Kozak, J. J., Hancock, P. A., Arthur, E. J., & Chrysler, S. T. (1993). Transfer of training from virtual reality. Ergonomics, 36, 777-784.
24.
McNamara, T. P., & Diwadkar, V. A. (1997). Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 160-190.
25.
Milgram, S. (1973). Introduction. In W. H. Ittelson (Ed.), Environment and cognition (pp. 21-27). New York: Seminary.
26.
Montello, D. R. (1997). The perception and cognition of environmental distance: Direct sources of information. In S. C. Hirtle & A. U. Frank (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 297-311). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
27.
Newcombe, N., & Liben, L. S. (1982). Barrier effects in the cognitive maps of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 46-58.
28.
Péruch, P., Belingrad, L., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2000). Transfer of spatial knowledge from virtual to real environments. In C. Freksa, W. Bauer, C. Habel, & K. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition II, LNAI 1849 (pp. 253-264). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
29.
Plumert, J. M., & Hund, A. M. (2001). The development of memory for location: What role do spatial prototypes play?Child Development, 72, 370-384.
30.
Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27, 741-750.
31.
Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. (1997). Navigating buildings in “desk-top” virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 143-159.
32.
Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D.M. (1999). The effect of maps on navigation and search strategies in very-large-scale virtual environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 54-75.
33.
Sadalla, E. K., & Magel, S. G. (1980). The perception of traversed distance. Environment and Behavior, 12, 65-79.
34.
Sadalla, E. K., & Staplin, L. J. (1980a). An information storage model for distance cognition. Environment and Behavior, 12, 183-193.
35.
Sadalla, E. K., & Staplin, L. (1980b). The perception of traversed distance: Intersections. Environment & Behavior, 12, 167-182.
36.
Sadalla, E. K., Staplin, L. J., & Burroughs, W. J. (1979). Retrieval processes in distance cognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 291-296.
37.
Thiel, P. (1970). Notes on the description, scaling, notion, and scoring of some perceptual and cognitive attributes of the physical environment. In H. M. Prohansky, W. H. Ittelson, & L. G. Rivalin (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting (pp. 593-619). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
38.
Thorndyke, P. W. (1981). Distance estimation from cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 526-550.
39.
Waller, D. (2000). Individual differences in spatial learning from computer-simulated environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 307-321.
40.
Waller, D., Knapp, D., & Hunt, E. (2001). Spatial representations of virtual mazes: The role of visual fidelity and individual differences. Human Factors, 43, 147-158.
41.
Westerman, S. J., Cribbin, T., & Wilson, R. (2001). Virtual information space navigation: Evaluating the use of head tracking. Behaviour and Information Technology, 20, 419-426.
42.
Wiest, W., & Bell, B. (1985). Stevens’s exponent for psychophysical scaling of perceived, remembered and inferred distance. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 457-479.
43.
Willemsen, P., & Gooch, A. A. (2002). Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments. Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality (VR ’02), 275-276.
44.
Witmer, B. G., Bailey, J. H., Knerr, B. W., & Parsons, K. C. (1996). Virtual spaces and real world places: Transfer of route knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 413-128.
45.
Witmer, B. G., & Kline, P. B. (1998). Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 7, 144-167.
46.
Witmer, B. G., & Sadowski, W. J. (1998). Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors, 40, 478-488.
47.
Zakay, D. (1989). Subjective time and attentional resources allocation: An integrated model of time estimation. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective (pp. 365-397). New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
48.
Zakay, D., Tsal, Y., Moses, M., & Shahar, I. (1994). The role of segmentation in prospective and retrospective time estimation processes. Memory and Cognition, 22, 344-351.
