The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of gender, role conflict, role commitment, and job satisfaction on the high school principal. Data were collected from high school principals in three midwestern states. The results indicated that there are differences between female and male high school principals in their personal and professional attributes as well as in role conflict. There were similarities between female and male high school principals in terms of role commitment and job satisfaction.
Bacharach, S., & Mitchell, S. (1983). The sources of dissatisfaction in educational administration: A role-specific analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(1), 101-128.
2.
Blount, J. (1998). Destined to rule the schools: Women and the superintendency, 1873-1995. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3.
Boris-Schacter, S., & Langer, S. (2002). Caught between nostalgia and utopia. Education Week, 11(21), 34-37.
4.
Brunner, C. C. (Ed.). (1999). Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5.
Burke, R. (2002). Organizational culture: A key to the success of work and family programs. In R. Burke& D. Nelson (Eds.), Advancing women’s careers: Research and practice (pp. 287– 309). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
6.
Burke, R., & Nelson, D. (2002). Advancing women in management: Progress and prospects. In R. Burke & D. Nelson (Eds.), Advancing women’s careers: Research and practice (pp. 3– 15). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
7.
Chambers, J. (1999). The job satisfaction of managerial and executive women: Revisiting the assumptions. Journal of Education for Business, 75(2), 69-74.
8.
Clarkberg, M.,& Moen, P. (2001). Understanding the time-squeeze: Married couples’ preferred and actual work-hour strategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(7), 1115-1136.
9.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Copland, M. (2001). The myth of the superprincipal. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(7), 528-533.
11.
Derlin, R., & Schneider, G. T. (1994). Understanding job satisfaction: Principals and teachers, urban and suburban. Urban Education, 29(1), 63-88.
Eckman, E. (2002). Women high school principals: Perspectives on role conflict, role commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of School Leadership, 12(1), 57-77.
14.
Edson, S. (1988). Pushing the limits: The female administrative aspirant. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
Fansher, T.,& Buxton, T. (1984). Ajob satisfaction profile of the female secondary school principal in the United States. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 68(468), 32-39.
16.
Fauth, G. (1984). Women in educational administration: A research profile. Educational Forum, 49(1), 65-79.
17.
Fenwick, L.,& Pierce, M. C. (2001, March). The principal shortage: Crisis or opportunity?Principal [Online], 80(4). Available: www.naesp.org/comm/p0301a.htm
18.
Ferrandino, V., & Tirozzi, G. (2001). How do you reinvent a principal?Education Week, 20(20), 8-9.
19.
Fishel, A.,& Pottker, J. (1979). Performance of women principals: Review of behavioral and attitudinal studies. In M. Berry (Ed.), Women in educational administration: A book of readings (pp. 24-31). Washington, DC: National Association for Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors.
20.
Gates, S. (2003). What evidence do we have of a crisis in school leadership? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
21.
Gerson, K., & Jacobs, J. (2001). Changing the structure and culture of work: Work and family conflict, work flexibility, and gender equity in the modern workplace. In R. Hertz& N. Marshall (Eds.), Working families: The transformation of the American home (pp. 207-226). Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Goldberg, C. (1991). A study of the career paths of administrators in central office positions in New York State public schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 341 145)
23.
Grady, M., & O’Connell, P. (1993). Women in K-12 educational administration: A synthesis of dissertation research. Journal of School Leadership, 3, 449-460.
24.
Greenglass, E. R., Pantony, K.,& Burke, R. J. (1989). Agender-role perspective on role conflict, work stress and social support. In E. B. Goldsmith (Ed.), Work and family (pp. 317-328). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Grogan, M. (1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
Gross, N., & Trask, A. (1976). The sex factor and the management of schools. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
Gunn, J., & Holdaway, E. (1986). Perceptions of effectiveness, influence, and satisfaction of senior high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(2), 43-62.
28.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking Press.
29.
Houston, P. (1998). The ABC’s of administrative shortages. Education Week, 17(38), 32-44.
30.
Hurley, J. (2001). The principalship: Less may be more. Education Week, 20(37), 37-39.
31.
Institute for Educational Leadership. (2000, October). Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship. Areport of the Task Force on the Principalship, School Leadership for the 21st Century Initiative.
32.
Johnson, G., Yeakey, C.,& Moore, S. (1980). An analysis of the employment ofwomen in professional administrative positions in public education. Planning and Changing, 11(3), 115–132.
33.
Kelly, R. M. (1997). Gender, culture and socialization. In D. Dunn (Ed.), Workplace/women’s place: An anthology. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Co.
34.
Kochan, F., Spencer, W., & Mathews, J. (2000). Gender-based perceptions of the challenges, changes, and essential skills of the principalship. Journal of School Leadership, 10(3), 290-310.
35.
Lipsey, M. (1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Malone, B., Sharp, W.,& Thompson, J. (2000). The Indiana principalship: Perceptions of principals, aspiring principals, and superintendents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 44706)
37.
Marshall, C. (Ed.). (1997). Feminist critical policy analysis: Aperspective fromprimary and secondary schooling. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
38.
Marshall, C.,& Mitchell, B. (1989, March). Women’s careers as a critique of the administrative culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 307 675)
39.
Matthews, L.,& Crow, G. (2003). Being and becoming a principal: Role conceptions for contemporary principals and assistant principals. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
40.
Mendenhall, D. R. (1977). Relationship of organizational structure and leadership behavior to teacher job satisfaction in IGE schools (Tech. Rep. No. 412). Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning.
41.
Merrill, R.,& Pounder, D. (1999, November). Attraction and retention of high school principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council of Educational Administration, Minneapolis, MN.
42.
Napholz, L. (1995a). Indexes of psychological well-being and role commitment amongworking women. Journal of Employment Counseling, 32(1), 22–32.
43.
Napholz, L. (1995b). Mental health and American Indian women’s multiple roles. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research: Journal of the National Center, 6(2), 57–75.
44.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2000). Educational equity for girls and women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
45.
Nevill, D.,& Damico, S. (1974). Development of a role conflict questionnaire forwomen: Some preliminary findings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(5), 743.
46.
Ortiz, F. (1982). Career patterns in education: Women, men and minorities in public school administration. New York: Praeger Publishers.
47.
Paddock, S. (1981). Male and female career paths in school administration. In P. Schmuck, W. Charters, & R. Carlson (Eds.), Educational policy and management: Sex differentials (pp. 187–198). New York: Academic Press.
48.
Pavan, B. (1991, April). Reflections of female school administrators regarding their careers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334 676)
49.
Protheroe, N. (2001). Attracting and retaining high quality people for the principalship: Problems and possibilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
50.
Rice, E. M.,& Schneider, G. T. (1994). A decade of teacher empowerment: An empirical analysis of teacher involvement in decision making, 1980-1991. Journal of Educational Administration, 32(1), 43-58.
51.
Riehl, C., & Byrd, M. (1997). Gender differences among new recruits to school administration: Cautionary footnotes to an optimistic tale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(1), 45-64.
52.
Riesch, S. (1981). Occupational commitment, role conflict, and the quality of maternal-infant interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rush University, Chicago, IL.
53.
Rogus, J., Poppenhagen, B., & Mingus, J. (1980). As secondary principals view themselves: Implications for principal preparation. High School Journal, 63(4), 167-172.
54.
Roza, M.,& Wishon, S. (2003). The principal shortage: A problem of definition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
55.
Schmuck, P. (1981). The sex dimension of school organization: Overview and synthesis. In P. Schmuck, W. Charters,& R. Carlson (Eds.), Educational policy and management: Sex differentials (pp. 221-234). New York: Academic Press.
56.
Schneider, G. T. (1984). Teacher involvement in decision making: Zones of acceptance, decision conditions, and job satisfaction. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 18(1), 25-32.
57.
Schneider, G. T. (1986). Career path and mobility differences of women and men in educational administration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
58.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
59.
Tallerico, M. (1999). Women and the superintendency: What do we really know? In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 29-48). Albany: State University of New York Press.
60.
Thompson, D., McNamara, J.,& Hoyle, J. (1997). Job satisfaction in educational organizations: A synthesis of research findings. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(1), 7-37.
61.
Vadella, R., & Willower, D. (1990). High school principals discuss their work. NASSP Bulletin, 74(525), 108-118.
62.
Valentine, P. (1995). Women’s working worlds: A case study of a female organization. In D. Dunlap& P. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 340-357). Albany: State University of New York Press.
63.
Williams, C. (2000). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. In A. Minas (Ed.), Gender basics: Feminist perspectives on women and men (2nd ed., pp. 158–165). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
64.
Young, M., & McLeod, S. (2001). Flukes, opportunities, and planned interventions: Factors affecting women’s decisions to become school administrators. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(4), 462-502.
