Measures of proenvironmental behavior in psychological studies do not always reflect the actual environmental impact of a person or household. Therefore, the results of these studies provide little insight into variables that could be helpful in reducing household environmental impact. In this article, an environmentally significant measure of household consumer behavior (i.e., combined direct and indirect energy use) is presented and compared with a common social science measure of proenvironmental behavior (based on popular notions of environmentally significant behavior). Two large-scale field studies were conducted among representative samples of Dutch households. The results showed respondents who indicate they behave more proenvironmentally do not necessarily use less energy. Also, proenvironmental behavior is more strongly related to attitudinal variables, whereas household energy use is primarily related to variables such as income and household size. More multidisciplinary research seems necessary to identify variables that influence the actual environmental impact of household consumer behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baird, J. C. , & Brier, J. M. (1981). Perceptual awareness of energy requirements of familiar objects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 90-96.
2.
Berger, I. E. (1997). The demographics of recycling and the structure of environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 29, 515-531.
3.
Black, J. S. , Stern, P. C., & Elworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 3-21.
4.
Cameron, L. D. , Brown, P. M., & Chapman, J. G. (1998). Social value orientations and decision to take pro-environmental action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 675-697.
5.
Central Bureau for Statistics . (1995). Statistisch jaarboek 1995 [Statistical yearbook 1995]. The Hague, the Netherlands: SDU Uitgeverij.
6.
Central Bureau for Statistics . (1996). Statistisch jaarboek 1996 [Statistical yearbook 1996]. The Hague, the Netherlands: SDU Uitgeverij.
7.
Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied MCR analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Dietz, T. , Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450-471.
9.
Dürr, H. P. (1994). Sustainable, equitable economics. The personal energy budget. In P. B. Smith, S. E. Okoye, J. De Wilde, & P. Deshingkar (Eds.), The world at the crossroads: Towards a sustainable, equitable and liveable world (pp. 39-57). London: Earthscan.
10.
Ester, P. (1984). Consumer behavior and energy conservation. A policy-oriented field experimental study on the effectiveness of behavioral interventions promoting residential energy conservation (Doctoral dissertation). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus University.
11.
Fuijii, E. T. , Hennesy, M., & Mak, J. (1985). An evaluation of the validity and reliability of survey response data on household electricity conservation. Evaluation Review, 9, 93-104.
12.
Gatersleben, B.C.M. (2000). Sustainable household metabolism and quality of life: Examining the perceived social sustainability of environmentally sustainable household consumption patterns (Doctoral dissertation). Groningen, the Netherlands: University of Groningen.
13.
Gatersleben, B.C.M. (2001). Sustainable household consumption and quality of life: The acceptability of sustainable consumption patterns and consumer policy strategies. International Journal of Environmental Pollution, 15, 200-216.
14.
Gatersleben, B.C.M. , & Vlek, Ch. (1997). Understanding household metabolism in view of environmental quality and sustainable development. In G. Antonides, W. Van Raaij, & S. Maital (Eds), Advances in economic psychology (pp 145-168). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15.
Gatersleben, B. , & Vlek, Ch. (1998). Household consumption, quality-of-life and environmental impacts: A psychological perspective and empirical study. In K. J. Noorman & A.J.M. Schoot Uiterkamp (Eds.), Green households? Domestic consumers environment and sustainability (pp. 141-179). London: Earthscan.
16.
Grunert, S. C. , & Juhl, H. J. (1995). Values, environmental attitudes and buying of organic foods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 39-62.
17.
Guagnano, G. A. , Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude behaviour relationships, a natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699-718.
18.
Harland, P. , & Staats, H. J. (1995). Het Ecoteam programma in Nederland (deelrapport 4) [The Ecoteam program in the Netherlands (Report No. E&M/R-97/67)]. Leiden: Energy and Environmental Research, University of Leiden, the Netherlands.
19.
Harland, P. , & Staats, H. J. (1997). Effecten can het Ecoteam prgramma op langere termijn: de situatie 2 jaar na deelname [Long-term effects of the Ecoteam Program: The situation 2 years after participation (Report No. E&M/R-97/67)]. Leiden: Energy and Environmental Research, University of Leiden, the Netherlands.
20.
Harland, P. , Staats, H., & Wilke, H.A.M (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2505-2528.
21.
Heberlein, T. A. , & Warriner, G. K. (1983). The influence of price and attitudes on shifting residential electricity consumption from on to off-peak periods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4, 107-130.
22.
Kaiser, F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395-422.
23.
Kaiser, F. G. , Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1-19.
24.
Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111-133.
25.
Katzev, R. D. , & Johnson, T. R. (1984). Comparing the effects of monitoring incentives and food-in-the-door strategies in promoting residential electricity conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 12-27.
26.
Kramer, K. J. , Wiersma, G., Gatersleben, B.C.M., Noorman, K. J., & Biesiot, W. (1998). Huishoudelijke energiegebruik gemeten: Aard, omvang en veranderingspotentieel [Measuring household energy use: Nature, volume and change potential (IVEM Report No. 93)]. Groningen, the Netherlands: University of Groningen, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies.
27.
McKenzie-Mohr, D. , Nemiroff, L. S., Beers, L., & Desmarais, S. (1995). Determinants of responsible environmental behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 139-156.
28.
Noorman, K. J. , & Schoot Uiterkamp, A.J.M. (Eds.). (1998). Green households? Domestic consumers environment and sustainability. London: Earthscan.
29.
Ölander, F. , & Thøgerson, J. (1995). Understanding consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18, 345-385.
30.
Olson, M. E. (1981). Consumers attitudes toward energy conservation. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 108-131.
31.
Painter, J. , Semenik, R., & Belk, R. (1983). Is there a generalized energy conservation ethic? A comparison of the determinants of gasoline and home-heating energy conservation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3, 317-331.
32.
Pelletier, L. G. , Tuson, K. M., Green-Demers, I., Noels, K., & Beaton, A. M. (1998). Why are you doing this for the environment? The motivation toward the environment scale (MTES). Environment and Behavior, 28, 437-468.
33.
Poortinga, W. , Wiersma, G., Steg, L., Vlek, C., Noorman, K. J., Moll, H., & Schoot Uiterkamp, T. (2000). Quality-of-life impacts of experimental scenarios for sustainable household energy use. Groningen: University of Groningen, Centre for Environmental and Traffic Psychology/IVEM.
34.
Porter, B. E. , Leeming, F. C., & Dwyer, W. O. (1995). Solid waste recovery: A review of behavioral programmes to increase recycling behaviour. Environment and Behaviour, 27, 122-152.
35.
Schneider, H. C. (1994). Op zoek naar energie-extensieve leefstijlen: bestedingspatronen en energiebeslag van Nederlandse huishoudens [In search of energy-extensive lifestyles: Expenditure patterns and energy use of Dutch households (CEA Report No. 9346)]. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Bureau voor Communicatie en Advies over Energie en Milieu.
36.
Schultz, W. P. , & Oskamp, S. (1996). Effort as a moderator of the attitude-behaviour relationship: General environmental concern and recycling. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 375-383.
37.
Steg, L. (1999). Verspilde energie? [Wasted energy?] (SCP Report No. 126). The Hague, the Netherlands: Social and Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands.
38.
Steg, L. , & Vlek, C. (1997). The role of problem awareness in willingness-to-change car use and in evaluating relevant policy measures. In J. A. Rothengatter & E. Carbonell Vaya (Eds.), Traffic and transport psychology. Theory and application (pp. 465-475). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
39.
Stern, P. C. (1992). What psychology knows about energy conservation. American Psychologist, 47, 1224-1232.
40.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
41.
Stern, P. C. , Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs and pro-environmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1611-1636.
42.
Stern, P. C. , Dietz, T., Ruttan, V. W., Socolow, R. H., & Sweeney, J. L. (Eds., 1997). Environmentally significant consumption. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43.
Van Lange, P.A.M. , Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R. M., & Ruiter, R. A. (1998). A social dilemma analysis of commuting preferences: The roles of social value orientations and trust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 796-820.
44.
Vringer, K. , & Blok, K. (1995) The direct and indirect energy requirements of households in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 23, 893-910.
45.
Vringer, K. , & Blok, K. (1997). Het directe en indirecte energiebeslag van Nederlandse huishoudens in 1995 en een vergelijking met huishoudens in 1990 [Direct and indirect energy use in Dutch households in 1995 and a comparison with households in 1990] (VNSU Report No. 97071). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Vakgroep Natuurwetenschappen en Samenleving, Universiteit Utrecht.
46.
Warriner, G. K. , McDougall, G. H., & Claxton, J. D. (1984). Any data or none at all? Living with inaccuracies in self-reports of residential energy consumption. Environment and Behavior, 16, 503-526.
47.
Whitherspoon, S. , & Martin, J. (1992). What do we mean by green? In R. Jowell, L. Brook, G. Prior, & B. Taylor (Eds.), British social attitudes: The 9th Report (pp. 1-26.). Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
48.
Winett, R. A. , Leckliter, J. N., Chinn, D. E., Stahl, B., & Love, S. Q. (1985). Effects of television modelling on residential energy conservation. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 18, 33-44.
