In the study reported in this article the roles of social cohesion, residential satisfaction, and place identification are examined for their effect on place-related social identity and its consequential impact on attitudes to environmental sustainability. Two neighborhoods in Guildford, Surrey, England were selected on the basis of their social histories, housing types, and socioeconomic composition. Ninety residents in each neighborhood were sampled. Research methods included cognitive mapping and a questionnaire survey. A structural equation model was used to analyze the covariances between the different factors. The results show clear differences between the two neighborhoods in terms of residential satisfaction, with only some differences in terms of identification and social cohesion and sustainability. Conclusions are drawn that suggest an important relationship between identity and sustainability behavior that is suggestive for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS Structural Equations Program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
2.
Breakwell, G. M. (1986). Coping with threatened identity. London: Methuen.
3.
Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.
4.
Festinger, L. , Schacter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressure in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
Geller, E. S. , Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment: Strategies for behavior change. New York: Pergamon.
6.
Gerson, K. , Stueve, C. A., & Fischer, C. (1977). Attachment to place. In C. Fischer (Ed.), Networks and places—Social relations in the urban setting. New York: Free Press.
7.
Gifford, R. (1997). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
Groat, L. (1994). Carbuncles, columns and pyramids, lay and expert evaluations of contextual design strategies. In B. C. Scheer & W.F.E. Preiser (Eds.), Design review, challenging urban aesthetic control (pp. 156-164). New York: Chapman & Hall.
9.
Harland, P. , Langzaal, J., Staats, H. J., & Weenig, W. (1993). The EcoTeam Program in the Netherlands: A pilot study of the background and experiences of the Global Action Plan. Leiden, the Netherlands: Werkgroep Energie-En Milieuonderzoek.
10.
Hubbard, P. (1994). Professional vs. lay tastes in design control—An empirical investigation. Planning Practice and Research, 9(3), 271-287.
11.
Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modelling. In L. G. Grim & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 227-260). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
Korosec-Serfaty, P. (1976). L’appropiation de l’espace [The appropriation of space]. Louvain la Neuve, Belgium: CIACO.
13.
Korpela, K. (1989). Place identity as a product of environmental self regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 241-256.
14.
Lalli, M. (1988). Urban identity. In D. Canter (Ed.), Environmental social psychology (NATO Advanced Studies Institute Series, Behavioral and Social Sciences, pp. 303-311). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
15.
Lalli, M. (1992). Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 285-305.
16.
Lee, S. Y. , Poon, W. Y., & Bentler, P. M. (1992). Structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. Psychometrika, 57, 89-105.
17.
Lord, J. D. , & Rent, G. S. (1987). Residential satisfaction in scattered-site public-housing projects. Social Science Journal, 24(3), 287-302.
18.
Mertz, C. , Slovic, P., & Purchase, I. (1998). Judgments of chemical risks: Comparisons among senior managers, toxicologists, and the public. Risk Analysis, 18, 391-404.
19.
Moreno, E. , & Pol, E. (1999). Nociones psicosociales para la intervención y la gestión ambiental [Psychosocial notions for environmental intervention and management] (Monografies Psico/Socio/Ambientals, Vol. 14). Barcelona, Spain: University of Barcelona.
20.
Moscovici, S. (1972). Society and theory in social psychology. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 17-68). London: Academic Press.
21.
Moser, G. , & Uzzell, D. L. (in press). Environmental psychology. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner, (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Volume 5. Personality and social psychology. New York: John Wiley.
22.
Mosler, H. J. (1993). Self-dissemination of environmentally-responsible behavior. The influence of trust in a commons dilemma game. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(2), 111-123.
23.
Nord, M. , Luloff, A., & Bridger, J. (1998). The association of forest recreation with environmentalism. Environment & Behavior, 30, 235-246.
24.
Pol, E. (1996). La apropriación del espacio [The appropriation of space]. In L. Iñiguez & E. Pol (Comps.), Cognición, representación y apropriación del espacio (Monografies Psico/Socio/Ambientals, Vol. 9). Barcelona, Spain: University of Barcelona. (Original work published 1994)
25.
Pol, E. (1998a). Evoluciones de la psicología ambiental hacia la sostenibilidad: Tres propuestas teóricas y orientaciones para la gestión [Evolution of environmental psychology to sustainability. Three theoretical propositions and strategies for management]. In D. Paez & S. Ayestaran (Eds.), Los desarrollos de la psicología social en España (pp. 105-120). Madrid, Spain: Infancia y Aprendizaje.
26.
Pol, E. (1998b). Sostenibilitat, valors socials i comportament humà. estratègies i contradiccions [Sustainability, social values and human behavior. Strategies and contradictions]. In R. Folch, T. Franquesa, E. Pol, E. Ferreres, R. Díez Hochleitner, & R. Margalef (Eds.), Desenvolupament sostenible.Els llindars en la construcció de les relacions humanes i el medi ambient. Pensaments (Vol. 7, pp. 45-66). Lleida, Spain: University of Lleida.
27.
Pol, E., Guàrdia, J., Valera, S., Lopez, R., Iñiguez, L., & Jimenez, B. (1996). Propuesta y proyecto de una red de investigación Ciudad-Identidad-Sostenibilidad [Proposition and project of a network research on City-Identity and Sustainability]. Unpublished document.
28.
Proshansky, H. , Fabian, A., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
29.
Schneider, G. (1986). Psychological identity of and identification with urban neighborhoods. In D. Frick (Ed.), The quality of urban life (pp. 203-218). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
30.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
31.
Staats, H. J. , & Harland, P. (1997). The EcoTeam Program: Changing ecological behavior by information, feedback and social support. In R. Garcia-Mira, C. Arce, & J. M. Sabucedo (Eds.), Responsabilidad ecológica y gestión de los recursos ambientales (pp. 265-293). A Coruña, Spain: Diputación Provincial de A Coruña.
32.
Stokols, D. , & Shumaker, S. (1981). People in place: A transactional view of settings. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior and the environment (pp. 441-488). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Turner, J. C. (1990). Redescubrir el grupo social. Madrid, Spain: Morata. (Original work published 1987)
34.
Twigger-Ross, D. , & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 205-220.
35.
Uzzell, D. L. (1995). Creating place identity through heritage interpretation. The International Journal of Heritage Studies, 1(4), 219-228.
36.
Uzzell, D. L. (1998, July). Treading lightly towards environmental sustainability: Policy and practice in a spiritual context. Paper presented at the International Association for People-Environment Studies Conference (IAPS15) Conference, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
37.
Valera, S. (1993). El simbolisme de la ciutat.Funcions de l’espai simbòlic urbà [Symbolism of the city. Functions of symbolic urban space]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Barcelona, Spain.
38.
Valera, S. , & Pol, E. (1994). El concepto de identidad social urbana. Una aproximación entre la psicología social y la psicología ambiental [The concept of urban social identity. An approach between social psychology and environmental psychology]. Anuario de Psicología, 62(3), 5-24.
39.
Van Lange, P.A.M. , Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R. M., & Ruiter, R. A. (1998). A social dilemma analysis of commuting preferences: The roles of social value orientations and trust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(9), 796-820.
40.
Vlek, C. , Hendrickx, L., & Steg, L. (1994). A social dilemmas analysis of motorised-transport problems and six general strategies for social behavior change. In Transport policy and global warming (pp. 209-225). Paris: European Conference of Ministers of Transport.
41.
Winkel, G. H. (1981). The perception of neighborhood change. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 489-512). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
