In the past, researchers in the field of environmental psychology have explained environmental perceptions primarily through socioeconomic and demographic factors. However, knowledge of and support for protecting specific natural features of the landscape should also be influenced by one’s location, setting, and proximity to such features. This article focuses on residents’familiarity with and concern for two creeks passing through San Antonio, TX. Using Geographic Information Systems analytical techniques, we expand on previous studies by introducing driving distance from the creeks to identify the effects of this location-based variable on environmental perceptions. Specifically, we test the degree to which the actual driving distance respondents live from two creeks affects respondents’ knowledge and perceptions of the water bodies. We show that when controlling for socioeconomic and geographic contextual variables, the residential distance variable remains a significant factor in explaining both familiarity with the creeks and views on the level of water pollution in them. Based on the results, we discuss the implications of incorporating proximity factors in watershed planning and policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alm, L. R., & Witt, S. L. (1994). Environmental policy in the Intermountain West: The ruralurban linkage. Paper presented at the annual meeting of theWestern Political Science Association, Albuquerque, NM.
2.
Brown, G. G., Harris, C. C., & Reed, P. (2002). Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: An Alaska case study. Applied Geography,22(1), 49-76.
3.
Bush, J., Moffatt, S., & Dunn, C. E. (2001). Keeping the public informed? Public negotiation of air quality information. Public Understanding of Science, 10, 213-229.
4.
Buttell, F. H. (1987).New directions in environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 465-488.
5.
Cantrill, J. G. (1998). The environmental self and a sense of place: Communication foundations for regional ecosystem management. Journal of Applied Communications Research, 26(3), 301-318.
6.
Cantrill, J. G., & Senecah, S. L. (2001). Using the “sense of place” construct in the context of environmental policy-making and landscape planning. Environmental Science and Policy, (4), 185-203.
7.
Cornell Local Government Program. (1998). Long Islanders and the environment of the South Shore: A survey of public opinion. South Shore Estuary Reserve Technical Report Series.
8.
Coughlin, R. E. (1976). The perception and valuation of water quality: A review of research method and findings. In K. H. Craik & E. H. Zube (Eds.), Perceiving environmental quality (pp. 205-227). New York: Plenum Press.
9.
Duffala, D. C. (1976).Convenience stores, armed robbery, and physical environment features. American Behaviorial Scientist, 20, 227-246.
10.
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978).The “new environmental paradigm”: A proposed instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
11.
Elliot, S. J., Cole, D. C., Kreuger, P., Voorberg, N.,& Wakefield, S. (1999).The power of perception: Health risk attributed to air pollution in an urban industrial neighborhood. Risk Analysis, 19, 621-634.
12.
Farley, J. E., & Hansel, M. (1981).The ecological context of urban crime: Further exploration. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 17, 37-54.
13.
Foster, R. H., & McBeth, M. K. (1994). Urban-rural influences in U.S. environmental and economic development policy. Journal of Rural Studies, 12(4), 387-397.
14.
Fortmann, L.,& Kusel, J. (1990). New voices, old beliefs: Forest environmentalism among new and long-standing rural residents. Rural sociology, 55(2), 214-232.
15.
Fransson, N., & Garling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, meausrements, methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369-382.
16.
Freudenburg, W. R. (1991).Rural-urban differences in environmental concern: A closer look. Sociological Inquiry, 61, 167-198.
17.
Gawande, K.,& Jenkins-Smith, H. (2001).Nuclearwaste transport and residential property values: Estimating the effects of perceived risks. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42, 207-233.
18.
Gilbert, F. F. (1982).Public attitudes toward urban wildlife: A pilot study in Guelph, Ontario. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 10, 245-253.
19.
Gobster, P. H. (1995).Preception and use of a metropolitan greenway system for recreation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33, 401-413.
20.
Gobster, P. H. (1998). Nearby neighborhood resident’s images and perceptions of the river. In P. H. Gobster& L. M. Westphal (Eds.), People and the river: Perception and use of Chicago waterways for recreation(pp. 5-48). Milwaukee, WI: U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program.
21.
Gobster, P. H. (2002).Managing urban parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele. Leisure Sciences, 24, 143-159.
22.
Guagano, G. A., & Markee, N. (1995). Regional differences in the sociodemographic determinants of environmental concern. Population and Environment, 17(2), 135-149.
23.
Hannon, B. (1994).Sense of place: Geographic discounting by people, animals and plants. Ecological Economics, 10, 157-174.
24.
Hannon, B., & Norton, B. G. (1997).Environmental values: A place-based theory. Environmental Ethics, 19, 227-245.
25.
Hawley, A. (1944). Ecology and human ecology. Social Forces, 22(4), 398-405.
26.
Honnold, J. A. (1981). Predictors of public environmental concerns in the 1970s. In E. D. Mann (Ed.), Environmental policy formation(pp. 63-75). Lexington, MA: Heath.
27.
Howell, S. E., & Laska, S. B. (1992).The changing face of the environmental coalition: A research note. Environment and Behavior, 24, 134-144.
28.
Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992).The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? Rural Sociology, 57(1), 28-47.
29.
Lind, A. W. (1930). Some ecological patterns of community disorganization in Honolulu. American Journal of Sociology, 36, 206-220.
30.
Longmoor, E. S., & Young, E. F. (1936). Ecological interrelationships of juvenile delinquency, dependency, and population mobility. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 598-610.
31.
Lowe, G. D., & Pinhey, T. K. (1982). Rural-urban differences in support for environmental protection. Rural Sociology, 47(1), 114-128.
32.
McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The ecological approach to the study of the human community. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The City. Chicago: Chicago Press.
33.
Mitchell, R. C. (1979). Silent spring/solid majorities. Public Opinion, 55, 1-20.
34.
Morrison, D. E. (1986). How and why environmental consciousness has trickled down. In A. Schnaiberg, N. Watts, & K. Zimmerman (Eds.), Distributional conflicts in environmentalresource policy(pp. 187-220). New York: St. Martin’s.
35.
Nord, M., Luloff, A. E., & Bridger, J. C. (1998). The association of forest recreation with environmentalism. Environment and Behavior, 30, 235-246.
36.
Queen, S. A. (1940). The ecological study of mental disorders. American Sociological Review, 5, 201-210.
37.
Raudsepp, M. (2001). Some socio-demographic and socio-psychological predictors of environmentalism. Trames, 5(55/50), 3, 355-367.
38.
Samdahl, D. M.,& Robertson, R. (1989). Social determinants of environmental concern: Specification and test of the model. Environment and Behavior, 22, 57-81.
39.
Scott, D., & Willets, F. K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 26(2), 239-261.
40.
Steele, F. (1981). The sense of place. Boston: CBI Publishing.
41.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. (1996, 1998, 1999, 2000). State of Texas List of Impaired Water Bodies, Section 303(d). Austin, TX: Author.
42.
Tremblay, K. R.,& Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Rural residence and concern for environmental quality: A replication and extension. Rural Sociology, 43, 474-491.
43.
Van Liere, K. D.,& Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: Areviewof hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 181-197.
44.
Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1981). Environmental concern—Does it make a difference how it’s measured? Environment and Behavior, 13, 651-676.
45.
Williams, D. R. (1995). Mapping place meanings for ecosystem management. Unpublished Technical Report, USDA Forest Service.
46.
Zube, E., Simcox, D., & Friedman, S. (1998). Desert riparian landscapes: Values and change. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42, 81-89.
