The Impact of Personal and Program Characteristics on the Placement of School Leadership Preparation Program Graduates in School Leader Positions

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of personal and program characteristics on the placement of graduates of principal preparation programs in assistant principal, principal, and school leadership positions. Research Design: This study relies on Texas principal production data from 1993 through 2007 matched to employment data from 1993 through 2013. The data include personal characteristics of each program’s graduates (age, sex, and race/ethnicity), program characteristics (program type, percentages of female graduates, and percentage of White graduates), labor market location, and certification year. We employ both descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression analysis to examine the factors associated with obtaining employment as an assistant principal, principal, and school leader. Findings: At least 50% of graduates obtained placement as a school leader within 5 years and about 70% did so over 10 years. Within 5 years of certification, men, Latinos, and middle-aged graduates had greater odds of employment as a school leader than women, Whites, and younger and older graduates, respectively. Differences arose, however, when examining placement as an assistant principal and principal separately. In particular, Black and Latina/o graduates had greater odds of employment as an assistant principal but had lower odds of employment as a principal than their White peers. Finally, there were few program characteristics associated with placement, and differences between programs explained very little of the variation in placement rates, bringing into question efforts to hold programs accountable for such outcomes.

Keywords

principal preparation programs principal preparation program outcomes placement rates of principals employment rates of newly certified principals

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anthes

(2004). Administrator license requirements, portability, waivers, and alternative certification. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

Baker

B. D.

Cooper

B. S.

(2005). Do principals with stronger academic backgrounds hire better teachers? Policy implications for improving high-poverty schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 449-479.

Bastian

K. C.

Henry

G. T.

(2014). The apprentice pathways to the principalship and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51, 600-639.

Bathon

Black

(2011). Where do our graduates go? A five-year exploration of the regional distribution of principal preparation program graduates. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(1). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ972872

Black

Bathon

Poindexter

(2007). Looking in the mirror to improve practice: A study of administrative licensure and masters’ degree programs in the state of Indiana (Report prepared under state grant from The Wallace Foundation). Indianapolis: University of Indiana.

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2013). Analyzing the determinants of the matching of public school teachers to jobs: Disentangling the preferences of teachers and employers. Journal of Labor Economics, 31, 83-117. doi:10.1086/666725

Briggs

Cheney

Davis

Moll

(2013). Operating in the dark: What outdated state policies and data gaps mean for effective school leadership. Dallas, TX: George W. Bush Institute.

Browne-Ferrigno

(2003). Becoming a principal: Role conception, initial socialization, role-identity transformation, purposeful engagement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 468-503. doi:10.1177/0013161x03255561

Campbell

Gross

(2012). Principal concerns: Leadership data and strategies for states. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.

10.

Crawford

E. R.

Fuller

E. J.

(2015). A dream attained or deferred? Examination of production and placement of Latino administrators. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085915602537

11.

DeAngelis

K. J.

O’Connor

N. K.

(2012). Examining the pipeline into educational administration: An analysis of applications and job offers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 468-505. doi:10.1177/0013161x11436269

12.

Feuer

M. J.

Floden

R. E.

Chudowsky

Ahn

(2013). Evaluation of teacher preparation programs: Purposes, methods, and policy options. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.

13.

Fuller

E. J.

Hollingworth

(2014a). A bridge too far? Challenges in evaluating principal effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 466-499. doi:10.1177/0013161x13506595

14.

Fuller

E. J.

Hollingworth

(2014b). Evaluating principal-preparation programs based on placement rates: Problems and prospects for policymakers. Journal of Research on Leadership Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1942775114559029

15.

Fuller

E. J.

Hollingworth

(2014c). Examining the placement of principal preparation program candidates into education positions: A twenty year analysis. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.

16.

Fuller

E. J.

O’Doherty

Reynolds

(in press). Recruitment, selection, and placement of educational leadership students. In Crow

Young

M. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders. New York, NY: Routledge.

17.

Fuller

E. J.

Young

M. D.

(2009). Tenure and retention of newly hired principals in Texas. Austin: University Council for Educational Administration, Department of Educational Administration, University of Texas at Austin.

18.

Fuller

E. J.

Young

M. D.

Baker

(2011, Spring). Do principal preparation programs influence student achievement through the building of teacher-team qualifications by the principal? An exploratory analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 173-216.

19.

Glassick

C. E.

Huber

M. T.

Maeroff

G. I.

Boyer

(1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

20.

Harris

Arnold

Lowery

Crocker

(2000). Deciding to become a principal: What factors motivate or inhibit that decision? ERS Spectrum, 18(2), 40-45.

21.

Heck

R. H.

Thomas

Tabata

L. N.

(2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

22.

Hess

F. M.

Kelly

A. P.

(2005). An innovative look, a recalcitrant reality: The politics of principal preparation reform. Educational Policy, 19, 155-180. doi:10.1177/0895904804270776

23.

Jackson

B. L.

Kelley

(2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 192-212.

24.

Joy

(1998). Why are women underrepresented in public school administration? An empirical test of promotion discrimination. Economics of Education Review, 17, 193-204.

25.

Kumashiro

K. K.

(2015). Review of proposed 2015 Federal Teacher Preparation Regulations. Retrieved from http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Think_Twice/TT_Kumashiro_TeacherPrep.pdf

26.

Lankford

R. H.

O’Connell

Wyckoff

(2003). Identifying the next generation of school leaders. Albany: Center for Policy Research, University at Albany, SUNY.

27.

Lankford

R. H.

Wyckoff

(2003). The supply of school leaders: A multivariate analysis of administrative certification and transitions to leadership positions. Albany, NY: University of Albany.

28.

Levine

(2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.

29.

New Leaders. (2013). Change agents: How states can develop effective school leaders (Concept paper). Retrieved from http://www.newleaders.org/wp-content/uploads/PreparationLicensureConceptPaper.pdf

30.

Orr

M. T.

(2010). Pipeline to preparation to advancement: Graduates’ experiences in, through, and beyond leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 114-172. doi:10.1177/0011000010378612.

31.

Orr

M. T.

Fuller

E. J.

(2009). Explaining who becomes a principal: A comparison of new teachers’ attributes and advancement in their first 10 years. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

32.

Papa

F. C.

Jr. Lankford

Wyckoff

(2002). The attributes and career paths of principals: Implications for improving policy. Stanford, CA: Center for Education Policy Analysis.

33.

Pounder

D. G.

Merrill

R. J.

(2001). Job desirability of the high school principalship: A job choice theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 27-57.

34.

Riehl

Byrd

M. A.

(1997). Gender differences among new recruits to school administration: Cautionary footnotes to an optimistic tale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 45-64.

35.

Samuelson

P. A.

Nordhaus

W. D.

(1992). Economics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

36.

Shelton

S. V.

(2009). Strong leaders, strong schools: 2008 State laws. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures.

37.

University Council for Educational Administration, & New Leaders. (2015). Framework for evaluating state principal preparation programs. New York, NY: New Leaders.