Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Six hierarchical clustering methods were applied to subtest intercorrelations for each of the nine age groups in the WAIS-R standardization sample. The multiple-methods approach was adopted to overcome method-dependent results and to challenge the stability of clusters across methods. The WAIS-R number-of-factors issue was addressed by observing the agglomeration procedure when data were at a three-cluster solution, followed by a two-cluster solution. The 114 clustering results were interpreted by(a) summarizing cluster membership of subtests across age groups and methods and (b) quantitatively comparing obtained results with results expected by the historical two- and three-factor solutions for the WAIS-R. Varying degrees of support were found for "g," two-, and three-factors. Results of this hierarchical examination of the WAIS-R constructs, coupled with the history of evidence for all three structures of the WAIS-R, points to the possibility of three simultaneously, plausible solutions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderberg, M. R. (1973). Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press.

Dreger, R. M. (1986). Microcomputer programs for the Rand Index of cluster similarity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 655-661.

Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior I: On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097-1126.

Epstein, S. (1980). The stability of behavior II: Implications for psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 799-806.

Fraboni, M. and Cooper, D. (1989). Six clustering algorithms applied to the WAIS-R: The problem of dissimilar cluster results. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 932-935.

Fraboni, M. , Saltstone, R. , and Cooper, D. (1989). A multiple-methods approach to the investigation of WAIS-R constructs employing cluster analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 325-332.

Hill, T. D. , Reddon, J. R. , and Jackson, D. N. (1985). The factor structure of the Wechsler scales: A brief review. Clinical Psychology Review, 5, 287-306.

Leckliter, I. N. , Matarazzo, J. D. , and Silverstein, A. B. (1986). A literature review of factor analytic studies of the WAIS-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 332-342.

Rand, W. M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 846-850.

10.

Romesburg, H. C. (1984). Cluster analysis for researchers. Belmont, California: Lifetime Learning Publications.

11.

Saltstone, R. and Fraboni, M. (1990). An empirical demonstration of the problem of cluster dissimilarity from different clustering methods in a single sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 930-933.

12.

Silverstein, A. B. (1985). Cluster analysis of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 98-100.

13.

Thieret, N. L. and Anderson, D. H. (1985). Cluster analytic methods applied to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in a psychiatric population. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 197-202.

14.

Wechsler, D. (1955). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. New York: Psychological Corporation.

15.

Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

The Wais-R Number-Of-Factors Quandary:A Cluster Analytic Approach Toconstruct Validation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References