Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The harmonic mean and Kramer procedures have been recommended for use with the Tukey multiple comparison test when group sizes are unequal. The only study that has compared these procedures maximally varied the disparity between the groups for a 3: 1 difference. The present investigation varied the disparity between the groups, the number of groups and the nominal significance levels. It was found that rarely did the empirical Type I error probabilities exceed their nominal significance levels by more than 1 percent even when the groups differed by 40:1. The Kramer estimates were typically less than the nominal significance levels while the harmonic mean estimates were generally larger than the true alphas.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Box, G. E. P. and Muller, M. A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958, 29, 611.

Ibm. 360 Scientific Subroutine Package (360A-CM-03X) Programmer's Manual, H20-0205. 1970, International Business Machines Corporation.

Kirk, R. E. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1968.

Kramer, C. Y. Extension of multiple range test to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics, 1956, 12, 307-310.

Miller, R. G., Jr. Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1966.

Smith, R. A. The effect of unequal group size on Tukey's HSD procedure. Psychometrika, 1971, 36, 31-34.

Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. Principles and procedures of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.

Tukey, J. W. The problem of multiple comparisons . Unpublished manuscript, 1953.

Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design. (2nd ed.). New York : McGraw-Hill, 1971.

Effect of Very Unequal Group Sizes On Tukey's Multiple Comparison Test

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References