Teacher Mobility from “Starter School” to “Forever School”: The Impact on Urban Schools and Students

Abstract

Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Framework was utilized to examine the complexity of the teacher turnover problem in regard to structural inequalities within education that need to be dismantled to create equitable outcomes for all students. Hierarchical cluster analysis was implemented to investigate school report card data of elementary schools in a rural school district (n = 18) and an urban school district (n = 41) in geographical proximity in the southeastern United States. Clusters were formed using school level variables including the breakdown of student race/ethnicity, percentage of economically disadvantaged students, teacher turnover rates, years of teaching experience, and a school performance measure. Four clusters emerged from the analysis. Across all variables there were significant differences found between clusters (p < .001) in the school performance measure, teacher turnover rates, student race/ethnicity, and percentage of students receiving free/reduced price lunch. The percentage of teachers with between 4 and 10 years of experience was statistically equivalent across all cluster groups, differences were found in the number of initially licensed teachers (a low of 9.9% in Cluster 2 to a high of 27.0% in Cluster 4) and teachers with 10 or more years experience (ranging from 46.5% in Cluster 4 to 62.2% in Cluster 2).

Keywords

inservice teachers teacher turnover teacher mobility urban schools cluster analysis standardized testing achievement/opportunity gap Bronfenbrenner’s ecological framework

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Affolter

T. L.

(2019). Through the fog: Towards inclusive anti-racist teaching. Information Age Publishing Inc.

Andrews

S. P.

Gilbert

L. S.

Martin

E. P.

(2007). The first years of teaching: Disparities in perceptions of support. Action in Teacher Education, 28(4), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2007.10463424

Berry

Bastian

K. C.

Darling-Hammond

Kini

(2021). The importance of teaching and learning conditions: Influences on teacher retention and school performance in North Carolina (Research Brief). https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/leandro-teaching-and-learning-conditions-brief

Berry

R. Q.

Walkowiak

T. A.

(2012). Using culturally relevant pedagogy and social justice to understand mathematics instructional quality in an urban context. In Moore

J. L.

Lewis

C. W.

(Eds.), African American students in urban schools: Critical issues and solutions for achievement (pp. 161–183). Peter Lang Publishing.

Brill

McCartney

(2008). Stopping the revolving door: Increasing teacher retention. Politics & Policy, 36(5), 750–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2008.00133.x

Bronfenbrenner

(1976). The experimental ecology of education. Educational Researcher, 5(9), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005009005

Carver-Thomas

Darling-Hammond

(2019). The trouble with teacher turnover: How teacher attrition affects students and schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(36), 1–32. http://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3699

Darling-Hammond

(2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters, what leaders can do. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 6–13. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ666108

Darling-Hammond

(2010). The flat world in education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.

10.

Darling-Hammond

(2017). Empowered educators. Jossey-Bass.

11.

Darling-Hammond

Saunders

Podolsky

Kini

Espinoza

Hyler

Carver-Thomas

(2019). Best practices to recruit and retain well-prepared teachers in all classrooms. Learning Policy Institute.

12.

Delpit

(2012). “Multiplication is for white people”: Raising expectations for other people’s children. The New Press.

13.

Doherty

(2020). Doherty: A systematic review of literature on teacher attrition and school related factors that affect it. Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal, 12(1), 75–84. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1276033.pdf

14.

Donaldson

M. L.

Johnson

S. M.

(2011). Teach for America teachers: How long do they teach? Why do they leave? Phi Delta Kappan, 93(2), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109300211

15.

Espel

E.V.

Meyer

S. J.

Weston-Sementelli

J. L.

(2019). Factors related to teacher mobility and attrition in Colorado, Missouri, and South Dakota (Report No. 2019008). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Science. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=REL2019008

16.

ESSA. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015-2016).

17.

García

Han

Weiss

(2022). Determinants of teacher attrition: Evidence from district-teacher matched data. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30(25), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6642

18.

Gay

(2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003

19.

Goldstein

(2014). The teacher wars: A history of America’s most embattled profession. Anchor Books.

20.

Guin

(2004). Chronic teacher turnover in urban elementary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(42), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n42.2004

21.

Hughes

G. D.

(2012). Teacher retention: Teacher characteristics, school characteristics, organizational characteristics, and teacher efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2011.584922

22.

Ingersoll

Merrill

May

(2016). Do accountability policies push teachers out? Educational Leadership, 73(8), 44–49. https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/551/

23.

Ingersoll

R. M.

Merrill

Stuckey

Collins

Harrison

(2022). Five trends shaping the teaching force. State Education Standard, 22(3), 6. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1357150.pdf

24.

Ingersoll

R. M.

Smith

T. M.

(2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30–33. https://www.gse.upenn.edu/pdf/rmi/EL_TheWrongSolution_to_theTeacherShortage.pdf

25.

Ingersoll

R. M.

Smith

T. M.

(2004). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter? NAASP Bulletin, 88(638), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650408863803

26.

Institute of Education Science (IES). (n.d.). Urban education in America: School locale definitions. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Retrieved February 10, 2021, from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/urbaned/definitions.asp

27.

Jarrold-Grapes

Mahler

P. P.

(2024). Retirees return to work: How a North Carolina policy helped staff high need schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 32(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.32.8241

28.

Katnik

(2022). Teacher recruitment and retention in Missouri. State Education Standard, 22(3), 35–38. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1357154.pdf

29.

Kini

Podolsky

(2016). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A review of the research. Learning Policy Institute.

30.

Ladson-Billings

(1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465

31.

Lee

(2014). No child left behind (NCLB): What you need to know [Web log post]. https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIg-Py-6ir5QIVl8DICh1NQAuEEAAYASAAEgIgHvD_BwE

32.

Lewis

C. W.

Chambers

T. H.

Butler

B. R.

(2012). Urban education in the 21st century: An overview of selected issues that impact African American student outcomes. In Moore

J. L.

Lewis

C.W.

(Eds.), African American students in urban schools: Critical issues and solutions for achievement (pp. 11–30). Peter Lang Publishing.

33.

Medina

A. L

. (2022). Situating the university classroom in the community to create a service-learning pathway: The impact on participants and recipients. Pu

Wright

W. E.

(Eds.), Innovating the TESOL Practicum in Teacher Education: Design, Implementation, and Pedagogy in an Era of Change (pp. 119–139). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

34.

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) (2019–2020). The nation’s report card: NAEP report card: 2019 NAEP mathematics assessment. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/mathematics/2019/

35.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2020). The condition of education 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/

36.

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI). (2019). North Carolina school report cards. https://ncreportcards.ondemand.sas.com/SASVisualAnalyticsViewer/VisualAnalyticsViewer_guest.jsp?reportPath=/ReportCard/NC_SRC&reportName=NC+Report+Cards

37.

Paris

Alim

S. H.

(2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.

38.

Peercy

M. M.

Tigert

Feagin

Kidwell

Fredricks

Lawyer

Bitter

Canales

Mallory

(2019). “I need to take care of myself”: The case for self-care as a core practice for teaching. In Rinke

C. R.

Mawhinney’s

(Eds.), Opportunities and challenges in teacher recruitment and retention: Teachers’ voices across the pipeline (pp. 303–325). Information Age Publishing, Inc.

39.

Pilonieta

Medina

A. L.

Hathaway

J. I

. (2017). The impact of a study abroad experience on preservice teachers’ dispositions and plans for teaching English language learners. The Teacher Educator, 52(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2016.1247204

40.

Podolsky

Kini

Darling-Hammond

Bishop

(2019). Strategies for attracting and retaining educators: What does the evidence say? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(38), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3722

41.

Public Schools First NC. (2019, September 15). A-F school performance grades [Web post]. https://www.publicschoolsfirstnc.org/resources/fact-sheets/a-f-school-performance-grades/

42.

Rinke

C. R.

Mawhinney

(2019). Conclusion: From pipeline to web in teacher career development. In Rinke

C. R.

Mawhinney

(Eds.), Opportunities and challenges in teacher recruitment and retention: Teachers’ voices across the pipeline (pp. 329–337). Information Age Publishing, Inc.

43.

Sell

C. R.

(2019). What it takes to stay: Three stories of teacher retention. In Rinke

C. R.

Mawhinney

(Eds.), Opportunities and challenges in teacher recruitment and retention: Teachers’ voices across the pipeline (pp. 93–119). Information Age Publishing, Inc.

44.

Shakrani

(2008). Teacher turnover: Costly crisis, solvable problem. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED502130

45.

Shen

(1997). Teacher retention and attrition in public schools: Evidence from SASS91. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679709597525

46.

Sleeter

(2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: Research and the overwhelming presence of whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 94–106. https://journals-sagepub-com.librarylink.uncc.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022487101052002002

47.

Springer

M. G.

Swain

W. A.

Rodriguez

L. A.

(2016). Effective teacher retention bonuses: Evidence from Tennessee. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 199–221. http://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715609687

48.

Steele

J. L.

Pepper

M. J.

Springer

M. G.

Lockwood

J. R.

(2015). The distribution and mobility of effective teachers: Evidence from a large, urban school district. Economics of Education Review, 48, 86–101. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.05.009

49.

Sutcher

Darling-Hammond

Carver-Thomas

(2019). Understanding teacher shortages: An analysis of teacher supply and demand in the United States. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(35), 1–40. http://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3696

50.

Uprichard

(2009). Introducing cluster analysis: What it can teach us about the case. In Byrne

Ragin

C. C.

(Eds.), Byrne and Ragin’s sage handbook of case based methods (pp. 132–147). Sage.

51.

Viano

Pham

L. D.

Henry

G. T.

Kho

Zimmer

(2021). What teachers want: School factors predicting teachers’ decisions to work in low performing schools. American Educational Research Journal, 58(1), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220930199

52.

Wagner

(2019, September 6). Yes, “A” still stands for affluent in NC school performance grades [Online forum]. https://www.ncforum.org/yes-a-still-stands-for-affluent-in-nc-school-performance-grades/

53.

Wilkinson

G. A.

(2009). Supportive induction slows the revolving door. Research in Comparative and International Education, 4(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2009.4.1.97

54.

Wronowski

M. L.

(2018). Filling the void: A grounded theory approach to addressing teacher recruitment and retention in urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 50(6), 548–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517713608

55.

Wronowski

M. L.

(2021). De-professionalized and demoralized: A framework for understanding teacher turnover in the accountability policy era. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 20(4), 599–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1734209

56.

Yuan

V. N.

McCaffrey

D. F.

Marsh

J. A.

Hamilton

L. S.

Stecher

B. M.

Springer

M. G.

(2013). Incentive pay programs do not affect teacher motivation or reported practices: Results from three randomized studies. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712462625