Purpose: Instructional coaching is framed as both a means for systemic and individual reform. These competing conceptualizations of coaching as a mechanism for change have not been systematically examined, and therefore, we know little about how the framing of instructional coaching initiatives affects the enactment of coaching. In response to this gap in the literature, we examined one district’s efforts to use literacy coaching as a means to facilitate system-wide changes in literacy practice. Our investigation asks: How does the framing of coaching as a lever for systemic and/or individual reform influence the enactment of literacy coaching? Research Methods: Qualitative data were collected from four literacy coaches in one district including time allocation logs, interviews (n = 32), recorded discussions, and written documentation. Additional data related to the coaches’ training program included observations of 22 training sessions, interviews with the program leaders (n = 7) and regional district leader (n = 3), and survey data from training participants. Findings: Although the coaches in this study aimed to support system-wide changes in literacy practice, the training they received framed coaching as a means to support individual learning. In turn, the change strategies that the coaches employed mirrored this theory of change and focused on being responsive to individual teachers’ particular needs, often at the expense of school and district goals. Thus, the findings from this research suggest that the framing of coach roles may influence enactment in consequential ways and raise questions about how coaching can be framed to support both individual and systemic reform. Implications: The findings from this research have implications for the framing of coach roles, the skills and knowledge needed for coaching, and the kinds of professional learning opportunities available to coaches.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-407.
2.
BeanR. M.CarrollK. E. (2006). The literacy coach as a catalyst for change. In CumminsC. (Ed.), Understanding and implementing Reading First initiatives: The changing role of administrators (pp. 139-152). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3.
BeanR. M.DraperJ. A.HallV.VandermolenJ.ZigmondN. (2010). Coaches and coaching in Reading First schools. Elementary School Journal, 111, 87-114.
4.
BiancarosaG.BrykA. S.DexterE. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal, 111, 7-34.
5.
BlameyK.MeyerC.WalpoleS. (2009). Middle and high school literacy coaches: A national survey. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 310-323.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
BorkoH. S.WolfS. A.SimoneG.UchiyamaK. P. (2003). Schools in transition: Reform efforts and school capacity in Washington State. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 171-201.
9.
BossertS. T.DwyerD. C.RowanB.LeeG. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34-64.
10.
Bradley-LevineJ. (2011). Using case study to examine teacher leader development. Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research, 5, 246-267.
11.
Bradley-LevineJ. (2012). Developing critical consciousness through teacher leader preparation. Journal of School Leadership, 22, 751-770.
12.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.LuppescuS.EastonJ. Q. (2010) Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
BukowieckiE. (2012). The literacy coach: Preparation, practice and reflection. In StrongM. W.JayA. B. (Eds.), Promoting quality assurance in literacy instruction: The preparation, inquiries and practices of literacy professionals (pp. 24-33). Philadelphia, PA: New Foundations.
15.
CamburnE.RowanB.TaylorJ. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 347-373.
16.
CampbellP. D.MalkusN. N. (2011). The impact of elementary mathematics coaches on student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 111, 430-454.
17.
CantrellS. C.HughesH. K. (2008). Teacher efficacy and content literacy implementation: An exploration of the effects of extended professional development with coaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 95-127.
18.
ChvalK. B.ArbaughF.LanninJ. K.van GarderenD.CummingsL.EstapaA. T.HueyM. E. (2010). The transition from experienced teacher to mathematics coach: Establishing a new identity. Elementary School Journal, 111, 191-216.
19.
CobbP.JacksonK. (2011). Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 6-33.
20.
CoburnC. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 145-170.
21.
CoburnC. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3-12.
22.
CoburnC. E.RussellJ. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 203-235.
23.
CoburnC. E.WoulfinS. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5-30.
24.
CohenD. K. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform?Educational Researcher, 24(9), 11-17, 31.
25.
CohenD. K.HillH. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
CostaA. L.GarmstonR. J. (1994). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
27.
CrowtherF.KaaganS. S.FergusonM.HannL. (2002). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
28.
DatnowA.CastellanoM. E. (2001). Managing and guiding school reform: Leadership in success for all schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 219-249.
29.
DatnowA.HubbardL.MehanH. (2002). Extending educational reform: From one school to many. London, England: Routledge/Falmer.
30.
DeussenT.CoskieT.RobinsonL.AutioE. (2007). “Coach” can mean many things: Five categories of literacy coaches in Reading First (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No.005). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
31.
Elish-PiperL.L’AllierS. K. (2011). Examining the relationship between literacy coaches and student reading gains in grades K-3. Elementary School Journal, 112, 83-106.
32.
ElmoreR. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
33.
ElmoreR. F. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
34.
ElmoreR. F.BurneyD. (1997). School variation and systemic instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City. Pittsburgh, PA: High Performance Learning Communities Project.
35.
EvertsonC. M.GreenJ. L. (1986). Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
36.
FirestoneW. A.ManginM. M.MartinezM. C.PolovskyT. (2005). Leading coherent professional development: A comparison of three districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 413-448.
37.
FishmanB. J.MarxR. W.BestS.TalR. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643-658.
38.
FuhrmanS. H. (1993). The politics of coherence. In FuhrmanS. H. (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 1-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
FullanM. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
40.
GallucciC.Van LareM. D.YoonI.BoatrightB. (2010). Instructional coaching: Building theory about the role and organizational support for professional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 919-963.
41.
GamseB. C.JacobR. T.HorstM.BoulayB.UnluF. (2008). Exploring the relationship between literacy coaching and student reading achievement in grades K-1. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 162-174.
42.
GaretM. S.CronenS.EatonM.KurkiA.LudwigM.JonesW.. . .SztejnbergL. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement (NCEE Report No. 2008-4030). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Evaluation.
43.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
44.
GibsonS. (2006). Lesson observation and feedback: The practice of an expert reading coach. Reading Research and Instruction, 45, 295-318.
45.
GreenoJ. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5-17.
46.
GuskeyT. R.HubermanM. (1995). Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47.
HallingerP. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refused to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 221-239.
48.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contributions to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157-191.
49.
HarrisA. (2011). System improvement through collective capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 624-636.
50.
HartA. W. (1995). Reconceiving school leadership: Emergent views. Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 9-28.
51.
HatchT. (1998). The differences in theory that matter in the practice of school improvement. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 3-31.
52.
HawleyW. D.ValliL. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53.
HellerM. J.FirestoneW. A. (1995). Who’s in charge here? Sources of leadership for change in eight schools. Elementary School Journal, 96, 65-86.
54.
HonigM. I.HatchT. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16-30.
55.
HopenwasserC.LordK. (2012). Transforming future literacy specialists into literacy leaders. In StrongM. W.JayA. B. (Eds.), Promoting quality assurance in literacy instruction: The preparation, inquiries and practices of literacy professionals (pp. 9-18). Philadelphia, PA: New Foundations.
56.
HubbardL.MehanH.SteinM. K. (2006). Reform as learning: School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
International Reading Association. (2004). The role and qualifications of the reading coach in the United States (A position statement of the International Reading Association). Newark, DE: Author.
58.
IppolitoJ. (2010). Three ways that literacy coaches balance responsive and directive relationships with teachers. Elementary School Journal, 3, 164-190.
59.
JoyceB.ShowersB. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal. White Plains, NY: Longman.
60.
KillionJ.HarrisonC. (2006). Taking the lead: New roles for teachers and school-based coaches. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
61.
KingB. M.NewmannF. M. (2001). Building school capacity through professional development: Conceptual and empirical consideration. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 86-93.
62.
KnightJ. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
63.
KnightJ. (2009). Coaching: The key to translating research into practice lies in continuous job-embedded learning with ongoing support. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 18-22.
64.
KruseS. D.ZimmermanB. (2012). Can literacy coaching provide a model for school-wide professional learning?Educational Research Journal, 2, 279-291.
LeithwoodK.LouisK. S.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning from Leadership Project. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
67.
LeithwoodK.RiehlC. (2005). What do we already know about educational leadership? In FirestoneW. A.RiehlC. (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 12-27). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
68.
LiebermanA.MillerL. (2004). Teacher leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
69.
LordB.CressK.MillerB. (2003). Teacher leadership as classroom support: The challenges of scale and feedback in mathematics and science education reform. Newton, MA: Center for Leadership and Learning Communities, Education Development Center.
70.
LordB.CressK.MillerB. (2008). Teacher leadership in support of large-scale mathematics and science education reform. In ManginM. M.StoelingaS. R. (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 55-76). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
71.
Loucks-HorsleyS.HewsonP. W.LoveN.StilesK. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
72.
ManginM. M. (2007). The role of elementary principals in teacher leadership initiatives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 319-357.
73.
ManginM. M. (2009). Literacy coach role implementation: How district context influences reform efforts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 759-792.
74.
ManginM. M.DunsmoreK. L. (2013). Conflicting storylines in teacher leadership: How one literacy coach struggled to position herself and her work. The New Educator, 9, 226-249.
75.
ManginM. M.StoelingaS. R. (Eds.). (2008). Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
76.
ManginM. M.StoelingaS. R. (Eds.). (2011). Peer? Expert? Teacher leaders struggle to gain trust while establishing their expertise. Journal of Staff Development, 32, 48-51.
77.
MarksH. M.PrintyS. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 370-397.
78.
MarshJ.McCombsJ.LockwoodJ.MartorellF.GershwinD.NaftelS.. . . CregoA. I. (2008). Supporting literacy across the sunshine state: A study of Florida Middle School Reading Coaches. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
79.
MatsumuraL. C.SartorisM.BickelD. D.GarnierH. E. (2009). Leadership for literacy coaching: The principal’s role in launching a new coaching program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 655-693.
80.
MayH.SupovitzJ. A. (2006). Capturing the cumulative effects of school reform: An 11-year study of the impacts of America’s Choice on student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 231-257.
81.
MayH.SupovitzJ. A. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 332-352.
82.
McDonnellL. M.ElmoreR. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133-152.
83.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
84.
MoranM. C. (2007). Differentiated literacy coaching: Scaffolding for student and teacher success. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
85.
MurphyJ. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
86.
NeufeldB.RoperD. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity. Cambridge, MA: Education Matters.
87.
NeumanS.CunninghamL. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Journal of Education, 46, 532-566.
88.
NeumerskiC. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership and where should we go from here?Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 310-347.
89.
NewmannF. M.KingM. B.YoungsP. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108, 259-299.
90.
NewmannF. M.SmithB.AllensworthE.BrykA. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 297-321.
91.
OgawaR. T.BossertS. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 224-243.
92.
PaxtonM.SlatteryC.BaynumL. (2012). Purposeful prompting: Preparing the literacy coach. In StrongM. W.JayA. B. (Eds.), Promoting quality assurance in literacy instruction: The preparation, inquiries and practices of literacy professionals (pp. 9-18). Philadelphia, PA: New Foundations.
93.
PoglincoS. M.BachA. J. (2004). The heart of the matter: Coaching as a vehicle for professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 398-400.
94.
PutnamR. T.BorkoH. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
95.
RainvilleK. N.JonesS. (2008). Situated identities: Power and positioning in the work of a literacy coach. Reading Teacher, 61, 440-448.
96.
RollerC. M. (2006). Reading and literacy coaches report on hiring requirements and duties survey. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
97.
RosenholtzS. J. (1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Educational Research Journal, 93, 352-388.
98.
SchneiderA.IngramH. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of Politics, 55, 510-529.
99.
ShanklinN. (2006, September). What are the characteristics of effective literacy coaching?Literacy Coaching Clearinghouse, 1-3.
100.
ShawM. L.SmithW. E.CheslerB. J.RomeoL. (2005, June/July). Moving forward: The reading specialist as literacy coach. Reading Today, 22(6), 6.
101.
ShulmanL. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
102.
SmithM. S.O’DayJ. (1991). Systemic school reform. In FuhrmanS.MalenB. (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (Politics of Education Association Yearbook; pp. 233-267. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
103.
SmylieM. A.ConleyS.MarksH. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 101, 162-188.
104.
SpillaneJ. P.HalversonR.DiamondJ. B. (2004). Theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.
105.
StoelingaS. R. (2010). At the intersection of principal and teacher instructional leadership: The case of Donaldson Elementary. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 13(2), 21-28.
106.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
107.
SturtevantE. G. (2003). The literacy coach: A key to improving teaching and learning in secondary schools. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
108.
SunM.FrankK. A.PenuelW. R.KimC. M. (2013). How external institutions penetrate schools through formal and informal leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 610-644.
109.
SupovitzJ. A.SirinidesP.MayH. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 31-56.
110.
TaylorJ. E. (2008). Instructional coaching: The state of the art. In ManginM. M.StoelingaS. R. (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 10-35). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
111.
TimperleyH.Alton-LeeA. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. In KellyG.LukeA.GreenJ. (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 32, pp. 328-369). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
112.
TollC. A. (2005). The literacy coach’s survival guide: Essential questions and practical answers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
113.
TyackD.TobinW. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change?American Educational Research Journal, 31, 453-479.
114.
VanderburgM.StephensD. (2010). The impact of literacy coaches: What teachers value and how teachers change. Elementary School Journal, 111, 141-163.
115.
WalpoleS.McKennaM. C. (2004). The literacy coach’s handbook: A guide to research-based practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
116.
WatersT.MarzanoR. J.McNultyB. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
117.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
118.
YinR. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
119.
York-BarrJ.DukeK. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74, 255-316.
