Background: Women school leaders may act as social agents who promote gender equality, but evidence is inconclusive regarding the effect of women's leadership on gender stratification in the workplace.
Purpose: Based on the similarity-attraction perspective, this study examined male and female school leaders' relations to similar others in three educational systems: Jewish secular public schools, Jewish religious public schools, and Arab schools. As these school systems represent distinct sociocultural contexts regarding women's status, the study tested for differences among them in women's sponsorship of other women.
Data Collection and Analysis: The study was based on a survey conducted by the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics in 2000 that included (N = 63, 886) teachers and school administrators. The data were analyzed by conducting several multinomial logistic regression analyses in which the dependent variable was holding an internal leadership position within the school.
Findings: The findings indicated that female school leaders have more diversified behavior to other women than male school leaders show in regard to men. The extent to which women promoted other women depended on their relative social power within each educational system.
Conclusions: The study supports the claim that sponsoring similar others tends to be context bound, as gender inequality in holding internal administrative positions differed according to school principals'gender and to educational system. The implications of the study are discussed.
Acker, S. (1994). Creating career: Women teachers at work. In S. Acker (Ed.), Gendered education (pp. 105-124). Toronto, Canada: OISE Press.
2.
Acker, S. (1995). The head teachers as a career broker: Stories from an English primary school. In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 49-70). New York: State University of New York Press.
3.
Acker, J. (1999). Gender and organizations. In J. S. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 177-194). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
4.
Addi-Raccah, A. (2002). The feminization of teaching and principalship in the Israeli education system: A comparative study. Sociology of Education, 75, 231-248.
5.
Addi-Raccah, A., & Ayalon, H. (2002). Gender inequality in leadership positions: A comparison of three educational sectors in Israel. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(2), 157-177.
6.
Addi-Raccah, A., & Chen, M. (2000). Men and women in administrative positions in the Jewish and Arab educational systems: Minority versus majority [Hebrew]. In S. Shlasky (Ed.), Sexuality and gender in education (pp. 85-113). Tel Aviv, Israel: Ramot.
7.
Akiba, M, & Reichardt, R. (2004). What predicts the mobility of elementary school leaders? An analysis of longitudinal data in Colorado. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(18), 1068-2341.
8.
Al-Haj, M. (1988). Academic Arabs in Israel. In M. Al-Haj (Ed.), The occupational stress among academic Arabs in Israel [Hebrew]. Haifa, Israel: Haifa University, the Middle East Research Institute.
9.
Al-Haj, M. (1996). Education among the Arabs in Israel [Hebrew]. Jerusalem, Israel: Magnes Press, The Hebrew University, and the Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies.
10.
Allan, J. (1993). Male elementary teachers: Experiences and perspectives. In C. L. Williams (Ed.), Doing women's work: Men in nontraditional occupations (pp. 113-127). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Ayalon, H., & Yogev, A. (1996). The alternative worldview of state religious high schools in Israel. Comparative Education Review, 40(1), 7-28.
12.
Barkol, R., & Kupferberg, I. (2001). Under man's umbrella: Transition stories from teaching to principalship of men and women in the Arab sector in Israel [Hebrew]. Studies in Educational Administration and Organization, 25, 121-152.
13.
Beekley, C. (1999). Dancing in red shoes. In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dream: Women and the superintendency (pp. 161-175). Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
Bell, C. S. (1995).“If I weren't involved with schools, I might be radical”: Gender consciousness in context. In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 288-312). New York: State University of New York Press.
15.
Birkelund, G. E. (1997, August). Part-time in Scandinavia. Paper presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the America Sociological Association, Toronto, Canada.
16.
Blackmore, J. (1996). ‘Breaking the silence’: Feminist contribution to educational administration and policy. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 997-1042). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
17.
Blackmore, J. (1999). Troubling women: Feminism, leadership and educational change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
18.
Brunner, C. C. (2000a). Seeking presentation: Supporting Black female graduate students who aspire to the superintendency. Urban Education, 35(5), 532-549.
19.
Brunner, C. C. (2000b). Unsettled moments in settled discourse: Women superintendents'experience of inequality. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 36(1), 76-116.
20.
Chen, M., & Addi, A. (1992). Principals' gender and the work orientation of male and female teachers. Transformation, 3(2), 5-14.
21.
Chen, M., & Addi, A. (1995). The effect of principal's gender on teachers'attitudes toward their work. In Y. Dror & S. Oren (Eds.), The pedagogical poem: A book in honor of Abraham Oren(pp. 125-140) [Hebrew]. Tel Aviv, Israel: Ort Publications, Migdal-Ha'emek Municipality and Oranim College of Education.
22.
Chen, M., Addi-Raccah, A., & Inbar, N. (1998). Between academic degree and certification in educational administration: A follow-up study. Studies in Educational Administration and Organization, 22, 5-34.
23.
Chen, M., & Goldring, E. (1995). Aspiring teacher-leaders and school change. Curriculum andTeaching, 10(2), 75-83.
24.
Cohen, L. E., Broschak, J. P., & Haveman, H. A. (1998).And then there were more? The effect of organizational sex composition on the hiring and promotion of managers. American Sociological Review, 63, 711-728.
25.
Coleman, M. (2002). Managing for equal opportunities. In T. Bush & L. Bell (Eds.), The principles and practice of educational management (pp. 135-150). London: Sage.
26.
Dagan, M. (1995). A note to the principal in the state religious education [Hebrew]. In N. Greenbuim & A. Herman (Eds.), Issues in the state religious education. Jerusalem, Israel: The Ministry of Education and Culture.
27.
Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2000). Developing comparative and international educational leadership and management: A cross-cultural model. School Leadership & Management, 20(2), 143-160.
28.
Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2002). School leadership in context-societal and organizational cultures. In T. Bush & L. Bell (Eds.), The principles and practice of educational management(pp. 70-85). Paul Chapman.
29.
Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2000). The leadership style of women and men, Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781-797.
30.
Eden, D. (2000). Israel's gender equality in education: Revolution or containment?Urban Education, 35, 473-495.
31.
Ely, R. J. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203-238.
32.
Ely, R. J. (1995). The power of demography: Women's social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 589-634.
33.
Enomoto, E. K., Gardiner, M. E., & Grogan, M. (2000). Notes to Athene: Mentoring relationships for women of color. Urban Education, 35(5), 567-584.
34.
Espanioly, N. (1994).Palestinian womenin Israel: Identity in light of the occupation. In T. Mayer (Ed.), Women and the Israeli occupation (pp. 121-137). London: Routledge.
35.
Fitzgerald, T. (2003). Interrogating orthodox voices: Gender, ethnicity and educational leadership. School Leadership and Management, 23(4), 431-444.
36.
Fuchs, I., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1996). What it is like to be a school principal? Women tell their stories [Hebrew]. Megamot, 37, 292-313.
37.
Gaziel, H., & Tzoyzner, I. (1987). High school teachers'expectations for promotion to administrative and instructional roles. Studies in Educational Administration and Organization, 14, 95-108.
38.
Goldring, E. B., & Rallis, S. H. (1993). Principals of dynamic schools. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
39.
Grace, G. (1995). School leadership. London: Falmer.
40.
Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1995). The effect of sex similarity on recruiters' evaluation of actual applications: A test of similarity-attraction paradigm. Personnel Psychology, 48(1), 85-98.
41.
Grogan, M. (1999). Equity/equality issues of gender, race, and class. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 518-536.
42.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1999). Can leadership enhance school effectiveness? In T. Bush, L. A. Bell, R. Bolman, R. Galtter, & P. M. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice (pp.178-190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Hardin, J. R., Reding, K. F., & Stocks, M. H. (2002). The effect of gender on the recruitment of entry-level accountants. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(2), 251-266.
44.
Hart, A. W. (1995). Women ascending to leadership: The organizational socialization of principals. In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 105-144). Albany: State University of New York.
45.
Hassan, M. (1991). Growing up female and Palestinian in Israel. In B. Swirski & M. P. Safir (Eds.), Calling the equality bluff: Women in Israel (pp.66-74).New York: Pergamon, Ethnic.
46.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotype prevent women's access up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657-674.
47.
Herzog, H. (1998). Double marginality: “Oriental” and Arab women in local politics. In O. Yiftachel & A. Meir (Eds.), Ethnic frontiers and peripheries (pp. 287-308). Boulder, CO: Westview.
48.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422-447.
49.
Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. The Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56-87.
50.
Irby, B. J., & Brown, G. (2002). Women leaders: Creating inclusive school environments. In J. Koch & B. Irby (Eds.), Defining and redefining gender equity in education (pp. 43-58). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
51.
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (1997). Characteristics and ranking of local authorities according to the population's socio-economic level in 1995 [Hebrew]. Jerusalem, Israel: Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport.
52.
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2002). Teaching staff survey 1999/2000 [Hebrew]. Jerusalem, Israel: Author.
53.
Israel Ministry of Education and Culture. (2004). The work conditions of educators [Hebrew]. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.il/serut/downlaod/7.3.rtf
54.
Izraeli, D. (1997). Israeli women in administration position. In A. Maor (Ed.), Women—The rising power [Hebrew] (pp. 56-75). Tel-Aviv, Israel: Pohalim Publications.
55.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
56.
Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Cioci, M. (1993). Teachers and principals: Gender-related perceptions of leadership and power in secondary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 153-180.
57.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times (pp. 21-39). Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
58.
Lewin-Epstein, N., & Semyonov, M. (1993). The Arab minority in Israel's economy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
59.
Lewin-Epstein, N., & Semyonov, M. (1994).Shelteredlabor markets, public sector employment, and socio-economic return to education of Arabs in Israel. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 622-651.
60.
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62.
Mar'i, M., & Mar'i, S. K. (1985). The role of women as a change agent in Arab society in Israel. In M. Safir, M. T. Mednich, D. Izraeli, & J. Bernard (Eds.), Women's world (pp. 251-260). New York: Praeger.
63.
Mar'i, S. K. (1975). Arab education in Israel. New York: Syracuse University Press.
64.
Marshall, C. (1993). Politics of denial: Gender and race issues in administration. In C. Marshall (Ed.), The politics of race and gender (pp. 168-174). London: Falmer.
65.
Matthews, E. N. (1995).Women in educational administration: Views of equity. In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 247-265). Albany: State of University of New York Press.
66.
Mazawi, A. E. (1996). Patterns of competition over school-management position and the mediation of social inequalities. Israeli Social Science Research, 11(1), 87-114.
67.
McGuire, G. M. (2002). Gender, race, and the shadow structure: A study of informal networks and inequality in work organization. Gender & Society, 16(3), 303-322.
68.
McNeilly, K. M., & Russ, F. A. (2000). Does relational demography matter in personal selling context?The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 20(4), 279-288.
69.
Mertz, N. T., & McNeely, S. R. (1998). Women on the job: A study of female high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 196-222.
70.
Moore, D. (1998). Gender identities and social action: Arab and Jewish women in Israel. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(1), 5-29.
71.
Moore, D. (2000). Gender identity, nationalism, and social action among Jewish and Arab women in Israel: Redefining the social order. Gender Issue, 18(2), 3-28.
72.
Ortiz, I. F. (1982). Gender patterns in education: Women, men and minorities in public school administration. New York: Praeger.
73.
Ortiz, I. F. (2000). Who controls succession in the superintendency? A minority perspective. Urban Education, 35(5), 557-566.
74.
Ortiz, I. F. (2001).Using social capital in interpreting the careers of three Latina superintendents. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(1), 58-85.
75.
Ortiz, F. I., & Marshall, C. (1988). Women in educational administration. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 123-142). White Plains, NY: Longman.
76.
Ortiz, I. F., & Ortiz, J. D. (1993). Politicizing executive action: The case of Hispanic female superintendents. In C. Marshall (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender (pp. 155-167). London: Falmer.
77.
Ozga, J. (1993). Introduction: In a different mode. In J. Ozga (Ed.), Women in educational management (pp.1-15). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
78.
Pepperell, S., & Smedley, S. (1998). Calls for more men in primary teaching: Problematizing the issues. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2(4), 341-357.
79.
Pounder, D. G., King, D., Hausman, C., & Bowles, W. B. (2005). The complexity of gender-role stereotyping effects in high school principal selection. In W. K. Hoy & C. G. Miskel (Eds.), Educational leadership and reform (pp. 265-300). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
80.
Powell, G., & Butterfield, D. A. (2002). Exploring the influence of decision makers' race and gender on the actual promotions to top management. Personnel Psychology, 55(2), 397-429.
81.
Rappoport, T., Penso, A., & Garb, Y. (1994). Contribution to the collective by religious girls. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15, 375-388.
82.
Reay, D., & Ball, S. J. (2000). Essentials of female management: Women's ways of working in the education market place. Educational Management & Administration, 28(2), 149-159.
83.
Regan, H. B., & Brooks, G. H. (1995). Out of women's experience: Creating relational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
84.
Reis, S. B., Young, P. I., & Jury, J. C. (1999). Female administrators: A crack in the glass ceiling. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(1), 71-82.
85.
Reskin, B. F. (2003). Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality. American Sociological Review, 68, 1-21.
86.
Reskin, B. F., & Roos, A. R. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women's inroad into male occupation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
87.
Riehl, C., & Byrd, M. A. (1997). Gender differences among new recruits to school administration: Cautionary footnotes to an optimistic tale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 45-64.
88.
Riehl, C., & Lee, V. E. (1996). Gender, organizations and leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 879-919). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
89.
Schmuck, P. A. (1996) Women's place in educational administration: Past, present, and future. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 873-919). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
90.
Schmuck, P. A., & Schubert, J. (1995). Women principals'views on sex equity. In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 274-287). Albany: State University of New York Press.
91.
Schwarzwald, Y. (1990). State religious education: Reality and research [Hebrew]. Ramat-Gan, Israel: Bar Ilan Publication.
92.
Semyonov, M., & Lewin-Epstein, N. (1986). Economic development, investment dependence and the rise of services in less developed nations. Social Forces, 64, 582-598.
93.
Semyonov, M., & Lewin-Epstein, N. (1987). Hewers of wood and drawers of water (Report No. 013). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, International Labor Relations.
94.
Semyonov, M., Lewin-Epstein, N., & Braham, I. (1999).Changing labour force participation and occupational status: Arab women in the Israeli labour force. Work, Employment and Society, 13(1), 117-131.
95.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective perspective (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
96.
Shakeshaft, C. (1987). Womenin educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
97.
Shakeshaft, C. (1999).The struggle to create a more gender-inclusive profession. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 99-118). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
98.
Shapira, T. (1999). Women as innovators in Arab schools [Hebrew]. Master's thesis, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
99.
Shapira, T., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2002). Muslim women in forefront of change in schools [Hebrew]. Studies in Educational Administration and Organization, 26, 35-69.
100.
Shavit, Y. (1992). Arab in the Israeli economy: A study of the enclave hypothesis. Israeli Social Science Research, 7(1-2), 47-66.
101.
Shokeid, M. (1998). Ethnic identity and the social status of Arab women in Israeli city. In M. Shokeid & S. Deshen (Eds.), The cross-cultural experience (pp. 225-243). Tel Aviv, Israel: Schoen Publishing.
102.
Smith, R. A. (2002). Race, gender and authority in the workplace: Theory and research. American Review of Sociology, 28, 509-542.
103.
Smooha, S. (1993). Class, ethnic and national splits and democracy in Israel. In U. Ram (Ed.), Israeli society: Critical perspectives [Hebrew] (pp. 172-202). Tel Aviv, Israel: Breirot Publishers.
104.
Smulyan, L. (2000) Balancing acts: Women principals at work. Albany: State University of New York Press.
105.
Spencer, A. D. (1997). Teaching as women's work. In B.J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 153-198). Netherlands: Kluwer.
106.
Strober, M. H. (1988, April & June). The processes of occupational segregation: Relative attractiveness and patriarchy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA, and at the International Conference on Private Women-Public Work, Haifa, Israel.
107.
Suad, J. (Ed.). (2000). Gender and citizenship in the Middle East. Utica, NY: Syracuse University Press.
108.
Swirski, B. (2000). The citizenship of Jewish and Palestinian Arab women in Israel. In J. Suad (Ed.), Gender and citizenship in the Middle East (pp. 314-346).Utica, NY: Syracuse University Press.
109.
Swirski, S., Conor, E., Swirski, B., & Yehezkel, Y. (2001). Women at the labor market of the welfare state. Tel Aviv, Israel: Adva Center.
110.
Tallerico, M. (2000). Gaining access to the superintendency: Headhunting, gender, and color. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 18-43.
111.
Tallerico, M., & Burstyn, J. N. (1996). Retaining women in superintendency: The location matter. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 642-664.
112.
Tessler M., & Grant, A. (1998). Israel's Arab citizens: The continuing struggle. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 555, 97-113.
113.
Tolbert, P. S., Graham, E. M., & Andrews, O. A. (1999). Group gender composition and work group relations. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 179-202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
114.
Tsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, L. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
115.
van Engen, M. L., & Willemsen, T. M. (2000). Gender and leadership styles: A review of the past decade (Work paper 00.10.09). Tilbury, Netherlands: Universiteit van Tilbury.
116.
Yishai, Y. (1997). Between the flag and the banner: Women in Israeli politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
117.
Yoder, J. D. (2001). Making leadership work more effectively for women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 815-828.
118.
Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
119.
Williams, C. L. (1992).The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the female profession. Social Problems, 39(3), 253-267.
120.
Wright, O. E., Baxter, J., & Birkelund, G. E. (1995). The gender gap in workplace authority: A cross-national study. American Sociological Review, 60(3), 407-435.
