Dropping Out: Another Side of the Story

Abstract

Dropping out of school is a national problem. Reducing the number of students who do so is a national goal. This study examines the school perspective of a set of families whose children dropped out. Working from audiotape-recorded interviews with 3or more members of 12families, the researchers describe a perspective that included a jaundiced view of education, a hostile view toward schooling, and a history of poor school performance at least two generations old. The families' children grew up fast, early on appropriating behaviors engaged in by older members. When they took these behaviors into school, they ran afoul of rules and regulations. For these families, school was a series of academic failures, conflicts with staff and peers, disciplinary hearings, suspensions, and expulsions. Dropping out was not a problem It was a solution.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Becker, H. S. , Geer, B. , & Hughes, E. (1968). Making the grade. New York: Wiley.

Cervantes, L F. (1965). The dropout: Causes and cures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Chute, C. (1985). The beans of Egypt, Maine. New York: Warer.

Clark, R. M. (1983). Family le and school achievement: Why poor Black children succeed or fail. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1988). The value of conformity: Leaning to stay in school.Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 19, 275.

Ekstrom, R. , Goertz, M. , Pollack, J. , & Rock, D. (1986). Who drops out of high school and why? Findings from a national study.Teachers College Record, 87, 356-373.

Employing the young. (1994, March 19-25). The Economist, p. 27.

Fine, M. (1986). Why urban adolescents drop into and out of public high school. In G. Natriello (Ed.), School dropouts. New York: Teachers' College Press.

Geertz, C. (1988). Works and lives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

10.

Gerics, J. , & Westheimer, M. (1988). Dropout prevention: Trinkets and gimmicks or Deweyan reconstruction.Teachers College Record, 90, 41-60.

11.

Glaser, B. , & Strauss, A. (1970). Theoretical sampling. In N. Densin (Ed.), Sociological methods (pp. 105-106). Chicago: Aldine.

12.

MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain't no makin'it. Boulder, CO: Westview.

13.

Murry, C. (1984). Losing ground. New York: Free Press.

14.

National Center for a l Staistics . (1993). The condition education, 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

15.

Parsons, T. (1955). The structure of social action. New York: Free Press.

16.

Rumbeger, R. W. , Ghatak, R. , Poulos, G. , & Ritter, P. L (1990). Family influences on dropout behavior in one California high school.Sociology of Education, 63, 283-299.

17.

Shibutani, T. (1967). Reference groups as perspectives. In J. 0. Manis & B. N. Meltzer (Eds.), Symbolic interaction (p. 161). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

18.

Stevenson, D. L. , & Baker, D. P. (1987). The family-school relation and the child's school performance.Child Development, 58, 134-135.

19.

Wehlage, G. , & Rutter, R. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem? Teachers College Record, 87, 374-392.

20.

Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. Hampshire, England: Gower.