Can Suppressor Variables Enhance Criterion-Related Validity in the Personality Domain?

Abstract

The practical value to organizations and to society of even small increments to validity from suppressor effects may be substantial. This study empirically examined the potential importance of suppressor variables in the personality domain. Of the five suppressor variables tentatively identified in the initial validation sample, four were found to hold up in an independent cross-validation sample. The suppressor variables increased the cross-validated multiple r from .61 to .68 (an 11% increase). The authors argue that, in addition to potential increments to prediction, suppressor variables in the personality domain may also contribute to substantive knowledge and theory development. The authors recommend that examination of potential suppressors be a more frequent component of research and analysis in the personality domain.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Collins, J. M. , & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Personality, integrity and white collar crime: A construct validity study. Personnel Psychology, 46, 295-312.

Conger, A. J. , & Jackson, D. N. (1972). Suppressor variables, prediction, and the interpretation of psychological relationships. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 579-599.

Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.

Gough, H. G. (1987). The California Psychological Inventory administrator's guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Horst, P. (1941). The prediction of personal adjustment. Social Science Research Council, Bulletin 48, 431-436.

Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 340-362.

Jensen, A. R. (1986). G: Artifact or reality? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 301-331.

Lord, F. M. , & Novick, R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

10.

Lubin, A. (1957). Some formulae for use with suppressor variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 17, 286-296.

11.

McNemar, Q. (1945). The mode of operation of suppressant variables. American Journal of Psychology, 58, 554-555.

12.

Meehl, P. E. (1945). A simple algebraic development of Horst's suppressor variables. American Journal of Psychology, 58, 550-554.

13.

Megargee, E. I. (1972). The California Psychological Inventory handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

14.

Mendershausen, H. (1939). Clearing variates in confluence analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 34, 93-105.

15.

Owens, W. A. , & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1979). Toward a classification of persons. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 569-607.

16.

Paajanen, G. E. (1986, August). Development and validation of the PD! Employment Inventory. Paper presented at the 94th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

17.

Paajanen, G. E. (1988). The prediction of counterproductive behavior by individual and organizational variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

18.

SAS Institute, Inc. (1991). SAS user's guide. Cary, NC: Author.

19.

Schmidt, F. L. , Ones, D. S. , & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 627-670.

20.

Schmitt, N. W. , & Klimoski, R. J. (1991). Research methods in human resource management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.

21.

Thompson, B. (1985). Alternate methods for analyzing data from education experiments. Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 50-55.

22.

Thompson, B. (1994). Guidelines for authors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837-847.

23.

Thompson, B. (1995). Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analysis need not apply here: A guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 525-534.

24.

Thorndike, R. L. (1986). The role of general ability in prediction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 332-339.

25.

Tzelgov, J. , & Henik, A. (1991). Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 524-536.