The authors used a rational-empirical approach to construct the Student Readiness Inventory, measuring psychosocial and academic-related skill factors found to predict two important college outcomes, academic performance and retention, in a recent meta-analysis. The initial item pool was administered to 5,970 first-year college students and high school seniors to empirically validate and cross-validate the underlying factor structure. Ten first-order and 3 second-order factors were derived, partially resembling the original conceptual model. Future study is needed to explore the criterion and predictive validities of the factors constituting this inventory.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Authors.
2.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
3.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
4.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-25.
5.
Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12, 155-187.
6.
Bean, J. P. (1985). Interaction effects based on class level in an explanatory model of college student dropout syndrome. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 35-64.
7.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
8.
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
9.
Brown, N., & Cross, E. J. (1993). Retention in engineering and personality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 661-671.
10.
Budaev, S.V. (1999). Sex differences in the Big Five personality factors: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 801-813.
11.
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
12.
Caligiuri, P. M. (2000). The Big Five personality characteristics as predictors of expatriate’s desire to terminate the assignment and supervisor-rated performance. Personnel Psychology, 53, 67-88.
13.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. V. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
14.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
15.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 319-338.
16.
Charbonneau, D., & Nicol, A. M. (2002). Emotional intelligence and prosocial behaviors in adolescents. Psychological Reports, 90, 361-370.
17.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
18.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
19.
Covington, M. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
20.
Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
22.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
23.
Evans, J. H., & Burck, H. D. (1992). The effects of career education interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71, 63-68.
24.
Farsides, T., & Woodfield, R. (2003). Individual differences and undergraduate academic success: The roles of personality, intelligence, and application. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1225-1243.
25.
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
26.
Gerbing, D. W., & Hamilton, J. G. (1996). Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 62-72.
27.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
28.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 532-560.
29.
Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. (1970). Rating scales and information recovery—How many scales and response categories to use?Journal of Marketing, 34, 33-39.
30.
Gullone, E., & Moore, S. (2000). Adolescent risk-taking and the five factor model of personality. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 393-407.
31.
Guthrie, J. P., Ash, R. A., & Stevens, C. D. (2003). Are women “better” than men? Personality differences and expatriate selection. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18, 229-243.
32.
Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99-136.
33.
Hezlett, S., Kuncel, N., Vey, A., Ahart, A., Ones, D., Campbell, J., et al. (2001, March). The effectiveness of the SAT in predicting success early and late in college: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, Seattle, WA.
34.
Hong, E., & Milgram, R. M. (1999). Preferred and actual homework style: A cross-cultural examination. Educational Research, 41, 251-265.
35.
Hough, L. M. (1992). The Big Five personality variables-construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
36.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
37.
Hunter, J. E.,& Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
39.
John, O. P. (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
40.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.30 and PRELIS 2.30. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
41.
Judge, T. A.,& Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationshipofcoreself-evaluationstraits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80-92.
42.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693-710.
43.
Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635-694.
44.
Malloch, D. C., & Michael, W. B. (1981). Predicting student grade point average at a community college from scholastic aptitude tests and from measures representing three constructs in Vroom’s expectancy theory model of motivation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1127-1135.
45.
Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert-scale items? Effects on testing time and scale properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 506-509.
46.
McCelland, D. C. (1980). Motive dispositions: The merit of operant and respondent measures. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 10-41.
47.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel & Human Resources Management, 13, 153-200.
48.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.
Okun, M. A., & Finch, J. F. (1998). The big-five personality dimensions and the process of institutional departure. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 233-256.
50.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Paris, France: Author.
51.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52.
Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Five predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 78-90.
53.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation-enhancing environments (Vol. 6, pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
54.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
55.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
56.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
57.
Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 51-67.
58.
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288.
59.
Saldago, J. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
60.
Saldago, J. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 10, 117-125.
61.
SAS Institute. (1999). The SAS system for Windows. Cary, NC: Author.
62.
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Pearlman, K., & Hirsh, H. R. (1985). Forty questions about validity generalization and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38, 697-798.
63.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). Self-regulation and learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 7: Educational psychology (pp. 59-78). New York: John Wiley.
64.
Slotte, V., Lonka, K., & Lindblom-Ylaenne, S. (2001). Study-strategy use in learning from text. Does gender make any difference?Instructional Science, 29, 255-272.
65.
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
66.
Thompson, B., & Daniel, L. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197-208.
67.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125.
68.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the cause and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
70.
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48, 865-885.
71.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.
72.
Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.
73.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
74.
Wolfe, R. N., & Johnson, S. D. (1995). Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 177-185.
75.
Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On chi-square difference and z tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737-757.
76.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key subprocesses?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307-313.
77.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
78.
Zwick, R. (1987). Assessing the dimensionality of NAEP reading data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 293-308.
