Education professionals and policy makers have been working to “close the achievement gap” for some time. Differences in school performance for children from diverse and different family backgrounds have been at the core of past and present social, political, and education reform initiatives and practices. Previous research suggests that student characteristics and social capital (i.e., supportive aspects of social structures and people) predict academic achievement. In the present study, we examined the impact of school demographics, including distributions of exceptional children, and community capital (i.e., financial, human, and social capital in a family) on educational achievement as an opportunity to reframe the perspective on blame and explore the benefits of intentional diversity and integration on the educational advancement for all children. One result showed that community capital was a strong predictor of academic outcomes. We also found that the concentrations of students with academic gifts, behavior problems, or mental retardation and interesting interactions among these variables had differing impacts on academic achievement at the school level.
Barnes, J.E. ( 2004, March 22). Unequal education. U.S. News and World Report . Retrieved March 31, 2006, from http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/articles/040322/22unequal.htm
2.
Barton, P.E. ( 2002). Raising achievement and reducing gaps: Reporting progress toward goals for academic achievement in mathematics. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
3.
Barton, P.E. ( 2003, October). Parsing the achievement gap (Policy Information Report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4.
Bielinski, J., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (2000). Interpreting trends in the performance of special education students (NCEO Technical Report 27). Minneapolis, MN: National Center of Educational Outcomes . Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/TechReport27.htm
5.
Braun, H., Jenkins, F., & Grigg, W. ( 2006). Comparing private schools and public schools using Hierarchical Linear Modeling (NCES 2006-461). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6.
Braun, H.I., Wang, A., Jenkins, F., & Weinbaum, E. ( 2006). The Black-White achievement gap: Do state policies matter?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14. Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n8/
7.
Center for Education Policy. (2007). Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era . Washington, DC: Author.
8.
Coladarci, T. ( 2006, April). School size, student achievement, and the "Power Rating" of poverty: Substantive finding or statistical artifact?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED491668)
9.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1967a). Equality of educational opportunity, reconsidered. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Center for Student of Social Organization of Schools.
10.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1967b, October). The concept of equality of educational opportunity . Paper prepared for conference on the U.S. Office of Education report on Equality of Educational Opportunity, Harvard University.
11.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1968). The evaluation of equality of educational opportunity, reconsidered. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Center for Student of Social Organization of Schools.
12.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1969). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl. 95), S95-S120.
14.
Coleman, J.S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department Health, Education and Welfare.
15.
Dunn, L.M. ( 1968). Special education for the mentally retarded: Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 35, 5-22.
16.
Edelman, P. B., & Ladner, J. (Eds.). (1991). Adolescence and poverty: Challenge for the 1990’s. Washington, DC: Center for National Policy.
17.
Education Trust. (2003a) African-American achievement in America. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
Education Trust. (2003b) Latino achievement in America. Washington, DC: Author.
19.
Evans, R. ( 2005). Reframing the achievement gap. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 582-589.
20.
Ferguson, R.F. ( 1999a). Can schools narrow the Black-White test score gap? In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 318-374). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
21.
Ferguson, R.F. ( 1999b). Teachers’ perceptions and expectation and the Black-White test score gap. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 273-317). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22.
Ferguson, R.F. ( 2002). What doesn’t meet the eye: Understanding and addressing racial disparities in high-achieving suburban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED474390]
23.
Ferguson, R.F. ( 2003). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. Urban Education, 38, 460-507.
24.
Ferguson, R.F., & Metha, J. ( 2004). An unfinished journey: The legacy of Brown and the narrowing of the achievement gap. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 656-669.
25.
Furstenberg, F.F., Jr. & Hughes, M.E. (1995). Social capital and successful development among at-risk youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 580-592.
26.
Greeson, A.D., & Carter, D.G. ( 1976). Equal educational opportunity for the gifted: In search of a legal standard. NOLPE School Law Journal, 6, 145-154.
27.
Haberman, M. ( 1995). Star teachers of children in poverty. Madison, WI: Phi Delta Kappa.
28.
Hirsh, S.C. ( 2005). Professional development and closing the achievement gap. Theory Into Practice, 44, 38-44.
29.
Jencks, C. ( 1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
30.
Jencks, C., & Peterson, P. E. (Eds.). (1991). The urban underclass . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
31.
Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. ( 1998a). The Black-White test score gap: An introduction. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 1-52). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
32.
Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (Eds). (1998b). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
33.
Kozol, J. ( 1991). Savage inequalities. New York: Harper Perennial.
34.
Kozol, J. ( 2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Random House, Crown Publishing Group.
35.
Lehr, C., & Thurlow, M. ( 2003). Putting it all together: Including students with disabilities in assessment and accountability systems (Policy Directions No. 16). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved March 26, 2006 , from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/Online-Pubs/Policy16.htm
36.
Lubienski, C., & Lubienski, S.T. (2006). Charter, private, public schools and academic achievement: New evidence from NAEP Mathematics data . New York: Columbia University .
37.
Metropolitan Studies Group. (2004, September 7). Charlotte neighborhood quality of life study. Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://www.charmeck.org/Departments/Neighborhood+Dev/Quality+of+Life/home.htm
38.
Mills, C.W. ( 1956). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2003). Characteristics of the 100 largest public elementary and secondary school districts in the United States: 2001-02 (NCES 2003-353) . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
40.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2005). Digest of education statistics, 2004 (NCES 2006005). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
41.
National Center on Educational Outcomes. ( 2003). Accountability for assessment results in the No Child Left Behind act: What it means for children with disabilities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved March 26, 2006 , from http://education.umn.edu/nceo/OnlinePubs/NCLBdisabilities.html
42.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002). Public Law No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425.
43.
Odden, A., & Picus, L. ( 2000). School finance: A policy perspective (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
44.
Porfeli, E.J., McColl, A., Wang, C., Algozzine, B., & Audette, R. ( 2006). Redefining the achievement gap within the context of community capital. Charlotte, NC: Behavior and Reading Improvement Center.
45.
Powell, B., & Steelman, L.C. (1984). Variations in state SAT performance: Meaningful or misleading? Harvard Education Review , 54, 389-412.
46.
Robinson, G.E., & Brandon, D.P. ( 1994). NAEP test scores: Should they be used to compare and rank state educational quality?Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
47.
Rothstein, R. ( 2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the Black-White achievement gap. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
48.
Sirin, S.R. ( 2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417-453.
49.
Teachman, J.D., Paasch, K., & Carver, K. ( 1996). Social capital and dropping out of school early. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 773-783.
50.
Teale, W.H., Paciga, K.A., & Hoffman, J.L. ( 2007). Beginning reading instruction in urban schools: The curriculum gap ensures a continuing achievement gap. Reading Teacher , 61, 344-348.
51.
Thurlow, M.L., Nelson, J.R., Teelucksingh, E., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (2000). Where’s Waldo? A third search for students with disabilities in state accountability reports (Technical Report No. 25). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/TechReport25.html
52.
Thurlow, M.L., & Wiley, H.I. ( 2004). Almost there in public reporting of assessment results for students with disabilities (Technical Report 39). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved March 26, 2006 , from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Technical39.htm
53.
Trimble, S. ( 1998). Performance trends and use of accommodations on a statewide assessment: Students with disabilities in the KIRIS on-demand assessment from 1992-93 through 1995-96 (Maryland-Kentucky Report 3). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved March 26, 2006 , from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/MDKY_3.html
54.
Uyeno, R., Zhang, S., & Chin-Chance, S. (2006, April). The role of demographic factors in predicting student performance on a state reading test. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED493067)
55.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Educational achievement and Black-White inequality (NCES No. 2001-061). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics .
56.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). The condition of education 2006 (NCES 2006-071). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
57.
Witty, E.P. ( 1978). Equal educational opportunity for gifted minority group children: Promise or possibility? Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 344-352.
58.
Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., Langenfeld, K., Nelson, J.R., Teelucksingh, E., & Seyfarth, A. ( 1998). Educational results for students with disabilities: What do the data tell us? (Technical Report 23). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://education.umn.edu/nceo/OnlinePubs/TechnicalReport23/TechReport23text.html
