This paper describes a computer program which performs the comparison of oral response errors to stimulus words visually presented for recognition. Errors are compared and analyzed on 50 graphophonic featural dimensions. The merits of the program for facilitating certain aspects of word learning research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barr, R. B.Processes underlying the learning of the printed word. The Elementary School Journal, 1975, 75, 258-269.
2.
Ceprano, M.The effects of two instructional procedures on featural attention and word learning of children beginning to read. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1980.
3.
Davidson, H. P.An experimental study of bright, average and dull children at the four year mental level. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1931, 9, 110-290.
4.
Gates, A. I. and Boeker, E.A study of intitial stages in reading by preschool children . Teachers College Record, 1923, 24, 469-488.
5.
Huey, E. B.The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1908.
6.
Marchbanks, G. and Levin, H.Cues by which children recognize words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965, 56, 57-61.
7.
Smith, F.Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
8.
Weber, R.A linguistic analysis of first-grade reading errors. Reading Research Quarterly, 1970, 5, 427-451.
9.
Wiley, W. E.Difficult words and the beginner . Journal of Educational Research, 1928 , 17, 278-289.
10.
Williams, J. P., Blumberg, E. L., and Williams, D. V.Cues used in visual word recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970, 61,310-315.
