Approximately 70% of American workers personalize their workspaces. However, some employees personalize more than others, such as managers and employees with enclosed offices. Studies examining personality traits suggest that employees who personalize the most tend to be creative and have a high need for affiliation and a low need for privacy. However, major personality factors have not been examined. This study examines the relationships between workspace personalization and the Big Five personality factors by surveying 234 employees from 33 companies. Results indicate that personality is only indirectly related to personalization through employee characteristics such as status and type of workspace. Personalization is primarily predicted by the company’s personalization policy and an employee’s status and workspace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
2.
Baron, R. , & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
Borden, R. J. , & Francis, J. L. (1978). Who cares about ecology-Personality and sex differences in environmental concern. Journal of Personality, 46, 190-203.
4.
Brill, M. , Margulis, S. T., & Konar, E. (1984). Using design to increase productivity (Vol. 1). Buffalo, NY: Workplace Design and Productivity, Inc.
5.
Brown, B. B. (1987). Territoriality. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 505-531). New York: John Wiley.
6.
Bryant, K. J. (1982). Personality correlates of sense of direction and geographical orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1318-1324.
7.
Cantor, N. (1994). Life task problem solving: Situational affordances and personal needs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 235-243.
8.
Carrère, S. , & Evans, G. W. (1994). Life in an isolated and confined environment: A qualitative study of the role of the designed environment. Environment and Behavior, 26, 707-741.
9.
Carrère, S. , Evans, G. W., & Stokols, D. (1991). Winter-over stress: Physiological and psychological adaptation to an Antarctic isolated and confined environment. In A. A. Harrison, Y. A. Clearwater, & C. P. McKay (Eds.), From Antarctica to outer space: Life in isolation and confinement (pp. 229-237). New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10.
Cherulnik, P. D. , & Koenig, R. L. (1990). Perceptions of the workplace and perceptions of the worker: A potentially practical example of the influence of environmental setting on personal identity. In G. Hardie, R. Moore, & H. Sanoff (Eds.), Changing paradigms: Proceedings from the 20th annual conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 309-312). Oklahoma City: Environmental Design Research Association.
11.
Cherulnik, P. D. , & Souders, S. B. (1986). The social contents of place schemata: People are judged by the places where they live and work. Population and Environment, 7, 211-233.
12.
Costa, P. T., Jr. , & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PR-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13.
Craik, K. H. (1966). The prospects for an environmental psychology (IPAR Research Bulletin). Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Craik, K. H. (1968). The comprehension of the everyday physical environment. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34, 646-658.
15.
Craik, K. H. (1970). Environmental psychology. In K. H. Craik, B. Kleinmuntz, R. L. Rosnow, R. Rosenthal, J. A. Cheyne, & R. H. Walters (Eds.), New directions in psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-122). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
16.
Craik, K. H. (1990). Environmental and personality psychology: Two collective narratives and four individual story lines. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (pp. 141-168). New York: Plenum.
17.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of a five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
18.
Donald, I. (1994). Management and change in office environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 21-30.
19.
Duncan, J. S. (1973). Landscapetasteas a symbol of group identity. Geographical Review, 63, 334-355.
20.
Edney, J. J. , & Buda, M. A. (1976). Distinguishing territoriality and privacy: Two studies. Human Ecology, 4, 283-296.
21.
Endler, N. S. , & Parker, J.D.A. (1992). Interactionism revisited: Reflections on the continuing crisis in the personality area. European Journal of Personality, 6, 177-198.
22.
Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.). (1981). A model for personality. New York: Springer.
23.
Gifford, R. (1980). Environmental dispositions and the evaluation of architectural interiors. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 386-399.
24.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
25.
Goodrich, R. (1986). The perceived office: The office environment as experienced by its users. In J. D. Wineman (Ed.), Behavioral issues in office design (pp. 109-133). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
26.
Hansen, W. B. , & Altman, I. (1976). Decorating personal places: A descriptive analysis. Environment and Behavior, 8, 491-504.
27.
Harris, D. (1991). What do office workers place on their desks and in their offices?Salmagundi, 92, 202-210.
28.
Jewell, L. N. (1998). Contemporary industrial/organizational psychology (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29.
Kegel-Flom, P. (1976). Identifying the potential rural optometrist. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 53, 479-482.
30.
Konar, E. , & Sundstrom, E. (1986). Status demarcation and office design. In J. D. Wineman (Ed.), Behavioral issues in office design (pp. 203-223). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
31.
Little, B. R. (1983). Personal projects: A rationale and method for investigation. Environment and Behavior, 15, 273-309.
32.
Little, B. R. (1987). Personality and the environment. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 205-244). New York: John Wiley.
33.
McAdams, D. P. (1992). The Five-Factor Model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361.
34.
McAdams, D. P. (1994). A psychology of thestranger. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 145-148.
35.
McKechnie, G. E. (1974). Manual for the Environmental Response Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
36.
Nasar, J. L. (1989). Symbolic meanings of house styles. Environment and Behavior, 21, 235-257.
37.
Nideffer, R. M. (1974). Test of Attentional and Interpersonal Style Manual. Rochester, NY: Behavioral Research Applications.
38.
Osborn, D. R. (1988). Personality traits expressed: Interior design as behaviour-setting plan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 368-373.
39.
Pervin, L. A. (1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103-113.
40.
Sadalla, E. K. , & Sheets, V. L. (1993). Symbolism in building materials: Self-presentational and cognitivecomponents. Environment and Behavior, 25, 155-180.
41.
Sadalla, E. K. , Vershure, B., & Burroughs, J. (1987). Identity symbolism in housing. Environment and Behavior, 19, 569-587.
42.
Sarbin, T. R. , & McKechnie, G. E. (1986). Prospects for a contextual theory of personality. In R. L. Rosnow & M. Georgoudi (Eds.), Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science (pp. 187-207). New York: Praeger.
43.
Scheiberg, S. L. (1990). Emotions on display. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 330-338.
44.
Searles, H. F. (1960). The non-human environment: In normal development and in schizophrenia. New York: International Universities Press.
45.
Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy (1994). Handbook of small business data: 1994 edition. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
46.
Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 85-128). San Diego: Academic Press.
47.
Sommer, R. (1974). Tight spaces: Hard architecture and how to humanize it. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48.
Sundstrom, E. (1986). Work places: The psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Thelen, L. A. (1997). Environmental selection: A comparison of the environmental, interpersonal, and intrapsychic domains of personality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
50.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1988). County business patterns, 1988: Technical documentation (CBF-7-88). Washington, DC: Author.
51.
Van Heck, G. L. , Perugini, M., Caprara, G.-V., & Froger, J. (1994). The Big Five as tendencies in situations. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 715-731.
52.
Veroff, J. (1983). Contextual determinants of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 331-343.
53.
Wells, M. (2000). Office clutter or meaningful personal displays: The role of office personalization in employee and organizational well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 239-255.
54.
Wiggins, J. S. , & Pincus, A. L. (1992). Personality: Structure and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 473-504.
55.
Wilson, M. A. , & Mackenzie, N. E. (2000). Social attributions based on domestic interiors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 343-354.
