This study examined the difference between environmental attitudes of university students in England, Denmark, and the United States. The results indicate that there is a significant relationship between attitudes toward technology, politics, and economics, the primary elements of the dominant social paradigm (DSP), and environmental attitudes. Specifically, as beliefs in the elements of the DSP increase, the perception of the existence of environmental problems decreases. As a result of this decrease, perceived changes necessary to alleviate environmental problems also decreases. The results also indicate that there is a direct relationship between the DSP and perceived change. The policy implications of this result suggest that what is needed is not only increased concern for the environment, but also, education about the DSP and its effect on the environment. Individuals may then break the cycles of technological advance, increased consumption, and reform politics, all of which appear to be complicit in environmental decline.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armor, D. J. (1974). Theta reliability and factor scaling. In H. L. Costner (Ed.). Sociological methodology (pp. 17-50). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Balderjahn, I. (1988, August). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17, 51-56.
3.
Burgenmeier, B. (Ed.). (1994). Economy, environment, and technology: A socio-economic approach. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
4.
Bury, J. B. (1932). The idea of progress. New York: Macmillan.
5.
Cotgrove, S. (1982). Catastrophe or cornucopia: The environment, politics, and the future. New York: Wiley.
6.
Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady-state economics. Washington, DC: Island Press.
7.
Daly, H. E. , & Townsend, K. N. (Eds.). (1993). Valuing the earth: Economics, ecology, ethics. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
8.
Dietz, T. , Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment & Behavior, 30, 450-471.
9.
Dobson, A. (1990). Green political thought. London: Harper Collins Academic.
10.
Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational ecology: Environment and political economy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Dryzek, J. S. (1996). Democracy in capitalist times: Ideals, limits, and struggles. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
Dunlap, R. E. , & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”: A proposed instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
13.
Dunlap, R. E. , & Van Liere, K. D. (1984). Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013-1028.
14.
Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
Ehrenfeld, D. (1978). The arrogance of humanism. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Grunert, S. C. , & Juhl, H. J. (1995). Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 39-62.
18.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
19.
Heilbroner, R. L. (1985). The nature and logic of capitalism. New York: Norton.
20.
Joreskog, K. G. , & Sorbom, D. (1993). New features in prelis 2. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
21.
Kilbourne, W. E. (1999). Contestedrationalities in the ecological crisis. In T. A. Klein, P. McDonagh, & A. Prothero (Eds.), Sustainable consumption and ecological challenges (pp. 234-242). Nebraska City: University of Nebraska College of Business.
22.
Kilbourne, W. E. , & Beckmann, S. C. (1998). Review and critical assessment of research on marketing and the environment. Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 513-532.
23.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality?Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
25.
MacPherson, C. B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
26.
Milbrath, L. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguards for a new society. Albany: University of New York Press.
27.
Ophuls, W. (1977). Ecology and the politics of scarcity: A prologue to a political theory of the steady state. San Francisco: Freeman.
28.
O’Riordan, T. (1976). Environmentalism. London: Pion Limited.
29.
Peter, J. P. (1979). Reliability: A review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 6-17.
30.
Pirages, D. C. , & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Ark II: Social response to environmental imperatives. San Francisco: Freeman.
31.
Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books.
32.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
Rifkin, J. (1980). Entropy. New York: Bantam Books.
34.
Sagoff, M. (1988). The economy of earth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy’s discontent. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
36.
Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350-353.
37.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects of the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
38.
Stern, P. C. , Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment & Behavior, 27, 723-743.
39.
Stern, P. C. , Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment & Behavior, 25, 322-348.
40.
Sunstein, C. R. (1997). Free markets and social justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
Swaney, J. A. (1987). Elements of a neoinstitutional environmental economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 21, 1739-1779.
42.
Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
