A two-stage model of littering behavior in public places differentiated two types of littering: active and passive. The distinction between active littering (e.g., someone drops litter on the ground and continues walking) and passive littering (e.g., someone drops litter on a bench while seated and fails to remove it when leaving) depends on the latency between (a) when the litter is placed in the environment and (b) failure to remove that litter when vacating the territory. Results suggested passive littering was more resistant to change than active littering. Posted feedback significantly reduced cigarette littering by 17% (20% reduction in active littering, 6% increase in passive littering) and noncigarette littering by 19% (0% change in active littering due to minimal baseline levels, 25% reduction in passive littering). The probability of littering also increased with the latency between when litter was placed in the area and when the individual vacated the area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
2.
Bacon-Prue, A., Blount, R., Pickering, D., & Drabman, R. S. (1980). An evaluation of three litter control procedures—Trash receptacles, paid workers, and the marked item technique. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 165-170.
3.
Burgess, R. L., Clark, R. N., & Hendee, J. C. (1971). An experimental analysis of anti-litter procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 71-75.
4.
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
5.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
6.
Cope, J. G., Huffman, K. T., Allred, L. J., & Grossnickle, W. F. (1993). Behavioral strategies to reduce cigarette litter. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 607-619.
7.
Dixon, R. S., Knott, T., Rowsell, H., Sheldon, L., & Moore, D. (1992). Prompts and posted feedback: In search of an effective method of litter control. Behavior Change, 9, 2-7.
8.
Dixon, R. S., & Moore, D. W. (1992). The effects of posted feedback on littering: Another look. Behavior Change, 9, 83-86.
9.
Durdan, C. A., Reeder, G. D., & Hecht, P. R. (1985). Litter in a university cafeteria: Demographic data and the use of prompts as an intervention strategy. Environment and Behavior, 17, 387-404.
10.
Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Cobern, M. K., Porter, B. E., & Jackson, J. M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980. Environment and Behavior, 25, 275-321.
11.
Finnie, W. C. (1973). Field experiments in litter control. Environment and Behavior, 5, 123-144.
12.
Geller, E. S. (1975). Increasing desired waste disposals with instructions. Man-Environment Systems, 5, 125-128.
13.
Geller, E. S. (1992). Solving environmental problems: A behavior change perspective. In S. Staub & P. Green (Eds.), Psychology and social responsibility: Facing global challenges (pp. 248-268). New York: New York University Press.
14.
Geller, E. S., Brasted, W., & Mann, M. (1980). Waste receptacle designs as interventions for litter control. Journal of Environmental Systems, 9, 145-160.
15.
Geller, E. S., Winett, R., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
16.
Geller, E. S., Witmer, J. F., & Orebaugh, A. L. (1976). Instructions as a determinant of paper-disposal behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 8, 417-439.
17.
Geller, E. S., Witmer, J. F., & Tuso, M. E. (1977). Environmental interventions for litter control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 344-351.
18.
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences of attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699-718.
19.
Houghton, S. (1993). Using verbal and visual prompts to control littering in high schools. Educational Studies, 19, 247-254.
20.
Huffman, K. T., Grossnickle, W. F., Cope, J. G., & Huffman, K. P. (1995). Litter reduction: A review and integration of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 27, 153-183.
21.
Hutton, K. A., Sibley, C. G., Harper, D. N., & Hunt, M. (2002). Modifying driver behavior with passenger feedback. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 4, 257-269.
22.
Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002-1012.
23.
Katzev, R., & Mishima, H. R. (1992). The use of posted feedback to promote recycling. Psychological Reports, 71, 259-264.
24.
Meeker, F. L. (1997). A comparison of table-littering behavior in two settings: A case for a contextual research strategy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 59-68.
25.
Reams, M. A., Geaghan, J. P., & Gendron, R. C. (1996). The link between recycling and litter: A field study. Environment & Behavior, 28, 92-110.
26.
Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kallgren, C. A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104-112.
27.
Oliver, S. S., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1985). Education to reduce impacts on forest camp grounds. Journal of Forestry, 83, 234-236.
28.
O'Neill, G. W., Blanck, L. S., & Joyner, M. A. (1980). The use of stimulus control over littering in a natural setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 379-381.
29.
Woodward, J., Bonnett, D., & Brecht, M. (1990). Introduction to linear models and experimental design. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
