Students with disabilities (SWDs) are disproportionately at-risk for bullying victimization and perpetration, yet there is a lack of educator-focused professional development targeting prevention for these students. This project sought to address gaps in training through the creation of four online professional development modules: (1) understanding bullying among SWDs, (2) examining risk characteristics, (3) establishing school and classroom prevention strategies, and (4) individual prevention. These modules were iteratively developed with feedback from teachers and staff, incorporating the Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) framework to focus on interventions rooted in social emotional learning (SEL), and emphasizing the importance of prevention for SWDs.
AlbertoP.TroutmanA. C. (2013). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Pearson.
2.
BattE. G. (2010). Cognitive coaching: A critical phase in professional development to implement sheltered instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.042
3.
BearG. G.MantzL. S.GluttingJ. J.YangC.BoyerD. E. (2015). Differences in bullying victimization between students with and without disabilities. School Psychology Review, 44, 98–116. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr44-1.98-116
4.
BlakeJ. J.LundE. M.ZhouQ.KwokO. M.BenzM. R. (2012). National prevalence rates of bully victimization among students with disabilities in the United States. School Psychology Quarterly, 27(4), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000008
5.
BlumR. W.LibbeyH. P.BishopJ. H.BishopM. (2004). School connectedness—strengthening health and education outcomes for teenagers. The Journal of School Health, 74(7), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08278.x
6.
BradshawC. P. (2013). Preventing bullying through positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS): A multitiered approach to prevention and integration. Theory Into Practice, 52(4), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.829732
7.
BradshawC. P.SawyerA. L.O’BrennanL. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087929
CharmaramanL.JonesA. E.SteinN.EspelageD. L. (2013). Is it bullying or sexual harassment? Knowledge, attitudes, and professional development experiences of middle school staff. Journal of School Health, 83(6), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12048
10.
ChenL. M.SungY. H.ChengW. (2017). How to enhance teachers’ bullying identification: A comparison among providing a training program, a written definition, and a definition with a checklist of bullying characteristics. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(6), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0354-1
11.
CohenD. K.HillH. C. (2001). Learning Policy: When state education reform works. Yale University Press.
CrosbyJ. W.OehlerJ.CapaccioliK. (2010). The relationship between peer victimization and post-traumatic stress symptomatology in a rural sample. Psychology in the Schools, 47(3), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20471
14.
Dedousis-WallaceA.ShuteR.VarlowM.MurrihyR.KidmanT. (2013). Predictors of teacher intervention in indirect bullying at school and outcome of a professional development presentation for teachers. Educational Psychologist, 34(7), 862–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785385
15.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x08331140
16.
DesimoneL. M.PorterA. C.GaretM. S.YoonK. S.BirmanB. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081
17.
EspelageD. L.LowS.PolaninJ. R.BrownE. C. (2013). The impact of a middle-school program to reduce aggression, victimization, and sexual violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.021
18.
EspelageD. L.RoseC. A.PolaninJ. R. (2015). Social-emotional learning program to reduce bullying, fighting, and victimization among middle school students with disabilities. Remedial and special education, 36(5), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514564564
Forber-PrattA. J.MerrinG. J.EspelageD. L. (2020). Exploring the intersections of disability, race, and gender on student outcomes in high school. Remedial and Special Education, 42(5), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520941201
FullanM. G. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership: Journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, N.E.A, 50(6), 1–13.
23.
GageN. A.RoseC. A.KramerD. A. (2019). When prevention is not enough: Students’ perception of bullying and school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports. Behavioral Disorders, 45, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918810761
24.
GladdenR. M.Vivolo-KantorA. M.HamburgerM. E.LumpkinC. D. (2014). Bullying surveillance among youths: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, version 1.0. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Department of Education.
25.
HadfieldM.JoplingM. (2016). Problematizing lesson study and its impacts: Studying a highly contextualized approach to professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.001
26.
HanS. S.WeissB. (2005). Sustainability of teacher implementation of school-based mental health programs. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(6), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-7646-2
27.
HoltM. K.KeyesM. A. (2004). Teachers' attitudes toward bullying. In EspelageD. L.SwearerS. M. (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 121–139). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
28.
HongJ. S.EspelageD. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003
29.
JamesA. G.NoltemeyerA.RitchieR.PalmerK.UniversityM. (2019). Longitudinal disciplinary and achievement outcomes associated with school-wide PBIS implementation level. Psychology in the Schools, 56(9), 1512–1521. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22282
30.
JonesS. M.BouffardS. M. (2012). Social and emotional learning in schools: From programs to strategies and commentaries. Social Policy Report, 26(4), 1–33.
31.
KennedyT. D.RussomA. G.KevorkianM. M. (2012). Teacher and administrator perceptions of bullying in schools. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 7(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2012v7n5a395
32.
KilgusS. P.EklundK.von der EmbseN. P.TaylorC. N.SimsW. A. (2016). Psychometric defensibility of the social, academic, and emotional behavior risk screener (SAEBRS) teacher rating scale and multiple gating procedure within elementary and middle school samples. Journal of School Psychology, 58, 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.07.001
33.
LipowskyF.RzejakD. (2015). Key features of effective professional development programmes for teachers. Ricercazione, 7(2), 27–51.
34.
MainK.PendergastD. (2015). Core features of effective continuing professional development for the middle years: A tool for reflection. Research in Middle Level Education, 38(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2015.11658177
35.
MarquesM. M.LoureiroM. J.MarquesL. (2016). The dynamics of an online community of practice involving teachers and researchers. Professional Development in Education, 42(2), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.997396
MaunderR. E.HarropA.TattersallA. J. (2010). Pupil and staff perceptions of bullying in secondary schools: Comparing behavioural definitions and their perceived seriousness. Educational Researcher, 52(3), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2010.504062
38.
NahgahgwonK. N.UmbreitJ.LiaupsinC. J.TurtonA. M. (2010). Function-based planning for young children at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(4), 537–559. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42900569
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Digest of education statistics, 2018 (NCES 2020-009), Chapter 2.
41.
NovickR. M.IsaacsJ. (2010). Telling is compelling: The impact of student reports of bullying on teacher intervention. Educational Psychologist, 30(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903573123
42.
O’NeillR. E.HornerR. H.AlbinR. W.SpragueJ. R.StoreyK.NewtonJ. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
RoseC. A. (2017). Bullying among youth with disabilities: Predictive and protective factors. In: BradshawC. (Ed.), The Handbook on bullying prevention: A lifecourse perspective (113–123). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Press.
45.
RoseC. A.Monda-AmayaL. E.EspelageD. L. (2011). Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361247
46.
RoseC. A.Monda-AmayaL. E. (2012). Bullying and victimization among students with disabilities: Effective strategies for classroom teachers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451211430119
47.
RoseC. A.StormontM.WangZ.SimpsonC. G.PreastJ. L.GreenA. L. (2015). Bullying and students with disabilities: Examination of disability status and educational placement. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-15-0080.1
48.
RoseC. A.GageN. A. (2017). Exploring the involvement of bullying among students with disabilities over time. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916667587
49.
RoseC. A.HopkinsS.McGillenG.SimpsonJ. (2019). Current trends in bully prevention: Maintaining a positive school climate and culture. In BatemanD.ClineJ.YellM. (Eds.), Current trends and legal issues in special education (pp. 155–174). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
50.
RossS. W.HornerR. H. (2009). Bully prevention in positive behavior support. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(4), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-747
51.
SchwartzD.McFadyen-KetchumS.DodgeK. A.PettitG. S.BatesJ. E. (1999). Early behavior problems as a predictor of later peer group victimization: Moderators and mediators in the pathways of social risk. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021948206165
52.
ScottT. M.McIntyreJ.LiaupsinC.NelsonC. M.ConroyM.PayneL. D. (2005). An examination of the relationship between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(4), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007050070040201
53.
SimonsenB.MyersD. (2014). Classwide positive behavior interventions and supports: A guide to proactive classroom management. Guilford Publications.
54.
SonE.ParishS. L.PetersonN. A. (2012). National prevalence of peer victimization among young children with disabilities in the United States. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1540–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.04.014
55.
SugaiG.HornerR. H.SpragueJ. R. (1999). Functional-assessment-based behavior support planning: Research to practice to research. Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299902400309
TtofiM. M.FarringtonD. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1
58.
van VerseveldM. D.FukkinkR. G.FekkesM.OostdamR. J. (2019). Effects of antibullying programs on teachers’ interventions in bullying situations. A meta-analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 56(9), 1522–1539. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22283
59.
YellM. L.KatsiyannisA.RoseC. A.HouchinsD. E. (2016). Bullying and harassment of students with disabilities in schools: Legal considerations and policy formation. Remedial and Special Education, 37(5), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515614967
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
