American Federation of Teachers
. (1994). The private management of public schools: An analysis of the EAI experiment in Baltimore. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Apple, M.
(1993, April 15). The privatization of education: Empirical and ethical question.AERA Annual Meeting, Section 42.17, Atlanta, GA.
3.
Astuto, T. A.
, Clark, D. L., Read, A. M., McGree, K., & Fernandez, L. D. (1994). Roots of reform: Challenging the assumptions that control change in education. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
4.
Beales, J. R.
, & O'Leary, J. (1993). Making schools work: Contracting options for better management. Policy Study, 169, 1-40.
5.
Bennett, D. A.
(1992). Reinventing school system governance through public/private ventures. The School Administrator, 49(7), 12.
6.
Boyd, W. L.
(1990). The national level: Reagan and the bully pulpit. In N. Bacharach (Ed.), Education reform: Making sense of it all (pp. 42-51). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Brown, F.
(1991). Introduction: School choice and the politics of decline. Education and Urban Society, 23, 115-118.
8.
Bullock, P.
, & Taylor, B. 0. (1993). Making school reform happen: A book of hope about America's schools-How parents and educators can revitalize learning for our children. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Butler, S. M.
(1985). Introduction. In S. M. Butler (Ed.), The privatization option: A strategy to shrink the size of government (p. vii). Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
10.
Clarkson, K. W.
(1989). Privatization at the state and local level. In P. W. MacAvoy, W. T. Stanbury, G. Yarrow, & R. J. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Privatization and state-owned enterprises (pp. 143-194). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
11.
Cuban, L.
(1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
Edelman, M.
(1985). The symbolic uses of politics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
13.
Fullan, M. G.
, & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
Golle, J. T.
(1994, June 22). You must take care of your customers. Education Week, pp. 44-45.
15.
Gormley, W. T.
(1991). Privatization and its alternatives. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
16.
Gross, B.
, & Gross, R. (1985). The great school debate: Which way for American education?New York: Touchstone Books.
17.
Guthrie, J. W.
, Garms, W. I., & Pierce, L. C. (1988). School finance andeducation and education policy: Enhancing educational efficiency, equality, and choice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Hilke, J.
(1993). Cost savings from privatization: A complilation of study findings. Los Angeles: The Reason Foundation.
19.
Hodgkinson, H.
(1991). Reform versus reality. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1), 9-16.
20.
Kent, C. A.
(1987). Privatization of public functions: Promises and problems. In C. A. Kent (Ed.), Entrepreneurship and the privatising of government (pp. 1-21). New York: Quorum Books.
21.
Kirst, M. W.
(1990). The crash of the first wave: Recent state education reform in the United States; looking backward and forward. In N. Bacharach (Ed.), Education reform: Making sense of it all (pp. 20-29). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
Larrabee, J.
(1994, August 3). Teachers fight running public schools for profit. USA Today, p. 5D.
23.
Lee, D.
(1991). Vouchers: The key to reform. In W. T. Gormley (Ed.), Privatization and its alternatives (pp. 281-306). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
24.
Lieberman, M.
(1989). Privatization and education choice. New York: St. Martin.
25.
Molnar, A.
(1994, July). Whittle, Molnar to spar on privatization. Connections: The national conference on education. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
26.
Pack, J. R.
(1991). The opportunities and constraints of privatization. In W. T. Gormley (Ed.), Privatization and its alternatives (pp. 281-306). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
27.
Putka, G.
(1994). Fast learner: Do for-profit schools work? They seem to for one entrepreneur. Wall Street Journal, p. 1.
28.
Riegal, R. B.
(1994). Twenty years of successful private management. The School Administrator, 51(5), 34-38.
29.
Rigert, J.
, & Command, C. (1994, June 4). Education fm oversells its record: Company has made false claims, failed to meet goals. Minneapolis Star Tribune, p. 1.
30.
Ruffini, S. J.
, Howe, L. F., & Borders, D. G. (1994). The early implementation of Tesseract: 1992-93 evaluation report. Baltimore: Baltimore City Public School Districts.
31.
Sava, E. S.
(1985). The efficiency of the private sector. In S. Budler (Ed.), The privatization option: A strategy to shrink the size of government (pp. 17-31). Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
32.
Scarlett, L.
, & Haarmeyer, P. (1992). Privatization 1992. Los Angeles: Reason Foundation.
33.
Schmidt, B. C.
(1994, June 22). A very different kind of school. Education Week, pp. 42-43.
34.
Schmidt, P.
(1994a, August 3). Hartford asks E.A.I. to help run its district. Education Week, p. 1.
35.
Schmidt, P.
(1994b, May 25). Private enterprise. Education Week, pp. 27-30.
36.
Schmidt, P.
(1994c, August 3). E.A.I. faulted on special-ed. compliance in Baltimore. Education Week, p. 19.
37.
Shanker, A.
(1994, June 22). Private enterprise. Education Week, p. 43-44.
38.
Stecklow, S.
(1994, May 12). Wichita agrees to let Edison project run two elementary schools for profit. Wall Street Journal, p. 5.
39.
Yudof, M.
(1991). School finance reform in Texas: The Edgewood saga. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2), 499-505.
