Previous studies have been able to establish a tenet suggesting that free basic education in emerging nations doesn’t generally pronounce quality, and the standard of free schooling is distinctly better in urban schools compared to their rural counterparts due to the parental participation. Under the acceptance of such tenet, the question of whether children of urban floating parents may even gain an access and attend free basic education has not yet been addressed—a subject of this study. A survey with 1,523 urban floating parents from 4 locations in Bangladesh who had 4,376 children at the age of basic schooling was conducted to learn more about the obstacles floating parents encounter when trying to provide their children with a basic education. The data was analysed using a descriptive statistical model, which indicates that despite tuition fees being waived and free textbooks being provided, three main problems—the absence of childcare attendants, transportation, and school utility fees—restrict the children to access or regularly attend the school in Bangladesh. Given the current situation, a generic model of free basic education might cover a greater portion of children in lower-quality basic education; nonetheless, children of urban floating parents continue to go neglected, necessitating a different kind of intervention.
AfrinT.IslamM. S. (2023). Exploring the livelihood pattern of the floating population using the SL framework: A case study of metropolitan Dhaka, Bangladesh. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 28(1), 284–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2021.1884173
2.
AlamS.AdnanZ. H.BatenM. A.BagS. (2022). Assessing vulnerability of informal floating workers in Bangladesh before and during COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-method analysis. Benchmarking An International Journal, 29(5), 1677–1702. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-06-2021-0329
3.
ArditaC.RabijeM. (2016). The role of parents in the education of children. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(5), 61–64.
4.
AlamG. M.ParvinM. (2023). Three parameters of urban K-8 education during pre- and post-covid-19 restrictions: Comparison of students of slums, tin-sheds, and flats in Bangladesh. Education and Urban Society, 55(9), 1120–1143.
5.
AlamG. M.ParvinM. (2024). Has Secondary Science Program Become an Elite Urban Education Product in the Former Colonized Nation?Education and Urban Society, 56(8), 1002–1024.
6.
AlamG. M.SulaimanT. (2022). Supporting youths to continue further education in emerging nations: food for education intervention or education for food policy?British Food Journal, 124(3), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0552
7.
AlamG. M. (2024). Access, attendance and performance in urban K8 education during pre- and post-COVID-19 restrictions in Bangladesh: Comparison of students in slums, tin-sheds and flats. Education, 52(4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2109183
8.
AlamG. M. (2025). Sustainable education, sustainability in education and education for sustainable development: the reconciliation of variables and the path of education research in an era of technologization. Sustainability, 17(1), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010250
9.
BelleiC.MunozG. (2023). Models of regulation, education policies, and changes in the education system: A long-term analysis of the Chilean case. Journal of Educational Change, 24, 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09435-1
10.
BhuiyanM. A.LiuZ.MengF. (2024). Measurement and difference analysis of multidimensional poverty of floating population. Kybernetes, 53(3), 1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-07-2022-0943
11.
BiestaG. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
12.
CustersB. (2022). New digital rights: Imagining additional fundamental rights for the digital era. Computer Law & Security Review, 44(4), 1–13.
13.
DurR. A. J.TeulingsC. N. (2003). Are education subsidies an efficient redistributive device?. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. 03-024/3, Tinbergen Institute.
14.
FarrasM. H.RahmawatiA.LavedaA.AlqorniW. (2025). The role of parents in handling children challenges of modern times. Bulletin of Islamic Research, 3(1), 153–164.
15.
FreemanM. (2022). Human rights. Polity Press.
16.
FuQ.RenQ. (2010). Educational inequality under China’s rural–urban divide: The Hukou system and return to education. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(3), 592–610.
17.
GaliY.SchechterC. (2020). NGO involvement in education policy: Principals’ voices. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(10), 1509–1525.
HuY. Z.XuanY.WangH. F. (2024). Does “son preference” affect rural floating parents’ willingness to settle in towns and cities?International Review of Economics & Finance, 89(B), 485–510.
20.
KushnirI.NunesA. (2022). Education and the UN development goals projects (MDGs and SDGs): Definitions, links, operationalisations. Journal of Research in International Education, 21(1), 3–21.
21.
MeadL. M. (2005). Policy research: The field dimension. Policy Studies Journal, 33(4), 535–557.
22.
MoschettiM. C.VergerA. (2020). Opting for private education: Public subsidy programs and school choice in disadvantaged contexts. Educational Policy, 34(1), 65–90.
23.
RakeshD.LeeP. A.GaikwadA.McLaughlinK. A. (2025). Annual research review: Associations of socioeconomic status with cognitive function, language ability, and academic achievement in youth: A systematic review of mechanisms and protective factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 66(4), 417–439.
24.
RoseP. (2009). NGO provision of basic education: Alternative or complementary service delivery to support access to the excluded?Compare, 39(2), 219–233.
25.
SchafferC. L.WhiteM.BrownC. M. (2018). A tale of three cities: Defining urban schools within the context of varied geographic areas. Education and Urban Society, 50(6), 507–523.
26.
ScheitleC. P.GuthrieS. K. (2019). Urban migration of sexual minorities in the United States: Myth or reality?Sexuality & Culture, 23, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9544-0
27.
SlickerG.Areizaga BarbieriC.HustedtJ. T. (2024). The role of state subsidy policies in early education programs’ decisions to accept subsidies: Evidence from nationally representative data. Early Education and Development, 35(4), 859–877.
28.
SprukJ. (2022). The role of the state in the protection of basic human rights and freedoms. Teorija in Praksa, 59(1), 166–198.
29.
TangY. (2021). ‘I want to be one of them’: A study using photovoice to explore the inequities of floating children in China. European Journal of Social Work, 24(4), 708–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1896995
30.
VillarrealA.HernandezC.GonzalezA. G.GarciaR. O.LopezJ. E. (2025). Parental Involvement Barriers and Their Influence on Student Self-Regulation in Primary Education. Education and Urban Society, 57(4), 327–346.
31.
WangX.FengY.XuY.LiuH. (2025). Do residential areas matter? Exploring the differences in motivational factors, motivation, and learning behaviors among urban high school English learners from different regions. Education and Urban Society, 57(4), 347–368.
32.
WelshR. O. (2025). Does rural mean not urban? Reconsidering the conceptualization and operationalization of rural school districts. Urban Education, 60(6), 1530–1565.
33.
WelshR. O.SwainW. A. (2020). (Re)defining urban education: A conceptual review and empirical exploration of the definition of urban education. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 90–100.
34.
YueZ.LiS.FeldmanM. W.DuH. (2010). Floating choices: A generational perspective on intentions of rural-urban migrants in China. Environment and Planning A, 42(3), 545–562.
35.
ZendeliE. (2017). The right to education as a fundamental human right. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 7(4), 158–166.
36.
ZhouZ.XinT.DuL. (2019). Floating childhoods: Psychological and educational adaptations of migrant children in China. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2019.1570884
37.
ZhuangJ.NgJ. C. K.WuQ. (2025). The role of parent–child communication on Chinese rural left-behind children’s educational expectation: A moderated mediation analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04334-1
