Defensible space (DS) theory proposes that the built environment can promote neighborhood safety and community by encouraging residents’ appropriation of near-home space. This article examined the relationship between three different forms of resident appropriation and residents’ experiences of neighborhood safety and community. Results from a survey of 91 public housing residents living in moderately defensible spaces suggested that residents who defended near-home space through territorial appropriation experienced the neighborhood as a safer, more cohesive community than did residents who did not appropriate space in this way. Residents who spent more time outside experienced the neighborhood as a safer place; however, casual social interaction in near-home space was not consistently related to outcomes. While no causal information is available from the correlational data presented here, this work takes an important step of providing empirical evidence of a systematic link between certain aspects of resident appropriation and positive outcomes. Implications for DS theory and for public housing policy are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beck, R. J. , & Teasdale, P. (1978). Dimensions of social life style in multiple dwelling housing. In A. Esser & B. B. Greenbie (Eds.), Design for communality and privacy.New York: Plenum.
2.
Becker, F. D. (1977). Housing messages. Stoudsberg, PA: Dawden, Hutchinson, & Ross.
3.
Bhana, A. (1995). Experiences and perceptions of danger among urban adolescents (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(09-B), 5158-5158.
4.
Booth, A. (1981). The built environment as a crime deterrent: A re-examination of defensible space. Criminology, 18, 557-570.
5.
Brodsky, A. E. (1996). Resilient single mothers in risky neighborhoods: Negative psychological sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 347-363.
6.
Brown, B. B. , & Bentley, D. L. (1993). Residential burglars judge risk: The role of territoriality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 51-61.
7.
Buckner, J. C. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 771-791.
8.
Campbell, K. E. , & Lee, B. A. (1992). Sources of personal neighbor networks: Social integration, need, or time?Social Forces, 70, 1077-1100.
9.
Chenoweth, R. E. (1977). The effects of territorial marking on residents of two multi-family housing developments: A partial test of Newman’s theory of defensible space (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 38(10-B), 5088-5088.
10.
Cisneros, H. G. (1995). Defensible space: Deterring crime and building community. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
11.
Coleman, A. (1987). Utopia on trial: Vision and reality in planned housing. London: Shipman.
12.
Conan, M. (1992). Negotiating public space. Architecture and Comportment, 8, 11-22.
13.
Cooper, C. C. (1975). Easter Hill Village: Some social implications of design. New York: Free Press.
14.
Coulton, C. J. , Korbin, J. E., & Su, M. (1996). Measuring neighborhood context for young children in an urban area. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 5-32.
15.
Covington, J. , & Taylor, R. B. (1991). Fear of crime in urban residential neighborhoods: Implications of between and within neighborhood sources for current models. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 231-249.
16.
Evans, G. W. , & McCoy, J. M (1998). When buildings don’t work: The role of architecture in human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 85-94.
17.
Feldman, R. M. , & Stall, S. (1994). The politics of space appropriation: A case study of women’s struggles for homeplace in Chicago public housing. In I. Altman & A. Churchman (Eds.), Women and the environment. Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 13). New York: Plenum.
18.
Franck, K. (1978). Community by design: A study of moderate income, federally assisted housing developments (Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International, 39(05-B), 2569-2569.
19.
Fyans, L. J. (1983). Multi-level analyses and cross-level inference of validity using generalizability theory. New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 18, 49-66.
20.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Greenberg, S. W. , & Rohe, W. M. (1986). Informal social control and crime prevention in modern urban neighborhoods. In R. B. Taylor (Ed.), Urban neighborhoods: Research and policy (pp. 79-118). New York: Praeger.
22.
Greenberg, S. W. , Rohe, W. M., & Williams, J. R. (1981). Safe and secure neighborhoods: Physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
23.
Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101, 336-342.
24.
Hand, L. (1977, March). Cincinnati Housing Authority builds safety into project. HUD Challenge, 8, 12-14.
25.
Heinzelman, F. (1981). Crime prevention and the physical environment. In D. A. Lewis (Ed.), Reactions to crime (pp. 87-101). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
Hunter, J. (1978, October 11). Defensible space in practice. The Architects’ Journal, 675-677.
27.
Jarrett, R. L. (1997). African American family and parenting strategies in impoverished neighborhoods. Qualitative Sociology, 20, 275-288.
28.
Jeffrey, C. R. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
Kasarda, J., D. , & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328-339.
30.
Kohn, I. (1975). Defensible space modifications in a row house community. New York: Institute for Community Design and Analysis.
31.
Korbin, J. E. , & Coulton, C. J. (1997). Understanding the neighborhood context for children and families: Combining epidemiological and ethnographic approaches. In J. Brooks-Gunn, G. J. Duncan, & J. L. Aber (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Context and consequences for children (pp. 77-91). New York: Russel Sage Foundation Press.
32.
Lavrakas, P. (1982). Fear of crime and behavioral restrictions in urban and suburban neighborhoods. Population and Environment, 5, 242-264.
33.
Mawby, R. I. (1977). Defensible space: A theoretical and empirical appraisal. Urban Studies, 14, 169-179.
34.
Mayhew, P. (1979). Defensible space: The current status of a crime prevention theory. Howard Journal of Penology and Crime Prevention, 18, 150-159.
35.
McCarthy, D. , & Saegert, S. (1979). Residential density, social overload, and social withdrawal. In J. R. Aiello & A. Baum (Eds.), Residential crowding and design (pp. 55-75). New York: Plenum.
36.
Merry, S. E. (1981). Defensible space undefended. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 16, 397-422.
37.
Newman, O. (1973). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Collier.
38.
Newman, O. (1996). Creating defensible space. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
39.
Newman, O. , & Franck, K. (1980). Factors influencing crime and instability in urban housing developments. Washington, DC: National Institute for Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
40.
Newman, O. , & Franck, K. (1982). The effects of building size on personal crime and fear of crime. Population & Environment, 5, 203-220.
41.
Normoyle, J. B. , & Lavrakas, P. (1984). Fear of crime in elderly women: Perceptions of control, predictability, and territoriality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 191-202.
42.
O’Brien, R. M. (1990). Estimating the reliability of aggregate-level variables based on individual-level characteristics. Sociological Methods and Research, 18(4), 473-504.
43.
Perkins, D. D. (n.d.) Poplar Grove Environmental Inventory. Unpublished manuscript, University of Utah at Salt Lake City.
44.
Perkins, D. D. , Florin, P., Rich, R. C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D. M. (1990). Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 83-115.
45.
Perkins, D. D. , Meeks, J. W., & Taylor, R. B. (1992). The physical environment of street blocks and resident perceptions of crime and disorder: Implications for theory and measurement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 21-34.
46.
Perkins, D. D. , & Taylor, R. B. (1996). Ecological assessments of community disorder: Their relationships to fear of crime and theoretical implications. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 63-108.
47.
Perkins, D. D. , Wandersman, A. H., Rich, R. C., & Taylor, R. B. (1993). The physical environment of street crime: Defensible space, territoriality and incivilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 29-49.
48.
Riger, S. , & Lavrakas, P. J. (1981). Community ties: Patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 55-66.
49.
Robinson, D. , & Wilkinson, D. (1995). Sense of community in a remote mining town: Validating a neighborhood cohesion scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 137-148.
50.
Rohe, W. M. , & Burby, R. J. (1988). Fear of crime in public housing. Environment & Behavior, 20, 700-720.
51.
Rothenbuhler, E. W. (1991). The process of community involvement. Communication Monographs, 58, 63-78.
52.
Rubenstein, H. , Murray, C., Motoyama, T., Rouse, W. V., & Titus, R. M. (1980). The link between crime and the built environment: The current state of knowledge. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
53.
Skjaeveland, O. , & Gärling, T. (1997). Effects of interactional space on neighbouring. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 181-198.
54.
Stack, C. B. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a Black community. New York: Harper & Row.
55.
Taylor, R. B. (1988). Human territorial functioning: An empirical, evolutionary perspective on individual and small group territorial cognitions, behaviors, and consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Taylor, R. B. , & Covington, J. (1993). Community structural change and fear of crime. Social Problems, 40, 374-397.
57.
Taylor, R. B. , Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1980). The defensibility of defensible space: A critical review and a synthetic framework for future research. In T. Hirschi & M. Gottfredson (Eds.), Understanding crime (pp. 53-71). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58.
Taylor, R. B. , Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1984). Block crime and fear. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(1), 113-155.
59.
Taylor, R. B. , & Hale, M. M. (1986). Testing alternative models of fear of crime. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 151-189.
60.
Unger, D. G. , & Wandersman, A. (1982). Neighboring in an urban environment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 493-509.
61.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development . (1998). Crime prevention through environmental design [On-line]. Available: http://www.hud.gov/progdesc/cpted.html
62.
Wandersman, A. , & Giamartino, G. A. (1980). Community and individual difference characteristics as influences on initial participation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 217-228.
63.
Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39, 40-49.
64.
Wellman, B. , & Leighton, B. (1979). Networks, neighbors, and community: Approaches to the study of the community question. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14, 363-390.
65.
Wilson, J. Q. , & Kelling, G. L. (1982, March). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic Monthly, pp. 29-38.
66.
Wilson, S. (1978, October 11). Updating defensible space. The Architects’ Journal, 674-674.
67.
Yancey, W. L. (1971). Architecture, interaction, and social control: The case of a large-scale public housing project. Environment & Behavior, 3, 3-21.
68.
Zaff, B. S. (1995). Designing with affordances in mind. In J. Flach, P. Hancock, J. Caird, & K. Vicente (Eds.), Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
