Purpose: The purposes of this study were to: (a) meta-analyze the effects of academic press (AP) on K-12 student achievement in aggregate and in each examined learning subject; (b) meta-analyze the effect of school leadership of different leadership styles on AP; and (c) examine whether school level, subjects, and leadership or AP measures moderate these above-mentioned effects. Research Methods/Approach: Standard meta-analysis techniques were used to review 79 quantitative studies in the past 30 years and examine the multiple relationships between school leadership, AP, and student learning mentioned above. Heterogeneity analyses were conducted to identify moderators. Publication bias in these analysis results was also examined. Findings: AP had a large effect on student achievement; school leadership had a close to large effect on AP. These effects varied with leadership or AP measures and across school levels and student learning subjects. Implications for Research and Practice: The findings point to the importance of school leaders to improve student achievement by improving the level of AP in schools, especially high schools, and in schools with many economically disadvantaged students. Principals need to exercise a wide range of practices to push for academic excellence.
AhnS.AmesA. J.MyersN. D. (2012). A review of meta-analyses in education: Methodological strengths and weaknesses. Review of Educational Research, 82(4), 436–476. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312458162
AndersonK.KochanF.KenslerL. A.ReamesE. H. (2018). Academic optimism, enabling structures, and student achievement: Delving into relationships. Journal of School Leadership, 28(4), 434–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461802800401
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press.
6.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the MLQ. Mind Garden.
7.
BeardK. S.HoyW. K.HoyA. W. (2010). Academic optimism of individual teachers: Confirming a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1136–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.003
8.
BeretvasS. N. (2010). Meta-analysis. In PastorD. A. (Ed.), Quantitative methods in the social and behavioral sciences: A guide for researchers and reviewers (pp. 255–263). Routledge.
9.
BevelR. K.MitchellR. M. (2012). The effects of academic optimism on elementary Reading achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(6), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211264685
10.
BoothA.PapaioannouD.SuttonA. (2012). Systematic approaches to successful literature review. Sage.
11.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis). Wiley.
12.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.
13.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.LuppsecuS.EastonJ. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
14.
CarterE. C.SchönbrodtF. D.GervaisW. M.HilgardJ. (2019). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847196
15.
CicoliniG.ComparciniD.SimonettiV. (2014). Workplace empowerment and nurses’ job satisfaction: A systematic literature review. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(7), 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12028
16.
ÇoğaltayN.BozA. (2023). Influence of school leadership on collective teacher efficacy: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(3), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09754-9
17.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
18.
CooperH. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Sage.
19.
Darling-HammondL.AncessJ.OrtS. (2002). Reinventing high school: Outcomes of the coalition campus schools project. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 639–673. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039003639
20.
DayC.SammonsP.GorgenK. (2020). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust, Reading, England.
21.
DipaolaM. F.HoyW. K. (2005). School characteristics that foster organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of School Leadership, 15(4), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460501500402
22.
DuffM.BowersA. J. (2022). Identifying a typology of New York City schools through teacher perceptions of organizational capacity: A latent class analysis. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(4), 791–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1854789
23.
EdmondsR. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–27.
24.
EPPI (2021). EPPI publications. Available at Publications (ioe.ac.uk).
25.
Forsyth, P. (2018). “What Theory is Not” Revisited. Journal of Research on Organization in Education, 2, v-x.
26.
FoxJ. A.TracyP. E. (Eds.) (1986). Randomized response: A method for sensitive surveys. Sage.
GoddardR. D.HoyW. K.HoyA. W. (2000a). Collective teacher efficacy: It’s meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037002479
29.
GoddardR. D.SalloumS. J.BerebitskyD. (2009). Trust as a mediator of the relationships between poverty, racial composition, and academic achievement: Evidence from Michigan’s public elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08330503
30.
GoddardR. D.SweetlandS. R.HoyW. K. (2000b). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610021969164
31.
GrahamS.HebertM. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on Reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 710–744. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
32.
GronnP. (2002). Distributed leadership. In LeithwoodK., et al. (Ed.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653–696). Kluwer.
33.
GümüşS.ArarK.OplatkaI. (2021). Review of international research on school leadership for social justice, equity and diversity. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 53(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2020.1862767
34.
HallingerP. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244793
35.
HallingerP. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311304670
36.
HallingerP.ChenC.-W. (2013). Assessing the measurement properties of the principal instructional management rating scale a meta-analysis of reliability studies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 272–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12468149
37.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203
38.
HallingerP.KovačevićJ. (2021). Science mapping the knowledge base in educational leadership and management: A longitudinal bibliometric analysis, 1960 to 2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219859002
39.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
HayesD.ChristieP.MillsM.LingardB. (2004). Productive leaders and productive leadership: Schools as learning organisations. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(5), 520–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230410554043
42.
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2014). Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership and teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 653–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0097
43.
HigginsJ.ThomasJ. (2022). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Core methods section). Wiley.
44.
HittD. H.TuckerP. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315614911
45.
HoenigJ. M.HeiseyD. M. (2001). The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. The American Statistician, 55(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001300339897
46.
HolzbergerD.Schiepe-TiskaA. (2021). Is the school context associated with instructional quality? The effects of social composition, leadership, teacher collaboration, and school climate. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1913190
47.
HongF. Y. (2017). Antecedent and consequence of school academic optimism and teachers’ academic optimism model. Educational Studies, 43(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1248902
48.
HoyW.FeldmanJ. (1987). Organizational health: The concept and its measure. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(4), 30–38.
49.
HoyW. K.BarnesK.SaboD. (1995). The organizational health of middle schools: The concept and its measure. (Unpublished working paper).
50.
HoyW. K.HannumJ.Tschannen-MoranM. (1998). Organizational climate and student achievement: A parsimonious and longitudinal view. Journal of School Leadership, 8(4), 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268469800800401
51.
HoyW. K.SaboD. J. (1998). Quality middle schools: Open and healthy. Corwin Press.
52.
HoyW. K.SmithP. A.SweetlandS. R. (2002). The development of the organizational climate index for high schools: Its measure and relationship to faculty trust. High School Journal, 86(2), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2002.0023
53.
HoyW. K.TarterC. J. (1997). The road to open and healthy schools: A handbook for change. Elementary Edition, Corwin Press.
54.
HoyW. K.TarterC. J. (2011). Positive psychology and educational administration: An optimistic research agenda. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10396930
55.
HoyW. K.TarterC. J.BlissJ. (1990). Organization climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X90026003004
56.
HoyW. K.TarterC. J.HoyA. W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003425
57.
HoyW. K.TarterC. J.KottkampR. B. (1991). Open schools, healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Sage.
58.
HulpiaH.DevosG.RosseelY. (2009a). Development and validation of scores on the distributed leadership inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(6), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409344490
59.
HulpiaH.DevosG.Van KeerH. (2009b). The influence of distributed leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903231201
60.
HunterJ. E.GerbingD. W.BosterF. J. (1982). Machiavellian beliefs and personality: Construct invalidity of the machiavellianism dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1293–1305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1293
61.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Sage.
62.
JangH.ReardonS. F. (2019). States as sites of educational (in)equality: State contexts and the socioeconomic status achievement gradient. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419872459
KhalifaM. A.GoodenM. A.DavisJ. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383
65.
KimS. W.ChoH.KimL. Y. (2019). Socioeconomic status and academic outcomes in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(6), 875–916. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877155
66.
KirbyM. M.DiPaolaM. F. (2011). Academic optimism and community engagement in urban schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 542–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111159539
67.
KorkmazM. (2006). The relationship between organizational health and robust school vision in elementary schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 30(1), 14–36.
68.
KorkmazM. (2007). The effects of leadership styles on organizational health. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 13(49), 57–91.
69.
KulophasD.HallingerP. (2020). Leadership that matters: Creating cultures of academic optimism that support teacher learning in Thailand. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2019-0222
70.
LeeV. E.BrykA. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62(3), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112866
71.
LeeV. E.SmithJ. B.PerryT. E.SmylieM. A. (1999). Social support, academic press, and student achievement: A view from the middle grades in Chicago. Improving Chicago’s schools. A report of the Chicago Annenberg Research Project. Consortium on Chicago School Research.
LeithwoodK.DayC. (2007). Starting with what we know. In DayC.LeithwoodK. (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change (pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5516-1_1.
74.
LeithwoodK.DayC.SammonsP.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2006a). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. National College for School Leadership.
75.
LeithwoodK.DukeD. (1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In MurphyJ.LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 45–72). Jossey-Bass.
76.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320064
77.
LeithwoodK.LouisK. S. (2012). Linking leadership to learning. Jossey-Bass.
78.
LeithwoodK.LouisK. S.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of the evidence linking leadership to student learning. Wallace Foundation.
79.
LeithwoodK.MascallB.StraussT.SacksR.MemonN.YashkinaA. (2006b). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter. Leadership and Policy, 6(1), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601091267
80.
LeithwoodK.PattenS.JantziD. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10377347
81.
LeithwoodK.Seashore-LouisK. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. Jossey-Bass.
82.
LeithwoodK.SunJ.-P. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268
83.
LeithwoodK.SunJ.-P. (2018). Academic culture: A promising mediator of school leaders’ influence on student learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(3), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2017-0009
84.
LeithwoodK.SunJ.-P.SchumackerR. (2020). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “the four paths model”. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 570–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19878772
85.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
86.
LiuS.HallingerP.FengD. (2016). Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: Does trust matter?Journal of Educational Administration, 54(6), 661–682. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2016-0015
87.
MaX.KlingerD. (2000). Hierarchical linear modelling of student and school effects on academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1585867
88.
MarzanoR. J.WatersT.McNultyB. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. ASCD and McREL.
89.
MascallB.LeithwoodK.StraussT.SacksR. (2009). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. In HarrisA. (Ed.), Distributed leadership. Springer.
90.
McGuiganL.HoyW. K. (2006). Principal leadership: Creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(3), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760600805816
91.
MitchellR. M.KenslerL. A.Tschannen-MoranM. (2015). Examining the effects of instructional leadership on school academic press and student achievement. Journal of School Leadership, 25(2), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500202
92.
MitchellR. M.TarterC. J. (2016). A path analysis of the effects of principal professional orientation towards leadership, professional teacher behavior, and school academic optimism on school Reading achievement. Societies, 6(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6010005
93.
MulfordB.SilinsH. (2003). Leadership for organizational learning and improved student outcomes—what do we know. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640302041
94.
MurphyJ. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. In LottoL. S.ThurstonP. W. (Eds.), Advances in educational administration: Changing perspectives on the school (Vol. 1, pp. 163–200). JAI Press.
95.
MurphyJ. (2016). Creating instructional capacity: A framework for creating academic press. Corwin.
96.
MurphyJ. (2023). Understanding communities of school leadership: Changing dynamics of organizations. Springer.
97.
MurphyJ.ElliotS. N.GoldringE.PorterA. C. (2006). Learning-centered leadership: A conceptual foundation. Wallace Foundation.
98.
MurphyJ.TorreD. (2014). Creating productive cultures in schools for students, teachers, and parents. Corwin.
99.
MurphyJ.WeilM.HallingerP.MitmanA. (1982). Academic press: Translating high expectations into school polices and classroom practices, Educational Leadership, 40, 22–26.
100.
MurphyJ. F. (1982). Academic press: Translating high expectations into school policies and classroom practices. Educational Leadership, 40(3), 22–26.
101.
NewmanM.GoughD. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. In Zawacki-RichterO.KerresM.BedenlierS.BondM.,, & BuntinsK. (Eds.), Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application (pp. 1–22). Springer.
102.
O'HaraC. M. (2019). The relationship between teachers’ perceptions of transformational leadership and teacher academic optimism, and the influence of inclusion of students with disabilities in elementary schools (Order No. 13856936) [Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University]. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2268338021). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/relationship-between-teachers-perceptions/docview/2268338021/se-2
103.
OvertonR. C. (1998). A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator variable effects. Psychological Methods, 3(3), 354–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.3.3.354
104.
ParishJ. B. (2002). School climate and state standards: A study of the relationships between middle school organizational climate and student achievement on the Virginia Standards of Learning Tests (Order No. 3041368) [Doctoral dissertation, The College of William and Mary in Virginia]. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (276127699). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/school-climate-state-standards-study/docview/276127699/se-2
105.
ParlarH.CansoyR. (2017). Examining the relationship between instructional leadership and organizational health. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(4), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i4.2195
106.
PhilipsM. (1997). What makes schools effective? A comparison of the relationships of communitarian climate and academic climate to mathematics achievement and attendance drying middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034004633
107.
PigottT. D.PolaninJ. R. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
108.
PiyamanP.HallingerP.ViseshsiriP. (2017). Addressing the achievement gap: Exploring principal leadership and teacher professional learning in urban and rural primary schools in Thailand. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(6), 717–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2016-0142
109.
RethlefsenM. L.KirtleyS.WaffenschmidtS.AyalaA. P.MoherD.PageM. J.KoffelJ. B.; PRISMA-S Group. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
RileyR. D.LambertP. C.Abo-ZaidG. (2010). Meta-analysis of individual participant data: Rationale, conduct, and reporting. British Medical Journal, 340, c221. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c221
112.
RobinsonV. M.HohepaM.LloydC. (2007). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Australian Council for Educational Leaders, 41, 1–27. Available at: BES Leadership Cvr.indd (educationcounts.govt.nz).
RosenthalR. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (revised ed.). Sage.
115.
RosenthalR.DiMatteoM. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review Psychology, 52(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59
SaboD. J.BarnesK.HoyW. K. (1996). Organizational health and decision participation: An empirical analysis of healthy interpersonal dynamics and teacher participation. Journal of School Leadership, 6(6), 576–599. https://doi-org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/10.1177/105268469600600601
119.
Sarkis-OnofreR.Catalá-LópezF.AromatarisE.LockwoodC. (2021). How to properly use the PRISMA statement. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01671-z
120.
ScammaccaN.RobertsG.StuebingK. K. (2014). Meta-analysis with complex research designs: Dealing with dependence from multiple measures and multiple group comparisons. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 328–364. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313500826
121.
SchleicherA. (2015). Helping immigrant students to succeed at school and beyond. Available at: Helping-immigrant-students-to-succeed-at-school-and-beyond.pdf (oecd.org).
122.
SeligmanM. E. P. (2002). La auténtica felicidad [Authentic happiness]. Ediciones B.
123.
ShouseR. (1996). Academic press and sense of community: Conflict, congruence, and implications for student achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 1(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333405
124.
SlavinR. E. (1995). Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)00097-A
125.
SmithP. A.EscobedoP.KearneyW. S. (2020). Principal influence: A catalyst for positive school climate. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 16(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2020v16n5a961
126.
SmithP. A.HoyW. K. (2007). Academic optimism and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(5), 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230710778196
127.
SpillaneJ. (2017). Leadership and learning: Conceptualizing relations between school administrative practice and instructional practice. In LeithwoodK.SunJ. P.,, & PollockK. (Eds.), How school leaders contribute to student success: The four paths framework (pp. 49–67). Springer.
128.
SpillaneJ. P.HalversonR.DiamondJ. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
129.
StringfieldS.TeddlieC. (1991). Schools as affecters of teacher effects. In WalbergH.WaxmanH. (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 161–180). McCutchan Publishing.
130.
SunJ.-P.LeithwoodK. (2017). Calculating the power of alternative choices by school leaders for improving student achievement. School Leadership and Management, 37(1–2), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1293635
131.
SunJ.-P.ZhangR.ForsythP. (2023). The effects of teacher trust on student learning and the malleability of teacher trust to school leadership: A 35 year meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, Published online first athttps://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X231183662
132.
TanC. Y.GaoL.ShiM. (2022). Second-order meta-analysis synthesizing the evidence on associations between school leadership and different school outcomes. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220935456
133.
ThienL. M.AdamsD.KohH. M. (2021). Nexus between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and teacher organisational commitment: A structural equation modelling analysis. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2020-0278
134.
ThienL. M.ChanS. Y. (2022). One-size-fits-all? A cross-validation study of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220926506
135.
Tschannen-MoranM.BankoleR. A.MitchellR. M.MooreD. M. (2012). Student academic optimism: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 150–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311304689
136.
Tschannen-MoranM.DiPaolaM. (2002). Development of school climate index. Manuscript in preparation, College of William and Mary.
137.
Tschannen-MoranM.GareisC. R. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2014-0024
138.
Tschannen-MoranM.GareisC. R. (2017). Principals, trust, and cultivating vibrant schools. In LeithwoodK.SunJ.,, & PollockK. (Eds.), How school leaders contribute to student success (pp. 153–174). Springer.
139.
Tschannen-MoranM.ParishJ.DipaolaM. (2006). School climate: The interplay between interpersonal relationships and student achievement. Journal of School Leadership, 16(4), 386–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460601600402
140.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). No child left behind act of 2001. http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/
141.
U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every student succeeds act. https://www.ed.gov/essa?src=rn
142.
VelardeJ. M.GhaniM. F.AdamsD.CheahJ. H. (2022). Towards a healthy school climate: The mediating effect of transformational leadership on cultural intelligence and organisational health. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 163–184. https://doi-org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/10.1177/1741143220937311
WeberJ. (1996). Leading the instructional program. In SmithS.PieleP. (Eds.), School leadership (pp. 253–278). Clearinghouse of Educational Management.
145.
WilsonD. B. (2009). Meta-analysis stuff. http://mason.gmu.edu/∼dwilsonb/ma.html
146.
WolfF. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. In FoxJ. A.TracyP. E. (Eds.), Randomized response: A method for sensitive surveys (pp. 9–65). Sage.
147.
XiaoY.WatsonM. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
