Background: Despite access for women administrators in educational leadership departments, the longevity of their service within them is tenuous. Women administrators are caught in the social constructions of gender and leadership.
Purpose: To explore how some women administrators in educational leadership programs have sustained their administrative roles; to evaluate whether their resiliency rests on a feminine type of leadership.
Participants: A group of seven diverse women administrators in educational leadership programs who were peer nominated, are accomplished scholars, and have an average of 11.25 years of experience.
Research Design:A computer-based qualitative Delphi technique using an online asynchronous mode and ensuring anonymity.
Data Collection and Analysis:Several iterations focused on the identification of resiliency markers and components, descriptions of episodes denoting the participants' overcoming difficult situations, proposals for adapting educational leadership programs to foster better women leaders, and the reflection and interpretation of data.
Findings: The participants' rankings and narratives indicate that gender identity and leadership are more complex than to simply fit them into one gender construction model or another. When interacting in particular episodes, resilient women leaders embrace or disclaim one gender norm for another to varying degrees. A multidimensional-gendered leadership model is provided.
Conclusions: Faculty and students should not expect the socially constructed norms in women leaders. These resilient participants suggest that gendered leadership norms are too simplistic and that women leaders must be willing to shift into multidimensional gender and traverse conventional borders.
Aburdene, P., & Naisbitt, J. (1992). Megatrends. New York: Villard Books.
2.
American Council in Educational Corporation Database. (2002, March 28). Black Issues in Higher Education, 29-31.
3.
Anderson, N., Lievens, F., van Dam, K., & Born, M. (2006). A construct-driven investigation of gender differences in a leadership-role assessment center . Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 555-566.
4.
Anderson, S.J., & Johnson, J.T. (2003). The who and when of “gender-blind” attitudes: Predictors of gender-role egalitarianism in two different domains—Brief report. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 49(9—10), 527-532.
5.
Anzaldua, G. (1987). Borderlands: La frontera. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
6.
Arnold, M.L., & Shinew, K.J. (1998). The role of gender, race, and income on park use constraints. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration , 16, 39-56.
7.
Arnot, M. (2002). Reproducing gender? Essays on educational theory and feminist politics. London: Routledge/Falmer .
8.
Broverman, I.K., Broverman, D.M., Clarkson, F.E., Rosenkrantz, P., & Vogel, S.R. (1970). Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 34, 1-7.
9.
Broverman, I.K., Vogel, S.R., Broverman, D.M., Clarkson, F.E., & Rosenkrantz, P.S. (1972). Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78.
10.
Brunner, C. C. (Ed.). (1999). Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11.
Brunner, C.C. (2005). Women performing the superintendency: Problematizing the normative alignment of conceptions of power and constructions of gender . In J. Collard & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Leadership, gender and culture in education: Male and female perspectives (pp. 121-136). New York: Open University Press.
12.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
13.
Camden, C., & Witt, J. (1983). Manager communicative style and productivity: A study of female and male managers. International Journal of Women's Studies, 6, 258-269.
14.
Cardenas, S. (2006). An analysis of factors related to the academic career satisfaction of Hispanic women faculty in higher education: Implications for policy and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.
15.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2006). Lookup and listings. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/index.asp?key=807
16.
Chlinwiak, L. (1997). Higher educational leadership: Analyzing the gender gap. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
17.
Clark, M.C., Carafella, R.S., & Ingram, P.B. (1998). Leadership at the glass ceiling: Women's experience of mid-management roles. Initiatives,58(4), 59-70.
18.
Clark, V., Garner, S.N., Higonnet, M., & Katrak, K.H. (1996). Anti-feminism in the academy. New York: Routledge.
19.
Coleman, M. (2003). Gender in educational leadership. In M. Brundrett, N. Burton, & R. Smith (Eds.), Leadership in education (pp. 36-51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Cordova, F., Neely, R., & Shaughnessy, M.F. (1988). Mentoring women and minorities in higher education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED325005)
21.
Daubman, K.A., Heatherington, L., & Ahn, A. (1992). Gender and the self-presentation of academic achievement . Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 27(3/4), 87-204.
22.
Derber, C. (2000). The pursuit of attention: Power and ego in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., & Van Engen, M.L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing men and women . Psychological Bulletin,129, 569-591.
24.
Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., & Klonsky, B.G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin,111, 3-22.
25.
Frisby, W. (1992). Women in leisure service management: Alternative definitions of career success. Society and Leisure, 15(1), 155-174.
26.
Frisby, W., & Brown, B.A. (1991). The balancing act: Women leisure service managers . Journal of Applied Recreation Research,16(4), 297-321.
27.
Frye, M. (1980). On second thought . . . Radical Teacher, 17, 37-38.
28.
Getskow, V. (1996). Women in community college leadership roles. Los Angeles: ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges . (ERIC Document Reproduction Services ED400025)
29.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
31.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
32.
Goldberg, H. (2000). The hazards of being male: Surviving the myth of masculine privilege. Gretna, LA: WellnessInstitute.
33.
Grogan, M. (1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency . Albany: State University of New York Press.
34.
Grotberg, E.H. (2003). Resilience for today: Gaining strength from adversity . Westport, CT: Praeger.
35.
Gupton, S.L., & Slick, G.A. (1996). Highly successful women administrators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
36.
Hall, V. (1996). Dancing on the ceiling: A study of women managers in education. London: Chapman.
37.
Hall, V., Gronn, P., Jenkin, M., Power, S., & Reynolds, C. (1999). Review symposium. Educational Management & Administration, 27(1), 99-116.
38.
Hanafin, S. (2004). Review of literature on the Delphi technique. Retrieved February 27, 2005, from http://www.nco.ie/upload_documents/DelphiTechniqueALiteratureReview
39.
Hartsock, N. (1998). The feminist standpoint revisited and other essays . Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
40.
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique . Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008-1015.
41.
Hatala, R. (2003, March 4). Medical women in academia: Silenced by the system. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 168(5), 542-544.
42.
Herber, C. (2002). Women in academia: A review of women's status, barriers, and leadership issues. In S. A. Korcheck & M. Reese (Eds.), Women as school executives: Research and reflections on educational leadership (pp. 135-142). Austin, TX: Texas Council of Women School Executives.
43.
Holland, A. (2001, March). The campaign for women protectors: Gender, race and frontier between the wars. Australian Feminist Studies , 16(34), 27-42.
44.
Hudson, J., & Rea, D. (1998, Summer). Teachers'perceptions of women in the principalship: A current perspective. Retrieved May 22, 2005, from http://www.advancingwomencom/awl/summer98/HUD.html
45.
Indvik, J. (2001). Women and leadership. In P. G. Northouse (Ed.), Leadership and practice (3rd ed., pp. 204-225). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Janas, M. (2002). Twenty ways to build resiliency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38(2), 117.
47.
Kawakami, C., White, J.B., & Langer, E.J. (2000). Mindful and masculine: Freeing women leaders from the constraints of gender roles. Journal of Social Issues , 56(1), 49-64.
48.
Linstone, H.A., & Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications . Retrieved February 27, 2005, from http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/ch1.html
49.
Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
Lorber, J. (2005). Gender inequality. Los Angeles : Roxbury.
51.
Lynn, S.A., Cao, L.T., & Horn, B.C. (1996). The influence of career stage on the work attitudes of male and female accounting professionals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 135-149.
52.
Marion, R. (2002). Leadership in education: Organizational theory for the practitioner. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
53.
Marion, R., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadership in complex organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 389-418.
54.
Martin, J.R. (2000). Coming of age in academe: Rekindling women's hopes and reforming the academy. New York: Routledge.
55.
McCall, A.L. (1999). Can feminist voices survive and transform the academy? In S. Steinberg (Ed.), The edge: Critical studies in educational theory (pp. 83-108). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
56.
Mertz, N.T., Welch, O.M., & Henderson, J. (1987, November). Why women aren't mentored. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Portland, OR. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED292953)
57.
Moore, K.M. (1982). What to do until the mentor arrives? [Professional advancement kit]. Washington, DC: National Association for Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED234296)
58.
Morgan, R. (2003). Sisterhood is forever: The women's anthology for a new millennium. New York: Washington Square Press.
59.
Morrison, A.M., White, R.P., & Van Velsor, E. , & the Center for Creative Leadership. (1992). Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America's largest corporations (Upd. ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
60.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2005). 2004 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF:04) report on faculty and instructional staff in Fall 2003. Retrieved December 5, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005172.pdf
61.
Novick, R. (1998). The comfort corner: Fostering resiliency and emotional intelligence. Childhood Education, 74(4), 200-204.
62.
Oakley, J.G. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEO's. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 321-334.
63.
Offerman, L.R., & Beil, C. (1992). Achievement styles of women leaders and their peers: Toward an understanding of women and leadership. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 37-56.
64.
Ornstein, S., & Isabella. L. (1990). Age versus stage models of career attitudes of women: A partial replication and extension. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 1-19.
65.
Rains, K. (1999). Dancing on the sharp edge of the sword: Women faculty of color in White academe. In L. K. Christian-Smith & K. S. Kellor (Eds.), Everyday knowledge and uncommon truth: Women of the Academy, (pp. 147-174). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
66.
Richardson, G.E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 307-321.
67.
Ritt, E. (2004, Winter). Hearing the opus: The paradox for women leaders in the postmodern university. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, 16. Retrieved March 9, 2005, from http://www.advancingwomen.com/awl/winter2004/Ritt.html
68.
Ropers-Huilman, B. (2003). Gender in the future of higher education. In B. Ropers-Huilman (Ed.), Gendered futures in higher education: Critical perspectives for change (pp. 1-11). Albany : State University of New York Press.
69.
Ropers-Huilman, B., & Shackelford, M. (2003). Negotiating identities and making change: Feminist faculty in higher education. In B. Ropers-Huilman (Ed.), Gendered futures in higher education: Critical perspectives for change. (pp. 135-147). Albany: State University Press of New York.
70.
Rubenstein, H. (2003, March 18). Women and leadership: Review of recent studies. Service and Support Professionals Association News . Retrieved December 5, 2006, from http://www.thesspa.com/sspanews/031803/article2.asp
71.
Ryan, L. (2005, May). Canary in the coal mine. Retrieved May 22, 2005, from http://www.worldwit.org/Columns/TimeOfTheMonth/Toxic_Air_At_Work/
72.
Schmuck, P.A., & Schubert, J. (1995). Women principals' views on sex equity: Exploring issues of integration and information. In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 274-287). Albany: State University of New York Press.
73.
Schroeder, D.S., & Mynatt, C.R. (1999, March). Graduate students' relationships with their male and female major professors. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 40(5—6), 393-420.
74.
Schwartz, R.A. (1997, September/October). Reconceptualizing the leadership roles of women in higher education: A brief history on the importance of deans of women. Journal of Higher Education68(5), 502-522.
75.
Shakeshaft, C. (1987). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
76.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). The gender gap in research in educational administration . Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 324-337.
77.
Shakeshaft, C., & Nowell, I. (1984). Research on theories, concepts, and models of organizational behavior: The influence of gender. Issues in Education, 2(3), 186-203.
78.
Short, P.M., Twale, D.J., & Walden, J.C. (1989, March). Women professors of educational administration: A profile and salient issues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED306656)
79.
Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: How women's and men's conversational styles affect who gets heard, who gets credit, and what gets done. New York: Morrow.
80.
Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2, 149-171.
81.
Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S.R. (2005). Computer based Delphi processes. Retrieved February 27, 2005, from http://eies.njit.edu/~turoff/Papers/delphi3.html
82.
Twombly, S. (1999). Review essay new scholarship on academic women: Beyond “women's ways.” Review of Higher Education , 22(4), 441-454.
83.
Using Delphi technique in assessing needs for VTET. (n.d.). SEAMEO Voctech Journal. Retrieved February 27, 2005, from http://www.voctech.org.bn/virtual_lib/Programme/Regular/Emerging99/Using%20Delphi%20Technique.htm
84.
van der Velde, M.E.G., Bossink, C.J.H., & Jansen, P.G.W. (2003, August). Gender differences in the influence of professional tenure on work attitudes. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 49(3—4), 153-162.
85.
Werner, E.E., & Smith, R.S. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Whatley, A. (1998). Gifted women and teaching: A compatible choice?Roeper Review, 21(2), 4.
88.
Wolin, S.J., & Wolin, S. (1993). The resilient self. New York : Villard Books.
89.
Yoder, J. (2001). Making leadership work more effectively for women . Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 815-828.
90.
Young, I.M. (2003). The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 29, 1-25.
