A computer simulation study compared significance tests of correlation coefficients calculated from initial scores, from ranks assigned by the Spearman method, and from three kinds of modified ranks in which N sample values were replaced by N12, N/3, and N14 integers. Tests based on the initial scores are more powerful than those based on the various ranks for normal distributions, whereas the reverse is true for mixed-normal, exponential, and Cauchy distributions. Probabilities of Type I and Type II errors are unaffected by reduction in the number of ranks. Implications of these findings for the notion that rank correlation is a nonparametric correlation method are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Box, G. E. P. and Muller, M. (1958). A note on the generation of normal deviates. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 610-611.
2.
Conover, W. J. (1980). Practical nonparametric statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
3.
Conover, W. J. and Iman, R. L. (1981). Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. The American Statistician, 35, 124-129.
4.
Devroye, L. (1986). Non-uniform random variate generation. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5.
Edgell, S. E. and Noon, S. M. (1984). Effect of violation of normality on the t test of the correlation coefficient. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 576-583.
6.
Fowler, R. L. (1987). Power and robustness in product-moment correlation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 419-428.
7.
Green, R. F. (1976). Outlier-prone and outlier-resistant distributions. Joumal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 502-505.
8.
Hampel, F. R. , Ronchetti, E. M., Rousseeuw, P. J. and Stahel, W. A. (1986). Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions. New York: Wiley.
9.
Havlicek, L. L. and Peterson, N. L. (1977). Effect of the violation of assumptions upon significance levels of the Pearson. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 373-377.
10.
Hodges, J. and Lehmann, E. (1956). The efficiency of some nonparametric competitors of the t-test. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 324-335.
11.
Marsaglia, G. and Bray, T. A. (1964). A convenient method for generating normal variables. SL4M Review 6, 260-264.
12.
Neyman, J. and Scott, E. L. (1971). Outlier proneness of phenomena and of related distributions. In Jagdish S. Rustagi (Ed.), Optimizing Methods in Statistics. New York: Academic Press.
13.
Norris, R. C. and Hjelm, H. F. (1961). Non normality and productmoment correlation. Journal of Experimental Education, 29, 261-270.
14.
Randles, R. H. and Wolfe, D. A. (1979). Introduction to the theory of nonparametric statistics. New York: Wiley.
15.
Rasmussen, J. L. (1986). An evaluation of parametric and nonparametric tests on modified and non-modified data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 39, 213-220.
16.
Zimmerman, D. W. and Zumbo, B. D. (1993). The relative power of parametric and nonparametric statistical methods. In Keren, G. & Lewis, C. (Eds.), Methodological and quantitative issues in the analysis of psychological data. pp. 481-517. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
