The presence report describes a computer program, ALPHAMAX, that can be employed to evaluate the internal consistency reliability of test data, and to help the researcher during test development in selecting item subsets that may maximize coefficient alpha. The program also invokes a "bootstrap" type logic to evaluate the generalizability of conclusions regarding optimal item subsets.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
2.
Borrello, G. and Thompson, B. (1989). A replication "bootstrap" analysis of the structure underlying perceptions of stereotypic love. Journal of General Psychology, 116, 317-327.
3.
Crocker, L. and Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4.
Melancon, J. and Thompson, B. (1988, November). Latent trait measurement calibrations for the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Louisville, KY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 300 463)
5.
Thompson, B. (1987, April). The use (and misuse) of statistical significance testing: Some recommendations for improved editorial policy and practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 287 868)
6.
Thompson, B. (1988a, November). Common methodology mistakes in dissertations: Improving dissertation quality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Louisville, KY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 301 595)
7.
Thompson, B. (1988b). A note on statistical significance testing. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 20(4), 146-148.
8.
Thompson, B. (1989a). Asking "what if' questions about significance tests. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22(2), 66-68.
9.
Thompson, B. (1989b). Statistical significance, result importance, and result generalizability: Three noteworthy but somewhat different issues. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22(1), 2-5.
10.
Thompson, B. (1989c, January). Why generalizability coefficients are an essential aspect of reliability assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Houston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED??????).
11.
Thompson, B. (1989d). Why won't stepwise methods die?Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21(4), 146-148.
12.
Thompson, B. and Levitov, J. E. (1985). Using microcomputers to score and evaluate test items. Collegiate Microcomputer, 3, 163-168.
13.
Willson, V. L. (1980). Reserach techniques in AERJ articles: 1969 to 1978. Educational Researcher, 9(6), 5-10.