Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Since Horst (1941) first discussed and defined the suppressor variable in multiple regression/correlation, a number of more nearly precise definitions has been offered (Cohen and Cohen, 1975; Conger, 1974; Darlington, 1968; Velicer, 1978). This paper compares the different approaches to defining suppression, and illustrates the differences among them. Velicer's definition, which is based on the semi-partial correlation coefficient or usefulness and which is perhaps the least well known of the definitions, is shown to have several important practical advantages relative to the other definitions. The paper extends Velicer's usefulness definition to the general multiple predictor case and to analysis of variance (ANOVA) applications of multiple regression. A test for determining the significance of a suppressor effect is suggested, which is based on Velicer's definition of suppression.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ager, J. W. and Williams, D. L. (1975). On the analysis of Vaught's semi-experimental design. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 869-871.

Appelbaum, M. I. and Cramer, E. M. (1974). Some problems on the nonorthogonal analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 335-343.

Cascio, W. F. (1978). Applied Psychology in Personnel Management. Resten, VA: Resten Publishing Company.

Cohen, J. and Cohen P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.

Conger, A. J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 35-46.

Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161-182.

Horst, P. (1941). The prediction of personal adjustment. Social Science Research Council Bulletin, No. 48. New York: Social Science Research Council.

Kukuk, C. R. , Levine, D. U. , and Meyer, J. K. (1979, April). An analysis with illustrations of suppressor variables in social science research. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.

Lord, F. M. and Novick, R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

10.

McFatter, R. M. (1979). The use of structural equation models in interpreting regression equations in suppressor and enhancer variables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 123-135.

11.

O'Brien, R. G. (1976). Comment on "Some problems in the nonorthogonal analysis of variance." Psychological Bulletin, 83, 72-74.

12.

Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Reinhart, Winston.

13.

Rosenberg, M. (1968). The logic of survey analysis. New York: Basic Books.

14.

Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.

15.

Tzelgov, J. and Henik, A. (1981). On the differences between Conger's and Velicer's definitions of suppression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1027-1031.

16.

Velicer, W. F. (1978). Suppressor variables and the semipartial correlation coefficient. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 953-958.

17.

Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Suppressor Variables in Multiple Regression/Correlation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References