The problem of demonstrating the invariance of factor structures across criterion groups is addressed. Procedures are outlined which combine the replication of factor structures across four sex-race groups with the use of the coefficient of invariance to demonstrate the level of invariance associated with the factors identified in a self concept measure (the Self Observation Scales, Intermediate Form A). Implications for hypothesis testing are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Burt, C.The factorial study of temperament traits. British Journal of Psychology (Statistical Section) , 1948, 1, 178-203.
2.
Carpenter T. R. and Busse, T. V.Development of self-concept in Negro and white welfare children. Child Development, 1969, 40, 935-939.
3.
Cattell, R. B.The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In R. B. Cattell (Ed.). Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1966
4.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L.Equality of educational opportunity . Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1966.
5.
Cotler S. and Palmer, R. J.The relationships among sex, sociometric, self, and test anxiety factors and the academic achievement of elementary school children . Psychology in the Schools, 1970, 7, 211-216.
6.
Eysenck, H. J. and Eysenck, S. B. G.Personality structure and measurement. San Diego, Calif.: Robert R. Knapp, 1969.
7.
Getsinger, S. H., Kunce, J. T., Miller, D. E., and Weinberg, S. R.Self-esteem measures and cultural disadvantagement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 1972, 38, 149.
8.
Gorsuch, R. L.Factor analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1974 .
9.
Guertin, W. H. and Jourard, S. M.Characteristics of real-self ideal-self discrepancy scores revealed by factor analysis. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1962, 26, 241-245.
10.
Guttman, L.The determinacy of factor score matrices with implications for five other basic problems of common factor theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1955, 8, 65.
11.
Harmon, H. H.Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
12.
Kaiser, H. F.Relating factors between studies based upon different individuals. Unpublished manuscript, 1960.
13.
Katzenmeyer, W. G. and Stenner, A. J.Self observation scales— intermediate level . Durham, N.C.: National Testing Service, 1973.
14.
Katzenmeyer, W. G. and Stenner, A. J.Strategic use of random subsample replication and a coefficient of factor replicability. Education and Psychological Measurement, 1975, 35, 19-29.
15.
Nesselroade, J. R., Baltes, P. B., and Labouvie, E. W.Evaluating factor invariance in oblique space: Baseline data generated from random numbers. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1971, 6, 233-241.
16.
Ozehosky, R. J. and Clark, E. T.Verbal and non-verbal measures of self-concept among kindergarten boys and girls. Psychological Reports, 1971, 28, 195-199.
17.
Pinneau, S. R., and Newhouse, A.Measures of invariance and comparability in factor analysis for fixed variables. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 271-281.
18.
Soares, A. T. and Soares, L. M.Critique of Soares and Soares' "Self-perceptions of culturally disadvantaged children"—A reply. American Educational Research Journal, 1970, 7, 631-635.
19.
Tucker, L. R., a Method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Personnel Research Section Report No. 984. Washington, D. C.: Department of the Army, 1951.
20.
Wrigley, C. and Neuhaus, J. O.The matching of two sets of factors. Paper presented to the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, September 1955.
